HB 121 - Requires oral notice for 30.06 and 30.07

This sub-forum will open on Sept. 1, 2018

Moderators: Keith B, Charles L. Cotton, carlson1

Post Reply
User avatar

Topic author
PriestTheRunner
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 555
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 5:33 pm

HB 121 - Requires oral notice for 30.06 and 30.07

#1

Post by PriestTheRunner » Tue Nov 13, 2018 4:13 pm

Can somebody explain this one to me...? It looks like a clarification amending subsection H but I can't determine what exactly its doing:

https://capitol.texas.gov/BillLookup/Hi ... Bill=HB121
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT
relating to a defense to prosecution for the offense of trespass by
certain persons carrying handguns.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
SECTION 1. Section 30.06, Penal Code, is amended by adding
Subsection (g) to read as follows:
(g) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that
the license holder was personally given notice by oral
communication described by Subsection (b) and promptly departed
from the property.

SECTION 2. Section 30.07, Penal Code, is amended by adding
Subsection (h) to read as follows:
(h) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that
the license holder was personally given notice by oral
communication described by Subsection (b) and promptly departed
from the property.

SECTION 3. The change in law made by this Act applies only
to an offense committed on or after the effective date of this Act.
An offense committed before the effective date of this Act is
governed by the law in effect on the date the offense was committed,
and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose. For
purposes of this section, an offense was committed before the
effective date of this Act if any element of the offense occurred
before that date.
SECTION 4. This Act takes effect September 1, 2019.


ralewis
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 288
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 12:37 pm

Re: HB 121 - Requires oral notice for 30.06 and 30.07

#2

Post by ralewis » Tue Nov 13, 2018 7:55 pm

PriestTheRunner wrote:
Tue Nov 13, 2018 4:13 pm
Can somebody explain this one to me...? It looks like a clarification amending subsection H but I can't determine what exactly its doing:

https://capitol.texas.gov/BillLookup/Hi ... Bill=HB121
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT
relating to a defense to prosecution for the offense of trespass by
certain persons carrying handguns.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
SECTION 1. Section 30.06, Penal Code, is amended by adding
Subsection (g) to read as follows:
(g) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that
the license holder was personally given notice by oral
communication described by Subsection (b) and promptly departed
from the property.

SECTION 2. Section 30.07, Penal Code, is amended by adding
Subsection (h) to read as follows:
(h) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that
the license holder was personally given notice by oral
communication described by Subsection (b) and promptly departed
from the property.

SECTION 3. The change in law made by this Act applies only
to an offense committed on or after the effective date of this Act.
An offense committed before the effective date of this Act is
governed by the law in effect on the date the offense was committed,
and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose. For
purposes of this section, an offense was committed before the
effective date of this Act if any element of the offense occurred
before that date.
SECTION 4. This Act takes effect September 1, 2019.
Looks to me like you have a 'defense to prosecution' for carrying past a sign as long as you departed if told to.


locke_n_load
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 989
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 3:35 pm

Re: HB 121 - Requires oral notice for 30.06 and 30.07

#3

Post by locke_n_load » Tue Nov 13, 2018 8:58 pm

sounds like you can still get cited if they don't tell your orally and just call the cops.
"They that would give up Essential Liberty, for a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety"

EDC - Glock 26 Gen IV
CHL Holder since 10/08

User avatar

Maxwell
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 888
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2011 2:05 pm

Re: HB 121 - Requires oral notice for 30.06 and 30.07

#4

Post by Maxwell » Wed Nov 14, 2018 11:58 am

For some reason I thought it was always a defense against prosecution if you immediately left when asked.
I never let schooling interfere with my education. Mark Twain

User avatar

oljames3
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3232
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2014 1:21 pm
Location: Elgin, Texas
Contact:

Re: HB 121 - Requires oral notice for 30.06 and 30.07

#5

Post by oljames3 » Wed Nov 14, 2018 12:33 pm

Maxwell wrote:
Wed Nov 14, 2018 11:58 am
For some reason I thought it was always a defense against prosecution if you immediately left when asked.
There is a difference in the offense if the license holder fails to depart, but not a defense against prosecution.

