Yes, clearly military members between the ages of 18 and 21 should not be allowed to touch weapons. Rather, they should spend their time doing diversity training and learning about how white / male privilege is the real enemy. They can also play a lot of video games so they understand what war is all about. If anyone stays in past the age of 21, then we can give them a weapon. Start with a slingshot and gradually work them up to a BB gun, then a .22 bolt action. By the time they are 30, they might be ready to be in the same room with one of those evil "assault rifles", assuming they can pass a full mental and psychological evaluation and can qualify for a top secret clearance, and can demonstrate that they have never communicated with anyone who has any Russian ancestry. This assumes we still have a country left by the time they turn 30.cmgee67 wrote:http://www.theakforum.net/forums/14-gen ... ics/285529
Follow link and go to the video of him and lance Armstrong. Start at 11:55.
He says the massive solution is gun control and a 19 year old kid shouldn’t even be allowed to buy an AR-15. With Being a military supporter and being an ex green beret he should realize that 18 year olds join and go to war. So now I guess you have to be 21 in his eyes in the military before you can be issued an M4.
I used to to think he was a big 2A supporter but how can you say that you are and and say gun control is the solution. I have never really liked him and his cocky attitude but this definitely was the final nail in the coffin.
This guy sounds brilliant! I'm sure President Pelosi will tap him for a high level military command. Maybe even Secretary of Defense!