Search found 2 matches

by The Annoyed Man
Wed Oct 07, 2020 12:55 pm
Forum: Self-Defense Reports
Topic: MO: St. Louis Lawyers Defend Mansion From BLM Protesters In Viral Video
Replies: 160
Views: 60522

Re: MO: St. Louis Lawyers Defend Mansion From BLM Protesters In Viral Video

der Teufel wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 12:53 pm
The Annoyed Man wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 12:48 pm Pardon my ignorance, but what is a "ham sandwich indictment"?
I think there's "an old saying" that a DA can present whatever evidence to a grand jury they feel appropriate, omitting what doesn't fit their narrative, such that they could indict a ham sandwich of a crime if they desired to do so.
Ah. Thanks.
by The Annoyed Man
Wed Oct 07, 2020 12:48 pm
Forum: Self-Defense Reports
Topic: MO: St. Louis Lawyers Defend Mansion From BLM Protesters In Viral Video
Replies: 160
Views: 60522

Re: MO: St. Louis Lawyers Defend Mansion From BLM Protesters In Viral Video

dlh wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 10:56 am
rtschl wrote: Tue Oct 06, 2020 3:54 pm The couple has been indicted. :mad5

A grand jury in St. Louis on Tuesday indicted Mark and Patricia McCloskey on counts of exhibiting a weapon and tampering with evidence four months after footage circulated showing the couple pointing guns at Black Lives Matter protesters outside their home.

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watc ... protesters
In my opinion Kim Gardner has indicted the proverbial "ham sandwich." She should have to try the case herself. However, would not surprise
me at all if she passes it off to one of her assistants. There was a District Attorney in Texas who kept "ham sandwiches" to a minimum. He told his assistants if you indict a ham sandwich then YOU get to try the ham sandwich--really cut down on the ham sandwich indictments in his district.
Pardon my ignorance, but what is a "ham sandwich indictment"?

Return to “MO: St. Louis Lawyers Defend Mansion From BLM Protesters In Viral Video”