https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs ... /PE.30.htm

30.06 (d) and 30.07 (d) both read:
(d) An offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed $200, except that the offense is a Class A misdemeanor if it is shown on the trial of the offense that, after entering the property, the license holder was personally given the notice by oral communication described by Subsection (b) and subsequently failed to depart.
O. Lee James, III Captain, US Army (Retired 2012), Honorable Order of St. Barbara
2/19FA, 1st Cavalry Division 73-78; 56FA BDE (Pershing) 78-81
NRA Distinguished Life Member (Disabled Vet), TSRA, NAR L1


Soccerdad1995
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 3883
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 8:03 pm

Re: HB 121 - Requires oral notice for 30.06 and 30.07

#6

Post by Soccerdad1995 » Wed Nov 14, 2018 1:25 pm

locke_n_load wrote:
Tue Nov 13, 2018 8:58 pm
sounds like you can still get cited if they don't tell your orally and just call the cops.
Unless the cops give you oral notice and you then leave. I think it has already been established that a LEO has authority to give oral notice in cases where there are no signs, etc.

"Sir, I'm sorry but that sign means you cannot carry in here....."

"Thanks officer, I'd like to leave now. Is that OK?"
Ding dong, the witch is dead

User avatar

Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 17528
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: HB 121 - Requires oral notice for 30.06 and 30.07

#7

Post by Charles L. Cotton » Wed Nov 14, 2018 4:16 pm

locke_n_load wrote:
Tue Nov 13, 2018 8:58 pm
sounds like you can still get cited if they don't tell your orally and just call the cops.
Correct. HB121 will not make oral notice to leave a requirement.

Chas.

User avatar

Topic author
PriestTheRunner
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 555
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 5:33 pm

Re: HB 121 - Requires oral notice for 30.06 and 30.07

#8

Post by PriestTheRunner » Wed Nov 14, 2018 4:19 pm

Charles L. Cotton wrote:
Wed Nov 14, 2018 4:16 pm
locke_n_load wrote:
Tue Nov 13, 2018 8:58 pm
sounds like you can still get cited if they don't tell your orally and just call the cops.
Correct. HB121 will not make oral notice to leave a requirement.

Chas.
Chas, I'm not really understanding what this law changes then? Is it just clarifying the 'leave when asked' provision of the current law as it has been enforced? Basically, it clarifies that you may be guilty of Class C Misd. if passing the sign but are not guilty of Class A until asked and refusing to leave?

If the law is already applied that way, why is this one needed?

Thanks


Papa_Tiger
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 689
Joined: Fri May 24, 2013 9:55 am

Re: HB 121 - Requires oral notice for 30.06 and 30.07

#9

Post by Papa_Tiger » Tue Apr 09, 2019 2:40 pm

HB 121 passed to engrossment in the House today.


proudpirate
Banned
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:39 am

Re: HB 121 - Requires oral notice for 30.06 and 30.07

#10

Post by proudpirate » Tue Apr 09, 2019 2:56 pm

Here's to hoping it dies in the Texas Senate.


Papa_Tiger
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 689
Joined: Fri May 24, 2013 9:55 am

Re: HB 121 - Requires oral notice for 30.06 and 30.07

#11

Post by Papa_Tiger » Tue Apr 09, 2019 3:13 pm

proudpirate wrote:
Tue Apr 09, 2019 2:56 pm
Here's to hoping it dies in the Texas Senate.
Why would you hope that a bill that provides a defense to prosecution if you are told to leave (TPC 30.06 and 30.07) and you promptly depart dies in the Senate?

This isn't a sweeping bill, but closes a loophole DAs could use to prosecute you (Class C misdemeanor and up to $200 fine) even if you promptly departed after being given oral notice.

