Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick attacks NRA and Supports expanded background checks

This forum is for general legislative discussions not specific to any given legislative session. It will remain open.

Moderator: carlson1


jason812
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 1534
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:41 pm
Location: Central Texas

Re: Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick attacks NRA and Supports expanded background checks

#91

Post by jason812 »

RoyGBiv wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:04 pm Let's help draft a law we can live with....


-- Printed receipt for each party
-- Transaction records immediately deleted
How can you have a printed receipt and delete the transaction records?
In certain extreme situations, the law is inadequate. In order to shame its inadequacy, it is necessary to act outside the law to pursue a natural justice.
User avatar

RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 9508
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick attacks NRA and Supports expanded background checks

#92

Post by RoyGBiv »

jason812 wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:06 pm
RoyGBiv wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:04 pm Let's help draft a law we can live with....


-- Printed receipt for each party
-- Transaction records immediately deleted
How can you have a printed receipt and delete the transaction records?
The buyer gets a receipt, the seller gets a receipt, the government gets to delete the record after printing the receipt. Undifficult.
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek

Nuts
Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 183
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 7:47 pm

Re: Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick attacks NRA and Supports expanded background checks

#93

Post by Nuts »

RoyGBiv wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:10 pm
jason812 wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:06 pm
RoyGBiv wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:04 pm Let's help draft a law we can live with....


-- Printed receipt for each party
-- Transaction records immediately deleted
How can you have a printed receipt and delete the transaction records?
The buyer gets a receipt, the seller gets a receipt, the government gets to delete the record after printing the receipt. Undifficult.
And you trust the government to delete them?
User avatar

03Lightningrocks
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 11451
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Plano

Re: Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick attacks NRA and Supports expanded background checks

#94

Post by 03Lightningrocks »

Nuts wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:34 pm
RoyGBiv wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:10 pm
jason812 wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:06 pm
RoyGBiv wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:04 pm Let's help draft a law we can live with....


-- Printed receipt for each party
-- Transaction records immediately deleted
How can you have a printed receipt and delete the transaction records?
The buyer gets a receipt, the seller gets a receipt, the government gets to delete the record after printing the receipt. Undifficult.
And you trust the government to delete them?
Not me. Once it is in "the system" it is not going anywhere. Not one thing with this "offer" would do anything to stop a mass shooter. As a matter of fact, nothing any of the gun grabbers propose will do anything to stop a mass shooter. The thing is, none of them are trying to stop mass shooters. They are simply trying to look like they have done something so they can claim it during an election.
User avatar

RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 9508
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick attacks NRA and Supports expanded background checks

#95

Post by RoyGBiv »

Nuts wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:34 pm
RoyGBiv wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:10 pm
jason812 wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:06 pm
RoyGBiv wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:04 pm Let's help draft a law we can live with....


-- Printed receipt for each party
-- Transaction records immediately deleted
How can you have a printed receipt and delete the transaction records?
The buyer gets a receipt, the seller gets a receipt, the government gets to delete the record after printing the receipt. Undifficult.
And you trust the government to delete them?
When I buy a gun through an FFL today, what record does the government maintain?
Would I be any worse off with my (admittedly pie in the sky) proposal?
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek

hondo44
Banned
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:25 pm

Re: Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick attacks NRA and Supports expanded background checks

#96

Post by hondo44 »

I've never trusted Dan Patrick since the whole Jon Matthews debacle. King Jon was one of the strongest conservative voices on the radio and had his career destroyed over basically nothing. Dan Patrick and his whole RINO liberal constituency needs to go!
Chinese SKS, Yugo SKS, Romanian AK-74, Mossberg 500, Hi-Point 9mm carbine, Colt 2000 IWB

mrvmax
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 2017
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 7:16 pm
Location: Friendswood

Re: Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick attacks NRA and Supports expanded background checks

#97

Post by mrvmax »

RoyGBiv wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2019 9:43 pm
Nuts wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:34 pm
RoyGBiv wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:10 pm
jason812 wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:06 pm
RoyGBiv wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:04 pm Let's help draft a law we can live with....


-- Printed receipt for each party
-- Transaction records immediately deleted
How can you have a printed receipt and delete the transaction records?
The buyer gets a receipt, the seller gets a receipt, the government gets to delete the record after printing the receipt. Undifficult.
And you trust the government to delete them?
When I buy a gun through an FFL today, what record does the government maintain?
Would I be any worse off with my (admittedly pie in the sky) proposal?
The 4473 is kept for 20 years but the FFL can destroy them after that. The ATF encourages the FFL to turn them in instead of destroying them. Some FFLs will shut down their license and get a new one just to avoid having to store 4473’s (in which case the forms are sent to the ATF). During yearly inspections the ATF IOI can gather any info they want off the 4473’s, I’ve had them take someone’s info before during audits (even though there was nothing questionable and after I told him the buyer was legit and had a CHL).

