You must have gotten a M1.0 9C? The M2.0 is 15 round capacity and it's definitely heftier than my Shields.Crash wrote:Solved my problem today: bought a S&W M&P 9C. With the smallest backstrap it hardly feels any bigger than the Shield. Capacity is 11 +1, so it's about the perfect combination of capacity and size. As a plus, it's a lot easier to rack the slide.
So, thanks for all the recommendations--really appreciate them.
Crash
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Double-stack 9mm with the thinnest grip”
- Thu Feb 08, 2018 1:10 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Double-stack 9mm with the thinnest grip
- Replies: 28
- Views: 10444
Re: Double-stack 9mm with the thinnest grip
- Tue Feb 06, 2018 10:09 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Double-stack 9mm with the thinnest grip
- Replies: 28
- Views: 10444
Re: Double-stack 9mm with the thinnest grip
I have small hands too. My solution was M&P 2.0 in both full and compact sizes. Four sizes of back straps and very aggressive grip stripling. Full size 17rd mags, Compact 15rd magsCrash wrote:I currently have both a Glock 43 and a S&W Shield in 9mm, but I would like more capacity--say at least 12 rounds. The problem is that I have small hands/short stubby fingers and have trouble getting a good grip on a pistol with a double-column magazine. What is the thinnest-gripped, double-column 9mm out there?
Thanks,
Crash
This past weekend I shot a Walther PPQ and it fit my hand very well too.