cyphertext wrote: ↑Wed Nov 28, 2018 4:50 pmI have a PF9 as well and my experience has been quite different than yours. And as I said, you can argue which firearm is better made, but Sig is not first to market with a 10+1 gun in this size. The Sig marketing claims "unprecedented".... nope, Kel-tec did it first. My statement was not about quality, just a response to the claims of "innovative" and "unprecedented".locke_n_load wrote: ↑Wed Nov 28, 2018 3:59 pmI have a keltec pf9 which holds 7+1 and is a piece of junk. Not even on the same playing field.cyphertext wrote: ↑Wed Nov 28, 2018 1:57 pmYou guys realize that Keltec made a gun that is basically the same size with the same size capacity as the P365 almost 20 years ago in the Kel-tec P11, right? We can argue that the Sig is the better made gun, but they were not the first to market a pistol of this size with a 10 round magazine.
The Keltec P-11 is much better than the PF9 I had both of them a while back. I pawn the PF9 and my brother borrowed the P-11 about 2 years ago and never returned it (image that ). The 365 is a nice weapon I have fired it a couple of times at the range and almost bought one. I bought the SCCY CPX 2 for half the price and it shoots just as good as the Sig, in my opinion for half the price and the best warranty in the business.