TexasCHLforum.com

parabelum wrote:30 pounds.

Only 30?

bblhd672 wrote: Now all we need is someone with the time and money necessary to take the ride and trial to prove the AG correct.

This is the crux of it. You're not going to stand there and have a "line by line analysis and discussion" with an LEO putting you in cuffs and taking you downtown.

Good video, thanks for posting. It's easy to predict how some of those people would I've occasionally toyed with the question of how many shots to fire, as well as how fast to fire them. My instinctive (and regularly practiced) inclination is to instantly whip out the gun and fire 4 or 5 shots as fa...

No-spill gasoline canister spouts.

treadlightly wrote:Banning knives is particularly moronic. An insult to rugged individualism.

Good grief. So all those cowboys, ranchers, etc. can't carry their Case pocket knives? Are the promoters from California or something?

Criminals will now have easy access to these silent death machines...and they will fill our streets. Actually, that's exactly what we'd hear. Just like "assault rifles" are made to "spew death indiscriminately," suppressors (no.... they're "silencers") make a gun go &q...

Also, don't be too sure the government will be able to bring all of that military power to bear on it's own citizens. Remember, our military is 100% volunteer and, as a whole, are largely conservative. Also, approximately 1/3 of all active duty military are from Texas. If the order ever came down t...

I always wondered about the feasibility of this "holding at gunpoint." So you have a bad guy lying on the ground, and you're holding him at gunpoint. You're saying "stay on the ground!" Or what? If he just says (given that he is now unarmed) "up yours" and starts to sta...

We've known about this since last session. In fact, I've been letting people know for a good while. The TAB is not in full support and it isn't a major sore spot with the business community. Andrea Bauer wants everyone to believe this, but it's not the case. I certainly hope you're right. I've hear...

There's bigger fish to fry. I'd leave this one alone. Just my opinion. :iagree: I agree with "holster or pocket" but how about waiting a session or two. A lot of political capital was used to get OC passed and I don't think there is any desire to touch anything related to OC by the legisl...

I thought the holster requirement was for gun safety and keep someone from carrying gangster style. No, as I understand it, the purpose was to ensure that it's not carried openly in the hand, which is certainly understandable. I agree that the best thing to do would be to strike the words "sho...

I would like to see an amendment to modify the "holster" requirement for open carry, to include carrying the gun in a pocket. This could be a pants pocket or maybe a purse's side pocket. My 9mms (SIG and Walther) fit perfectly and snugly in the front pockets of my jeans and work pants, wit...

Our comments are, insofar as I have noticed them, all about expanding our rights. That's a good thing to think about and to be prepared to address. But what if the anti-gunners have an agenda of their own? Has anyone given any thought to what they might try to roll back and how we might counter tha...

Deitz83 wrote:I don't like the bulk of the crossbreed type holsters. I also, am not into getting pants 1 or 2 sizes too large.

Same here. Again, I've never worn an IWB, but some of those things look big as a dinner plate.

What is more important, comfort or concealment? My advice would be to start with OWB and a cover garment if comfort is a concern. If you, personally, have an issue with negative reactions, or whatever, then get an IWB holster. I would say comfort. Most IWB holsters conceal pretty well by default, e...