Multiple handgun sales (and multiple long gun sales in border states) forms are sent to the ATF and chief law enforcement officer. Those forms have all the buyers info plus all the firearm info.

Your proposal does nothing to solve the problem and only opens the door to other infringing legislation. As Reagan stated, government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem. I have not seen anything proposed that will stop people from being killed. There has been nothing implemented worldwide that I know of that has stopped killing.
User avatar

tomneal
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1178
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2004 2:26 pm
Location: Houston
Contact:

Re: Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick attacks NRA and Supports expanded background checks

#98

Post by tomneal »

Pie-in-the-sky proposal

One of the problems with ending private transfers is that FFL's charge for transfers.

So, require the transfer to take place WITHOUT CHARGE at EVERY Federal office. :evil2: I mean EVERY Federal prosecutor, FBI Office, Post Office, Park Service, BATFE office, Social Security Office, VA, Federal Court, Military Base, NSA, CIA, etc. Just wonder in with your customer and a gun and have the Feds fill out and keep the 4473. Same rules as a private FFL. Oh, I guess that would mean you could bring a gun into every Federal Building in the United States.

This would have to be WITHOUT CHARGE because it's a constitutional right. If a 'poll tax' is unconstitutional then a 'firearm transfer tax' would be as well.

It must be at EVERY Federal office because you can't force those 'in the sticks' to travel.

You wouldn't even need an ID. 'They' have said you shouldn't need one to vote. :evil2:


Until 1968, someone could commit a Felony, go to prison, and when they got out, they could own firearms. The nation survived.
See you at the range
NRA Life, TSRA Life, USPSA Life, Mensa (not worth $50 per year so it's expired)
Tom (Retired May 2019) Neal

mrvmax
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 2017
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 7:16 pm
Location: Friendswood

Re: Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick attacks NRA and Supports expanded background checks

#99

Post by mrvmax »

tomneal wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2019 8:21 am Pie-in-the-sky proposal

One of the problems with ending private transfers is that FFL's charge for transfers.

So, require the transfer to take place WITHOUT CHARGE at EVERY Federal office. :evil2: I mean EVERY Federal prosecutor, FBI Office, Post Office, Park Service, BATFE office, Social Security Office, VA, Federal Court, Military Base, NSA, CIA, etc. Just wonder in with your customer and a gun and have the Feds fill out and keep the 4473. Same rules as a private FFL. Oh, I guess that would mean you could bring a gun into every Federal Building in the United States.

This would have to be WITHOUT CHARGE because it's a constitutional right. If a 'poll tax' is unconstitutional then a 'firearm transfer tax' would be as well.

It must be at EVERY Federal office because you can't force those 'in the sticks' to travel.

You wouldn't even need an ID. 'They' have said you shouldn't need one to vote. :evil2:


Until 1968, someone could commit a Felony, go to prison, and when they got out, they could own firearms. The nation survived.
Best idea I’ve see or heard.
User avatar

RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 9508
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick attacks NRA and Supports expanded background checks

#100

Post by RoyGBiv »

mrvmax wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2019 5:42 am
RoyGBiv wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2019 9:43 pm
Nuts wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:34 pm
RoyGBiv wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:10 pm
jason812 wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:06 pm
RoyGBiv wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:04 pm Let's help draft a law we can live with....


-- Printed receipt for each party
-- Transaction records immediately deleted
How can you have a printed receipt and delete the transaction records?
The buyer gets a receipt, the seller gets a receipt, the government gets to delete the record after printing the receipt. Undifficult.
And you trust the government to delete them?
When I buy a gun through an FFL today, what record does the government maintain?
Would I be any worse off with my (admittedly pie in the sky) proposal?
The 4473 is kept for 20 years but the FFL can destroy them after that. The ATF encourages the FFL to turn them in instead of destroying them. Some FFLs will shut down their license and get a new one just to avoid having to store 4473’s (in which case the forms are sent to the ATF). During yearly inspections the ATF IOI can gather any info they want off the 4473’s, I’ve had them take someone’s info before during audits (even though there was nothing questionable and after I told him the buyer was legit and had a CHL).

Multiple handgun sales (and multiple long gun sales in border states) forms are sent to the ATF and chief law enforcement officer. Those forms have all the buyers info plus all the firearm info.

Your proposal does nothing to solve the problem and only opens the door to other infringing legislation. As Reagan stated, government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem. I have not seen anything proposed that will stop people from being killed. There has been nothing implemented worldwide that I know of that has stopped killing.
I wasn't trying to solve the violence problem, just trying to satiate the calls for UBC's in a way that is no worse than what exists today. When an FFL runs a NICS check, is a record kept by the FBI? If we pass a law declaring that record must be deleted, I'd say we gained something. 4473 remains unchanged.
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek

Nuts
Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 183
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 7:47 pm

Re: Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick attacks NRA and Supports expanded background checks

#101

Post by Nuts »

RoyGBiv wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2019 11:52 am
mrvmax wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2019 5:42 am
RoyGBiv wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2019 9:43 pm
Nuts wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:34 pm
RoyGBiv wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:10 pm
jason812 wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:06 pm
RoyGBiv wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:04 pm Let's help draft a law we can live with....


