So how would it affect (if at all) those folks if they were carrying (in their vehicle) under MPA?Charles L. Cotton wrote:Correct.tbrown wrote:But the sign would still apply to customers, visitors and other people who aren't employees. Right?Charles L. Cotton wrote:No. There is a doctrine in law that the "specific controls the general." TPC §30.06 is a trespass statute that is based upon the ability of a property owner to bar entry to certain persons. SB321 strips employers of this authority over employees.rp_photo wrote:Can employers circumvent this by posting 30.06 signs at lot entrances?
As with all CHL issues, we need to celebrate quietly and especially avoid rubbing anything in "The Man's" face.
Chas.
Chas.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “SB321: Employer parking lots”
- Sun May 29, 2011 4:47 pm
- Forum: 2011 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: SB321: Employer parking lots
- Replies: 71
- Views: 32224
Re: SB321: Employer parking lots
- Fri May 27, 2011 8:26 pm
- Forum: 2011 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: SB321: Employer parking lots
- Replies: 71
- Views: 32224
Re: SB321: Employer parking lots
The addition of Shotguns and Rifles (CHL's/Petro-Chemical) was good! 