TexasCHLforum.com

If property rights allow someone to ban CHLs carrying then they should also be able to ban LEOs carrying. Also their property rights should allow them to ban piercings, tattoos, speaking Spanish on the property, possession of tobacco, Muslim scarves, underwear, or anything else they want. If property owners can't ban those things then why should they be able to ban guns?

lrb111 wrote:Since our governor said after the Virginia Tech shooting that "Texas CHLs should be able to carry everywhere that police can." Then quite simply our legislators need to serve it up. I think Perry would like Texas to have a "first" in this line of legislation, instead of following other state's leads.

That would be great. Repeal 46.035 and simplify 46.15 by getting rid of (a)(6) and fixing (a)(4) to say

a person who is licensed to carry a concealed handgun under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code;