CO: Police blow up innocent man’s home to capture shop lifting suspect

Reports of actual crimes and investigations, not hypothetical situations.

Moderators: Keith B, carlson1


Topic author
philip964
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 9853
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:30 pm

CO: Police blow up innocent man’s home to capture shop lifting suspect

#1

Post by philip964 » Wed Oct 30, 2019 10:48 am

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2 ... urt-rules/

2015. Court rules that City has no responsiblity for destruction of a man’s home and all his possessions in apprehending an armed shop lifter on the run, who just happened to pick this house to hole up in.

It was not a taking.


Rob72
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 346
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2018 10:08 am
Location: Gulf Coast

Re: CO: Police blow up innocent man’s home to capture shop lifting suspect

#2

Post by Rob72 » Wed Oct 30, 2019 11:41 am

I've worked first response, and I generally support LE. However, you cannot operate in this manner and be surprised when you send SRT into a neighborhood one day, and none of them come out.

User avatar

C-dub
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 12777
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: DFW

Re: CO: Police blow up innocent man’s home to capture shop lifting suspect

#3

Post by C-dub » Wed Oct 30, 2019 11:56 am

It wasn't a taking. However, there must be some other way of being compensated for their destruction.
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider


Soccerdad1995
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 3883
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 8:03 pm

Re: CO: Police blow up innocent man’s home to capture shop lifting suspect

#4

Post by Soccerdad1995 » Wed Oct 30, 2019 11:57 am

So by this logic, if someone steals from me, and runs into the police chief's home, I can blow it up trying to get my belongings back? Somehow I'm thinking that might not go over so well.

I also found this part of the ruling particularly disturbing:
The court acknowledged that this may seem “unfair,” but when police have to protect the public, they can’t be “burdened with the condition” that they compensate whoever is damaged by their actions along the way.
I think we all go by the belief that we are responsible for every bullet that leaves our gun, which means that we are liable if someone is killed or injured by a missed shot, etc. But this seems to imply the opposite, as least as it relates to our employees acting on our behalf (i.e. LEO's).
Ding dong, the witch is dead


imkopaka
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 459
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 1:30 pm
Location: Lamesa, TX

Re: CO: Police blow up innocent man’s home to capture shop lifting suspect

#5

Post by imkopaka » Wed Oct 30, 2019 12:00 pm

I'm sorry, while the actions of police were over the top, police have NEVER been required to compensate people for damage incurred while doing their job unless the damage was done through gross negligence. This is exactly the kind of thing insurance is supposed to cover, and the city offered them enough money to cover their deductible, so realistically compensation has been made. The family was not ruled against because the judge favored the city, they were ruled against because they tried to claim their constitutional rights were violated under the Fifth Amendment, which the judge ruled does not apply to the circumstances. I understand the family feeling cheated and like the ruling is unfair, but ruling in their favor would have set a precedent that would eventually neuter police through municipalities being unable to compensate for every nickel and dime claim against their cops.
Never bring a knife to a gun fight.
Carry gun: Springfield XD Tactical .45


cirus
Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 182
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 9:33 pm

Re: CO: Police blow up innocent man’s home to capture shop lifting suspect

#6

Post by cirus » Wed Oct 30, 2019 12:03 pm

Sounds like a little payback is in order.

User avatar

narcissist
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 478
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2019 10:09 am

Re: CO: Police blow up innocent man’s home to capture shop lifting suspect

#7

Post by narcissist » Wed Oct 30, 2019 12:03 pm

Soccerdad1995 wrote:
Wed Oct 30, 2019 11:57 am
So by this logic, if someone steals from me, and runs into the police chief's home, I can blow it up trying to get my belongings back? Somehow I'm thinking that might not go over so well.

I also found this part of the ruling particularly disturbing:
The court acknowledged that this may seem “unfair,” but when police have to protect the public, they can’t be “burdened with the condition” that they compensate whoever is damaged by their actions along the way.
I think we all go by the belief that we are responsible for every bullet that leaves our gun, which means that we are liable if someone is killed or injured by a missed shot, etc. But this seems to imply the opposite, as least as it relates to our employees acting on our behalf (i.e. LEO's).
Goid point by the way!! Its kinda like those Red Flag laws if someone was to call in a Judge as a Threat you think they are going to follow through with it. Nope!!
One of my biggest mistakes in life...Is Believing people will show me the same love I've shown them. :reddevil


Soccerdad1995
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 3883
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 8:03 pm

Re: CO: Police blow up innocent man’s home to capture shop lifting suspect

#8

Post by Soccerdad1995 » Wed Oct 30, 2019 12:13 pm

imkopaka wrote:
Wed Oct 30, 2019 12:00 pm
I'm sorry, while the actions of police were over the top, police have NEVER been required to compensate people for damage incurred while doing their job unless the damage was done through gross negligence. This is exactly the kind of thing insurance is supposed to cover, and the city offered them enough money to cover their deductible, so realistically compensation has been made. The family was not ruled against because the judge favored the city, they were ruled against because they tried to claim their constitutional rights were violated under the Fifth Amendment, which the judge ruled does not apply to the circumstances. I understand the family feeling cheated and like the ruling is unfair, but ruling in their favor would have set a precedent that would eventually neuter police through municipalities being unable to compensate for every nickel and dime claim against their cops.
I disagree. I don't believe that it was necessary to destroy a home in order to apprehend a shoplifting suspect, armed or otherwise. Break the door down if you need to, but punching holes in the walls is excessive.

