HB 1927 on the Senate floor now

This forum is for general legislative discussions not specific to any given legislative session. It will remain open.

Moderator: carlson1

Post Reply

Papa_Tiger
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 67
Posts: 867
Joined: Fri May 24, 2013 9:55 am

Re: HB 1927 on the Senate floor now

#61

Post by Papa_Tiger »

Amendment #27 by West et. al.
Extreme Risk Protective Order - removal of guns from the subject of an extreme risk protective order. Can be brought by a family member or other concerned individual.

Very long-winded and heart felt pitch for a very dangerous concept.

Fails

Papa_Tiger
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 67
Posts: 867
Joined: Fri May 24, 2013 9:55 am

Re: HB 1927 on the Senate floor now

#62

Post by Papa_Tiger »

Passage to third reading passes 18/13.
User avatar

RPBrown
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 5025
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 11:56 am
Location: Irving, Texas

Re: HB 1927 on the Senate floor now

#63

Post by RPBrown »

Passed to third reading 18-13
NRA-Benefactor Life member
TSRA-Life member
Image

Topic author
jerry_r60
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 21
Posts: 594
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 6:47 pm

Re: HB 1927 on the Senate floor now

#64

Post by jerry_r60 »

So third reading can again have debate and amendment as I understand it so not sure if we still have another marathon to get through and then of course conference committee and Governor but I'm assuming those last two should be fine.
User avatar

allisji
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 969
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 10:44 am
Location: Seabrook

Re: HB 1927 on the Senate floor now

#65

Post by allisji »

Soccerdad1995 wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 4:37 pm

I don't love this one. I guess it goes to the definition of "carrying". I have a personal rule that before I touch drink #2 at my house during a party, etc., my gun comes off my side and into a safe. But if someone keeps their safe in the same room they are in while having a few drinks is that considered to be "carrying"?

Also, is there an exception to this if someone breaks into your house and you need to use a weapon in self defense while you are intoxicated?

Well that depends... did he remove his ammunition from the gun? Did he unload his magazine, and then store his loose ammo in a separate safe from his empty magazine which is stored is a separate safe from his handgun? Oh, and just to be clear each of those safes need to have different locks/codes/or unlocking devices, otherwise they are not independent because one individual could open each of the safes without help from another individual. In order to ensure that the safes are safe, you must require 3-factor verification in order to open....
LTC since 2015
I have contacted my state legislators urging support of Constitutional Carry Legislation HB 1927

Topic author
jerry_r60
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 21
Posts: 594
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 6:47 pm

Re: HB 1927 on the Senate floor now

#66

Post by jerry_r60 »

HB 1407 is still on the Calendar for tonight, not as big a deal but would be nice.
User avatar

ELB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 13
Posts: 8128
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: Seguin

Re: HB 1927 on the Senate floor now

#67

Post by ELB »

Papa_Tiger wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 4:55 pm Amendment #18 by Schwertner
Removes the expungement provision and the Dutton Amendment added in the House.

Adopted
I'm glad the bill is through its second reading, but Amendment 18 doesn't seem like a positive step.
USAF 1982-2005
____________

Topic author
jerry_r60
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 21
Posts: 594
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 6:47 pm

Re: HB 1927 on the Senate floor now

#68

Post by jerry_r60 »

Ahh, I didn't think they were going to suspend and do the 3rd tonight. Here we go again.
User avatar

denwego
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 295
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 3:51 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: HB 1927 on the Senate floor now

#69

Post by denwego »

Eckhart just admitting that she gave a convicted wifebeater deferred adjudication as a prosecutor so law abiding people shouldn't carry guns... classic. Absolutely classic.
User avatar

Owens
Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 10:51 am
Location: Levelland

Re: HB 1927 on the Senate floor now

#70

Post by Owens »

Blanco offering the old 'sacrifice liberty for safety' pitch.
Life Member NRA, TSRA
User avatar

bbhack
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 418
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2012 12:34 pm
Location: Texas

Re: HB 1927 on the Senate floor now

#71

Post by bbhack »

Who is this senator lying about 3 1/2 percent of Texans are gum owners?
Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness
User avatar

Jim Beaux
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 1356
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 11:55 pm

Re: HB 1927 on the Senate floor now

#72

Post by Jim Beaux »

I dont know who is speaking, but he tells a story of someone who had to use a hand towel holder to defend his family until he was shot. Ironic he cant snap that if the victim had a gun instead of a towel holder would have had a better chance of living.
“In the world of lies, truth-telling is a hanging offense"
~Unknown

Papa_Tiger
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 67
Posts: 867
Joined: Fri May 24, 2013 9:55 am

Re: HB 1927 on the Senate floor now

#73

Post by Papa_Tiger »

bbhack wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 6:00 pm Who is this senator lying about 3 1/2 percent of Texans are gum owners?
Senator Gutierrez - Bexar County
User avatar

Owens
Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 10:51 am
Location: Levelland

Re: HB 1927 on the Senate floor now

#74

Post by Owens »

That would be Gutierrez. Truth is, he nor no one else truly knows how many people are gun owners in Texas, but I'll bet its WAY more than 3.5%.
Life Member NRA, TSRA

txyaloo
Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 5:38 pm

Re: HB 1927 on the Senate floor now

#75

Post by txyaloo »

bbhack wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 6:00 pm Who is this senator lying about 3 1/2 percent of Texans are gum owners?
3.5% of Texans are LTC holders. I don't think he was talking about total gun owners
Post Reply

Return to “General Legislative Discussions”