That's the issue- shooting to wound is not legal. Regarding his marksmanship, unless he has validated this with the Department, and is a Designated Marksman, or similar, he is in violation of policy.Paladin wrote: ↑Fri Aug 10, 2018 3:19 pm
Police should never be charged for doing something legal that happens to be outside their training or "common practice"
This officer had above average marksmanship skills, which is why he would not recommend others taking the shot. Round #3 went into the ground, his background was clear.
Please don't get me wrong- in a "common sense" world, I have little issue with what was done. However, having worked EMS, supporting the Tac team, there are waaaay too many guys who think they're "above average" because they got lucky, stepping outside of policy. More often than not, it ends badly when someone is killed or injured because of their "superiority" and risk-taking. Dunn may be a high performer, with measured extreme competence with small arms. If so, good on him. Because the totality of circumstances brought him to a negative finding in the shoot, I suspect that is not the case.