TexasCHLforum.com

flintknapper wrote:

Charles L. Cotton wrote:

tbrown wrote:

Charles L. Cotton wrote:

rp_photo wrote:Can employers circumvent this by posting 30.06 signs at lot entrances?

As with all CHL issues, we need to celebrate quietly and especially avoid rubbing anything in "The Man's" face.

No. There is a doctrine in law that the "specific controls the general." TPC §30.06 is a trespass statute that is based upon the ability of a property owner to bar entry to certain persons. SB321 strips employers of this authority over employees.

Chas.

But the sign would still apply to customers, visitors and other people who aren't employees. Right?

Correct.

Chas.

So how would it affect (if at all) those folks if they were carrying (in their vehicle) under MPA?

tbrown wrote:

Charles L. Cotton wrote:

rp_photo wrote:Can employers circumvent this by posting 30.06 signs at lot entrances?

As with all CHL issues, we need to celebrate quietly and especially avoid rubbing anything in "The Man's" face.

No. There is a doctrine in law that the "specific controls the general." TPC §30.06 is a trespass statute that is based upon the ability of a property owner to bar entry to certain persons. SB321 strips employers of this authority over employees.

Chas.

But the sign would still apply to customers, visitors and other people who aren't employees. Right?

rp_photo wrote:Can employers circumvent this by posting 30.06 signs at lot entrances?

As with all CHL issues, we need to celebrate quietly and especially avoid rubbing anything in "The Man's" face.