Search found 2 matches

by Soccerdad1995
Wed Nov 14, 2018 10:20 am
Forum: General Legislative Discussions
Topic: Interesting gun bills filed for 2019 session
Replies: 29
Views: 8571

Re: Interesting gun bills filed for 2019 session

The Annoyed Man wrote: Tue Nov 13, 2018 10:15 pm
chasfm11 wrote: Tue Nov 13, 2018 2:08 pm OK TAM. I'll jump into the devil's advocate role.

1. What part of the Constitution gives the Federal government the power to regulate anything built and used in Texas?. I get it that power has been usurped in situations like the farmer growing crops for his own use being declared interstate commerce. That was a real stretch and should have been slapped down. Like "shall not be infringed", "interstate" has been twisted to mean things that it shouldn't.
2. I think that I understand the interpretation of supremacy clause and that to overturn a Federal law, a State should have to take the Feds to court over it, not try to nullify it with their own laws. But if the Federal law is outside of its granted powers, the State should win, based on the 10th Amendment.

My $.02.
Just to be clear, I am NOT arguing against this bill. ALL I am doing is pointing out that it is vulnerable to the same kind of criticisms from the left that the right uses against sanctuary city/state immigration laws. There have been times in our history when it was the wrong thing to do, but as a general thing, I tend to favor states telling the fed gov’t where/when to step off.

To answer your question, Congress has used the commerce clause to abuse all kinds of things. They’re not about to stop either. You’re right. A federal attempt to regulate manufacturing that never leaves the sate is bunk. But they do it anyway, and I predict that if this law is challenged, it will be done either under the Commerce Clause, or by somehow extending ATF’s mandate into this area.

The flip side of that is that we’ve gotten two new conservative justices, and might get another one if RBG steps down. So if the issue ever get’s to SCOTUS, the ruling on the topic may well go our way. We’ll see.
After Trump appoints 2+ additional constitutionalists to the SCOTUS, I am hopeful that we will see things like the abuse of the commerce clause and civil asset forfeiture declared unconstitutional. That's why the SCOTUS will be the most important part of Trump's legacy. The next democrat President will destroy his economy and re-impose burdensome regulations, but it will take them much longer to reverse his improvements on the highest court in the land.
by Soccerdad1995
Mon Nov 12, 2018 1:20 pm
Forum: General Legislative Discussions
Topic: Interesting gun bills filed for 2019 session
Replies: 29
Views: 8571

Re: Interesting bill regarding guns made in Texas

sugar land dave. wrote: Mon Nov 12, 2018 12:45 pm Hi mojo84,

I'm not quite sure how I feel about this. What if someone in Texas uses the new plastic printers to make their own unregistered gun? Do we slide from sanctuary cities to sanctuary state? Government without interagency cooperation can range from difficult to downright hard to next to impossible.

Color me conflicted in Sugar Land on a brisk rainy day .

Be well
Since all guns in Texas are "unregistered", I don't see how the possibility of some 3D printed guns is enough of a crisis to justify infringing on anyone's inalienable rights. So I'm not conflicted.

Explain how this could result in massive amounts of deaths and I might be OK with taking away people's god given rights in exchange.

Return to “Interesting gun bills filed for 2019 session”