Search found 3 matches

by Liberty
Thu May 31, 2018 12:09 pm
Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
Topic: Do Own A Sig 365?
Replies: 74
Views: 26216

Re: Do Own A Sig 365?

flechero wrote: Thu May 31, 2018 8:51 am
Liberty wrote: Thu May 31, 2018 4:45 am I would never trust a 1911 because of reliability issues with defensive ammo
Isn't that a bit broad? Since there have been over 100 manufacturers and 1000's of models in the last 100+ years, ruling out an entire class of pistol, and it's variants. (many of which are as reliable as any "modern" design) Using that logic in plastic guns that have ever choked, would nearly eliminate any choice left.

I agree that reliability is key, but also realize that there is a difference between Baer, Wilson, STI,etc and ATI,Jennings, etc. About like comparing a 2018 Rolls Royce to a 74' pinto. :lol:
I was just speaking for myself, I also recognize that many folks have 1911s that reliably cycle their chosen defensive ammunition. I have fired $1000 dollar Kimbers that would choke occasionally on certain defensive ammo. I can't see me ever spending the time and money testing defensive ammo to find the magic formula I am not into fluffing and buffing, spending more than $700 dollars when my $3 and $400 dollar guns have worked out well for me.

All this being said, My next handgun will probably be a Rugger SR1911 commander. But It will be used as a range gun, not for defensive purposes.

YMMV
by Liberty
Thu May 31, 2018 7:57 am
Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
Topic: Do Own A Sig 365?
Replies: 74
Views: 26216

Re: Do Own A Sig 365?

cyphertext wrote: Thu May 31, 2018 7:22 am
Liberty wrote: Thu May 31, 2018 4:45 am For me there are two kinds of guns, Gunst to depend on and guns that are toys. I wouldn't buy a gun that to carry or protect my home that hadn't been on the market for a few years. and developed a reputation for being safe and reliable. A gun that's to be used as a range toy or a collector's safe queen is a different story. I would think that one would want to have the highest possible confidence in the weapons they choose to carry.

Other people have more trust than I do. I would never trust a 1911 because of reliability issues with defensive ammo nor a Glock's and their ilk because of their reputation for shooting the people they are meant to protect. Others don't worry about such things. That's OK, but for me, I carry because of the tiny odds I'm going to need it. It makes no sense to play the odds with unsafe or unreliable weapons.

Some people put little importance to being drop safe. The thing is most people aren't that drop safe. We get into car accidents we fall, and things fall onto us. It's one thing to take a gun that might not be 100% drop safe to the range, but on one's persons while working driving etc. is a risk I wouldn't want to take. like everything in life though we make choices.
Now I'm curious in what you carry? I've never seen a Glock shoot someone without the trigger being pulled. Can't blame the gun for owner's carelessness.
I agree its always the trigger being pulled but sometimes though its a shirtsleeve, others its a piece of holster. While Glockleg is almost always the users fault, there is just less of a margin of safety. The art and science of safety typically calls for layers of protection. A manual safety, double action first shot trigger, and rising hammer is a triple layer of added safety.
I mostly carry a Beretta Storm Subcompact. other times I carry a 92FS, less often I take my Ruger P95 out to get some air.
To be honest , I understand some people carry them feeling perfectly safe. I've been carrying DA/SA so long that feel like somethings missing when handling the typical striker pistol. I'm also concerned that so many folks are buying these micro striker guns as their first guns. I don't mean to get evangelical about all this, but I do believe that new buyers don't even consider the options.
by Liberty
Thu May 31, 2018 4:45 am
Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
Topic: Do Own A Sig 365?
Replies: 74
Views: 26216

Re: Do Own A Sig 365?

For me there are two kinds of guns, Gunst to depend on and guns that are toys. I wouldn't buy a gun that to carry or protect my home that hadn't been on the market for a few years. and developed a reputation for being safe and reliable. A gun that's to be used as a range toy or a collector's safe queen is a different story. I would think that one would want to have the highest possible confidence in the weapons they choose to carry.

Other people have more trust than I do. I would never trust a 1911 because of reliability issues with defensive ammo nor a Glock's and their ilk because of their reputation for shooting the people they are meant to protect. Others don't worry about such things. That's OK, but for me, I carry because of the tiny odds I'm going to need it. It makes no sense to play the odds with unsafe or unreliable weapons.

Some people put little importance to being drop safe. The thing is most people aren't that drop safe. We get into car accidents we fall, and things fall onto us. It's one thing to take a gun that might not be 100% drop safe to the range, but on one's persons while working driving etc. is a risk I wouldn't want to take. like everything in life though we make choices.

Return to “Do Own A Sig 365?”