Search found 2 matches

Return to “SB 772 - Lack of 30.06/7 signs cannot be entered as evidence in a civil trial”

by jordanmills
Thu Feb 28, 2019 9:06 am
Forum: 2019 Texas Legislative Session
Topic: SB 772 - Lack of 30.06/7 signs cannot be entered as evidence in a civil trial
Replies: 11
Views: 7285

Re: SB 772 - Lack of 30.06/7 signs cannot be entered as evidence in a civil trial

KLB wrote: ↑Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:00 pm
rtschl wrote: ↑Thu Feb 21, 2019 6:55 pm I wish all gun free zones were considered as liability enticements of crime just like a swimming pool without a fence is an liability enticement.
It will be interesting the day an HGL holder is wounded when someone shoots up a 30.06 location, and the holder testifies he left his gun in the car because of the sign. As far as I know, nothing stops a plaintiff's lawyer from arguing negligence based on failure to provide security after posting the sign.
Or the suit from the person who is injured or loses a family member because of a gun stolen from or with a car outside of the same kind of location.
by jordanmills
Fri Feb 22, 2019 10:07 pm
Forum: 2019 Texas Legislative Session
Topic: SB 772 - Lack of 30.06/7 signs cannot be entered as evidence in a civil trial
Replies: 11
Views: 7285

Re: SB 772 - Lack of 30.06/7 signs cannot be entered as evidence in a civil trial

rtschl wrote: ↑Thu Feb 21, 2019 6:55 pm I wish all gun free zones were considered as liability enticements of crime just like a swimming pool without a fence is an liability enticement.
yep, I've said the same thing. That and that they are attractive nuisances.

Return to “SB 772 - Lack of 30.06/7 signs cannot be entered as evidence in a civil trial”