User avatar

ELB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 7195
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: Seguin

Re: HB 121 - Requires oral notice for 30.06 and 30.07

#12

Post by ELB » Tue Apr 09, 2019 3:18 pm

As I read it, it creates a defense to prosecution if you are personally asked to leave, you comply, but you are charged anyway.

As it stands now, there is no defense to prosecution if you leave when asked; leaving only affects the level of offense.

This is what Mr. Cotton put on his list of 2A bills:
HB 121: (Swanson, R,A) “Relating to a defense to prosecution for the offense of trespass by certain persons carrying handguns.”
Impact: The Bill creates a defense to prosecution for violation of TPC §§30.06 or 30.07, if the defendant was told to leave the property and the defendant did so.
Position on Bill: Support.
Status: Filed 11/12/2018
Comments: Currently, an oral notification to leave impacts the level of offense (Class C v. Class A). This Bill would extend that concept to create a defense to prosecution if the Licensee complied with an instruction to leave the premises. It does not create a requirement for oral notification.
I don't know why you want this bill to die. With the Speaker's "friends" in charge, we are only going to get crumbs this session, we might as well get as many as possible.
USAF 1982-2005
____________
“The only thing more enjoyable than seeing your opponent lose an election they rigged is seeing them lose an investigation they rigged.” Author unknown but dead on the mark.


proudpirate
Banned
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:39 am

Re: HB 121 - Requires oral notice for 30.06 and 30.07

#13

Post by proudpirate » Tue Apr 09, 2019 4:14 pm

ELB wrote:
Tue Apr 09, 2019 3:18 pm
As I read it, it creates a defense to prosecution if you are personally asked to leave, you comply, but you are charged anyway.

As it stands now, there is no defense to prosecution if you leave when asked; leaving only affects the level of offense.

This is what Mr. Cotton put on his list of 2A bills:
HB 121: (Swanson, R,A) “Relating to a defense to prosecution for the offense of trespass by certain persons carrying handguns.”
Impact: The Bill creates a defense to prosecution for violation of TPC §§30.06 or 30.07, if the defendant was told to leave the property and the defendant did so.
Position on Bill: Support.
Status: Filed 11/12/2018
Comments: Currently, an oral notification to leave impacts the level of offense (Class C v. Class A). This Bill would extend that concept to create a defense to prosecution if the Licensee complied with an instruction to leave the premises. It does not create a requirement for oral notification.
I don't know why you want this bill to die. With the Speaker's "friends" in charge, we are only going to get crumbs this session, we might as well get as many as possible.
I guess I mis-read the bill. Now that I read through it again I get it now. Sorry my bad.


Soccerdad1995
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 3883
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 8:03 pm

Re: HB 121 - Requires oral notice for 30.06 and 30.07

#14

Post by Soccerdad1995 » Tue Apr 09, 2019 4:17 pm

ELB wrote:
Tue Apr 09, 2019 3:18 pm
As I read it, it creates a defense to prosecution if you are personally asked to leave, you comply, but you are charged anyway.

As it stands now, there is no defense to prosecution if you leave when asked; leaving only affects the level of offense.

This is what Mr. Cotton put on his list of 2A bills:
HB 121: (Swanson, R,A) “Relating to a defense to prosecution for the offense of trespass by certain persons carrying handguns.”
Impact: The Bill creates a defense to prosecution for violation of TPC §§30.06 or 30.07, if the defendant was told to leave the property and the defendant did so.
Position on Bill: Support.
Status: Filed 11/12/2018
Comments: Currently, an oral notification to leave impacts the level of offense (Class C v. Class A). This Bill would extend that concept to create a defense to prosecution if the Licensee complied with an instruction to leave the premises. It does not create a requirement for oral notification.
I don't know why you want this bill to die. With the Speaker's "friends" in charge, we are only going to get crumbs this session, we might as well get as many as possible.
:iagree:

While hard to follow, it appears that this bill is a net win, albeit a small one, for LTC holders.
Ding dong, the witch is dead

Post Reply

Return to “2019 Texas Legislative Session”