It will be interesting the day an HGL holder is wounded when someone shoots up a 30.06 location, and the holder testifies he left his gun in the car because of the sign. As far as I know, nothing stops a plaintiff's lawyer from arguing negligence based on failure to provide security after posting the sign.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “SB 772 - Lack of 30.06/7 signs cannot be entered as evidence in a civil trial”
- Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:00 pm
- Forum: 2019 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: SB 772 - Lack of 30.06/7 signs cannot be entered as evidence in a civil trial
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7128
Re: SB 772 - Lack of 30.06/7 signs cannot be entered as evidence in a civil trial
- Fri Feb 22, 2019 10:51 pm
- Forum: 2019 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: SB 772 - Lack of 30.06/7 signs cannot be entered as evidence in a civil trial
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7128
Re: SB 772 - Lack of 30.06/7 signs cannot be entered as evidence in a civil trial
Texas allows a cause of action for negligence. If passed, this would keep a plaintiff's lawyer from arguing that a jury should find the business negligent for failure to post.