Not Mike S, But, there's no reason they would see that as a discrepancy. Although it's not COMMON, especially since the 4-hour classes began, but it's certainly not unheard of for an instructor to provide classroom-only or range-only qualifications.RossA wrote:Mike S, if I simply leave the proficiency part blank, but then a few weeks later administer the proficiency test and he passes, will the state see some discrepancy between a CHL 100 where I have signed that he passed but a CHL8 with no indication of a proficiency test?
In fact, one scenario that was described when I took my instructor's class a few years ago was exactly that: one instructor doing classroom for the students, and one instructor doing the range qualifications. I've done a few range-only qualifications for students and submitted CHL-8 for range-only work, but it's been a few years.
I don't see it as an issue at all.