Imagine that Rosa Parks was able to sit in the front of the bus day after day and no one was the wiser. That's what 30.06 is like.C-dub wrote: The problem with there being little or no case law on these types of violations is that, as a group, CHL/LTC holders have fewer arrests or convictions of crimes than the group of law enforcers in the state of Texas. I may not have stated that completely correctly, but that's the gist of it. We don't break the law very much or at all and I'm not aware of anyone that would like to be a test case in this or any other areas. So, often times, just complaining that something is vague or confusing doesn't ever get addressed by the legislature until someone is found guilty or punished or is in some way harmed because of some unintended or incorrect interpretation of a law.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “another 30.06 question”
- Sat Aug 12, 2017 2:06 pm
- Forum: New to CHL?
- Topic: another 30.06 question
- Replies: 84
- Views: 44642
Re: another 30.06 question
- Sat Aug 12, 2017 1:59 pm
- Forum: New to CHL?
- Topic: another 30.06 question
- Replies: 84
- Views: 44642
Re: another 30.06 question
I don't see 30.06 as a sacred property right but rather a public accommodation issue.
Anyone who opens their property to the public must agree to not discriminate against various classes, which in my opinion should include legal carriers.
Along with that, property owners who don't post should be shielded from liability over actions of a legal carrier on their property, but being exposed to liability for the death and injury of a disarmed legal carrier if they choose to post. Note that this would provide a crucial upside to not posting which is missing now.
Anyone who opens their property to the public must agree to not discriminate against various classes, which in my opinion should include legal carriers.
Along with that, property owners who don't post should be shielded from liability over actions of a legal carrier on their property, but being exposed to liability for the death and injury of a disarmed legal carrier if they choose to post. Note that this would provide a crucial upside to not posting which is missing now.