This reporting sounds a bit hopeful.
https://reason.com/2019/12/02/new-york- ... ey-werent/
Search found 3 matches
Return to “SCOTUS: to rule on gun rights”
- Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:30 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: SCOTUS: to rule on gun rights
- Replies: 23
- Views: 9010
- Mon Dec 02, 2019 7:56 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: SCOTUS: to rule on gun rights
- Replies: 23
- Views: 9010
Re: SCOTUS: to rule on gun rights
NRA Asked Anti-Gunners the Name Of the SCOTUS Case They Were Protesting. Their Responses Are Amazing.
"The name of the case, I don't know," one man said. "Actually, frankly speaking, I did not read. I was recruited here to represent my grandchildren."
Later in the video the same man is shown talking about the NRA.
"Demand action! Demand action for shutting down [the] NRA," he said. The man also suggested getting rid of the Second Amendment because "a gun for self-protection" is "not relevant at all" today.
"We live in a civilized society and must protect the interest of everybody," he explained.
Another man seemed to think the case was about so-called "assault weapons."
"We want to ban 'assault weapons,'" he said. When asked how an "assault weapon" is defined, his response was even more facepalm worthy.
"Well, anything that can fire as fast as you can pull the trigger," he responded. Based on that definition alone, all guns would be banned.
- Mon Dec 02, 2019 11:48 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: SCOTUS: to rule on gun rights
- Replies: 23
- Views: 9010
Re: SCOTUS: to rule on gun rights
SCOTUS oral arguments are still not televised, right?
Working from home today. Would like to watch.
Working from home today. Would like to watch.