Yes, the police should do whatever is necessary to uphold the law and keep everyone safe. But they should also be prepared to justify and explain those decisions. To that end, if they do believe that it is absolutely necessary to demolish a building for the greater public good (of apprehending a shoplifter and getting Walmart back their merchandise), then by all means, do it. But they should treat the cost of replacing that building as part of the cost of enforcing the law. Just like they would treat the cost of bullets fired, or equipment used. And they should be ready and willing to explain to the taxpayers exactly why that cost was necessary.
Ding dong, the witch is dead


crazy2medic
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1665
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2015 9:59 am

Re: CO: Police blow up innocent man’s home to capture shop lifting suspect

#9

Post by crazy2medic » Wed Oct 30, 2019 12:25 pm

The term Excessive Use of Force comes to mind, followed by the thought Payback!
Government, like fire is a dangerous servant and a fearful master
If you ain't paranoid you ain't paying attention

User avatar

Jago668
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 925
Joined: Sun May 03, 2015 12:31 am

Re: CO: Police blow up innocent man’s home to capture shop lifting suspect

#10

Post by Jago668 » Wed Oct 30, 2019 12:56 pm

It is things like this that put people from supporting law enforcement more into a famous NWA song.
NRA Benefactor Member


Jay2121
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 65
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:08 am

Re: CO: Police blow up innocent man’s home to capture shop lifting suspect

#11

Post by Jay2121 » Wed Oct 30, 2019 1:36 pm

This is just stupid. They did it because they knew they could with impunity. For a shoplifter, really. 19 hours, lol. Idoits. There is no reason for this. Others could have been hurt or killed. Who else was in the house they had no idea. Oh I forgot there was a shot fired. Or was there? I hate seeing this. This is one step forward two steps backward for the police. What if this was your house? Yes insurance covered most of it, that way we all pay for it, that makes it better. Geeze.


flechero
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 5:04 pm
Location: Central Texas

Re: CO: Police blow up innocent man’s home to capture shop lifting suspect

#12

Post by flechero » Wed Oct 30, 2019 1:50 pm

Seems like the police should have an insurance policy to cover this kind of stuff..... covering the homeowner's deductible is a good start but the rates go up dramatically on homeowner's policy for claims... heck, just a roof claim for hail damage can often get you dropped and if they keep you it's at a massive premium hike.


Grayling813
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 556
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2019 11:18 am

Re: CO: Police blow up innocent man’s home to capture shop lifting suspect

#13

Post by Grayling813 » Wed Oct 30, 2019 2:00 pm

It seems to me that people on the left and the right should be able to agree that each other is not the problem, the problem is government at all levels and the police forces they are employing against the citizens.


Rob72
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 346
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2018 10:08 am
Location: Gulf Coast

Re: CO: Police blow up innocent man’s home to capture shop lifting suspect

#14

Post by Rob72 » Wed Oct 30, 2019 4:37 pm

imkopaka wrote:
Wed Oct 30, 2019 12:00 pm
I'm sorry, while the actions of police were over the top, police have NEVER been required to compensate people for damage incurred while doing their job unless the damage was done through gross negligence. This is exactly the kind of thing insurance is supposed to cover, and the city offered them enough money to cover their deductible, so realistically compensation has been made. The family was not ruled against because the judge favored the city, they were ruled against because they tried to claim their constitutional rights were violated under the Fifth Amendment, which the judge ruled does not apply to the circumstances. I understand the family feeling cheated and like the ruling is unfair, but ruling in their favor would have set a precedent that would eventually neuter police through municipalities being unable to compensate for every nickel and dime claim against their cops.
True, LE, in most locations, is not required to redress, remediate, or reimburse for damage caused by their actions. False, insurance is not supposed to cover such action. I would suggest that citation of the 5th, stating that this family was materially held liable for prosecution of the fleeing felon, and that loss property/loss of use of property was a direct result of negligence/malfeasance based on the level of aggression used in serving the warrant, might have gone further.

IANAL, but the incentive to use your GI Joes is high, as (unless things have changed) you lose your Fed dollars if they don't play every so often.


cirus
Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 182
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 9:33 pm

Re: CO: Police blow up innocent man’s home to capture shop lifting suspect

#15

Post by cirus » Wed Oct 30, 2019 4:51 pm

Another example of the king treating the people like peasants.

Post Reply

Return to “The Crime Blotter”