This is the proverbial last straw. You just can't keep from launching personal attacks and insults when people disagree with your position. Good bye.Bitter Clinger wrote: ↑Sun Jun 30, 2019 7:37 amSo you are willing to compromise your ethics as long as the ends justify the means. Good to know.Keith B wrote: ↑Sat Jun 29, 2019 6:17 pm When I was a LEO we had a local criminal defense attorney who had very low morals, had no issues cheating, twisting the truth, and would do whatever it took to make us look bad and his client look like a choirboy. He was ruthless in his methods and had no issue lying, cheating or ruining your reputation to win. I didn’t like him as a person, and didn’t like his lack of scruples. However, I made it clear that if I was ever in need of services like he provided that he would be the first one I would want to represent me.
I don’t like a lot of things our current Commander in Chief does, but I still think he was the best choice for the job we had to choose from that could beat Hitlery.
Bottom line, if Charles says this is the guy for the job, then I believe him 110% and support the choice.
Chas.