CA: 1 dead 2 wounded at Costco shooting. Not what you might think.

Reports of actual crimes and investigations, not hypothetical situations.

Moderators: Keith B, carlson1

Post Reply

Topic author
philip964
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 9122
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:30 pm

CA: 1 dead 2 wounded at Costco shooting. Not what you might think.

#1

Post by philip964 » Sun Jun 16, 2019 11:05 am

https://news.yahoo.com/shooting-inside- ... 03366.html

I heard about this on the news and figured another nut job mass shooting in a gun free zone. (Costco membership fine print prohibits guns inside the store, they generally don't have signs) I also figured it was an illegal gun because who can legally carry in California.

Well I was wrong. Office duty police officer holding his child was assaulted by a man with a Mohawk. Mohawk man died. Two of his relatives were wounded. Either the officer was a bad shot or most likely the relatives decided to get involved. The officer fired six times.

I know I'm going to get it from our Mohawk wearing readers, but yeah, like a face tattoo only smarter, as you can change your mind as you get older and decide a face tattoo was what you wanted all along.
Last edited by philip964 on Sun Jun 16, 2019 3:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar

C-dub
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 12624
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: DFW

Re: CA: 1 dead 2 wounded at Costco shooting. Not what you might think.

#2

Post by C-dub » Sun Jun 16, 2019 2:31 pm

To be clear, I had to read the article and the officer did not die. The mohawked attacker died and two of his relatives were also critically injured by the officer.

What really bugs me, though, is that witnesses described the scene as sheer terror and chaos. Even the person that was able to capture video and audio of the event even though she claimed all she wanted to do was get her daughter and get out safely. Yet she has the calmness to think to herself she should record this in her phone. SMH!
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider


Topic author
philip964
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 9122
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:30 pm

Re: CA: 1 dead 2 wounded at Costco shooting. Not what you might think.

#3

Post by philip964 » Sun Jun 16, 2019 3:01 pm

C-dub wrote:
Sun Jun 16, 2019 2:31 pm
To be clear, I had to read the article and the officer did not die. The mohawked attacker died and two of his relatives were also critically injured by the officer.

What really bugs me, though, is that witnesses described the scene as sheer terror and chaos. Even the person that was able to capture video and audio of the event even though she claimed all she wanted to do was get her daughter and get out safely. Yet she has the calmness to think to herself she should record this in her phone. SMH!
Sorry corrected my summary to be more clear.

User avatar

mcscanner
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 159
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 12:18 pm
Location: Lewisville, TX

Re: CA: 1 dead 2 wounded at Costco shooting. Not what you might think.

#4

Post by mcscanner » Mon Jun 17, 2019 9:37 am

Six rounds, 1 fatality and 2 critically injured while holding a child during an assault. I think the officer did well under those circumstances.
It's like landing an airplane. If you can walk away from the landing its good. If the plane is still usable its great.

Mike
The road goes on forever and the party never ends...


chasfm11
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3525
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:01 pm
Location: Northern DFW

Re: CA: 1 dead 2 wounded at Costco shooting. Not what you might think.

#5

Post by chasfm11 » Mon Jun 17, 2019 10:58 am

The story brings up a couple of interesting questions.

1. Was the officer attacked because he was in uniform? Does being in uniform and being assaulted by more than one adult, especially when you have a child to protect change anything?
2. There is no mention of a deadly weapon by the attackers. I'm assuming that would change the matter to ag. assault. One of the situations that has always worried me was being assaulted by multiple youths, responding with deadly force and ending up in jail. I do not believe that our current court situation is neutral toward old white men who try to defend themselves. I wonder if police officers fare any better.
6/23-8/13/10 -51 days to plastic
Dum Spiro, Spero

User avatar

03Lightningrocks
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 7659
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: DFW area

Re: CA: 1 dead 2 wounded at Costco shooting. Not what you might think.

#6

Post by 03Lightningrocks » Mon Jun 17, 2019 11:25 am

philip964 wrote:
Sun Jun 16, 2019 11:05 am

I know I'm going to get it from our Mohawk wearing readers, but yeah, like a face tattoo only smarter, as you can change your mind as you get older and decide a face tattoo was what you wanted all along.
"rlol"

Funny thing. You don't see many guys over fifty with a face tat. So does that say something about guys with face tats longevity?


flechero
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2529
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 5:04 pm
Location: Central Texas

Re: CA: 1 dead 2 wounded at Costco shooting. Not what you might think.

#7

Post by flechero » Mon Jun 17, 2019 11:57 am

chasfm11 wrote:
Mon Jun 17, 2019 10:58 am
The story brings up a couple of interesting questions.

1. Was the officer attacked because he was in uniform? Was he in uniform? I thought they referred to him as off duty- as if to justify that he could legally have a weapon in CA since it's so rare. Does being in uniform and being assaulted by more than one adult, especially when you have a child to protect change anything? IMO, yes- having a child with you diminishes your ability to run, defend yourself/protect child and to fight... holding a child greatly exaggerates it.
2. There is no mention of a deadly weapon by the attackers. I'm assuming that would change the matter to ag. assault. They don't need weapons to kill you, so the lack of additional weapons shouldn't matter. Plus they attacked a person holding a child which limits his options to defend, as mentioned above One of the situations that has always worried me was being assaulted by multiple youths, responding with deadly force and ending up in jail. I do not believe that our current court situation is neutral toward old white men who try to defend themselves. That's true, but it's going to be jury dependent... and is not worth dying to ensure you are not treated unfairly I wonder if police officers fare any better.
my thoughts in blue

Post Reply

Return to “The Crime Blotter”