-- Printed receipt for each party
-- Transaction records immediately deleted
How can you have a printed receipt and delete the transaction records?
The buyer gets a receipt, the seller gets a receipt, the government gets to delete the record after printing the receipt. Undifficult.
And you trust the government to delete them?
When I buy a gun through an FFL today, what record does the government maintain?
Would I be any worse off with my (admittedly pie in the sky) proposal?
The 4473 is kept for 20 years but the FFL can destroy them after that. The ATF encourages the FFL to turn them in instead of destroying them. Some FFLs will shut down their license and get a new one just to avoid having to store 4473’s (in which case the forms are sent to the ATF). During yearly inspections the ATF IOI can gather any info they want off the 4473’s, I’ve had them take someone’s info before during audits (even though there was nothing questionable and after I told him the buyer was legit and had a CHL).

Multiple handgun sales (and multiple long gun sales in border states) forms are sent to the ATF and chief law enforcement officer. Those forms have all the buyers info plus all the firearm info.

Your proposal does nothing to solve the problem and only opens the door to other infringing legislation. As Reagan stated, government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem. I have not seen anything proposed that will stop people from being killed. There has been nothing implemented worldwide that I know of that has stopped killing.
I wasn't trying to solve the violence problem, just trying to satiate the calls for UBC's in a way that is no worse than what exists today. When an FFL runs a NICS check, is a record kept by the FBI? If we pass a law declaring that record must be deleted, I'd say we gained something. 4473 remains unchanged.

Appeasement never is a good idea in anyway.
User avatar

Flightmare
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 3088
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2016 7:00 pm
Location: Plano, TX

Re: Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick attacks NRA and Supports expanded background checks

#102

Post by Flightmare »

RoyGBiv wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2019 11:52 am I wasn't trying to solve the violence problem, just trying to satiate the calls for UBC's in a way that is no worse than what exists today. When an FFL runs a NICS check, is a record kept by the FBI? If we pass a law declaring that record must be deleted, I'd say we gained something. 4473 remains unchanged.
Let me ask you this. Do you believe that even if they had UBCs and a federal gun registry, that the antis would be satiated?
If so, I have a bridge I'd like to sell you.
If not, what problem are you trying to solve?
Deplorable lunatic since 2016
User avatar

carlson1
Moderator
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 11658
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 1:11 am

Re: Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick attacks NRA and Supports expanded background checks

#103

Post by carlson1 »

Francis said what the whole Democratic Party wants to do. Take all Ar15’s and AK 47’s. The problem is they will not stop there.
Image
User avatar

anygunanywhere
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 7863
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
Location: Richmond, Texas

Re: Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick attacks NRA and Supports expanded background checks

#104

Post by anygunanywhere »

tomneal wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2019 8:21 am Pie-in-the-sky proposal

One of the problems with ending private transfers is that FFL's charge for transfers.

So, require the transfer to take place WITHOUT CHARGE at EVERY Federal office. :evil2: I mean EVERY Federal prosecutor, FBI Office, Post Office, Park Service, BATFE office, Social Security Office, VA, Federal Court, Military Base, NSA, CIA, etc. Just wonder in with your customer and a gun and have the Feds fill out and keep the 4473. Same rules as a private FFL. Oh, I guess that would mean you could bring a gun into every Federal Building in the United States.

This would have to be WITHOUT CHARGE because it's a constitutional right. If a 'poll tax' is unconstitutional then a 'firearm transfer tax' would be as well.

It must be at EVERY Federal office because you can't force those 'in the sticks' to travel.

You wouldn't even need an ID. 'They' have said you shouldn't need one to vote. :evil2:


Until 1968, someone could commit a Felony, go to prison, and when they got out, they could own firearms. The nation survived.
:iagree: x1 bazillion
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh

"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
User avatar

03Lightningrocks
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 11451
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Plano

Re: Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick attacks NRA and Supports expanded background checks

#105

Post by 03Lightningrocks »

RoyGBiv wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2019 11:52 am
I wasn't trying to solve the violence problem, just trying to satiate the calls for UBC's in a way that is no worse than what exists today. When an FFL runs a NICS check, is a record kept by the FBI? If we pass a law declaring that record must be deleted, I'd say we gained something. 4473 remains unchanged.
You have been around long enough to know there ain't no satiate to be had. No matter what we give them now, after the next few shootings they will come after more. Anything the anti's get will ONLY serve to embolden them.
Post Reply

Return to “General Legislative Discussions”