Does Using an NFA Item in a Personal Defense Situation Put You in More Legal Jeopardy?

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

Post Reply
User avatar

Topic author
Paladin
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 6290
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:02 pm
Location: DFW

Does Using an NFA Item in a Personal Defense Situation Put You in More Legal Jeopardy?

#1

Post by Paladin »

JOIN NRA TODAY!, NRA Benefactor Life, TSRA Defender Life, Gun Owners of America Life, SAF, FPC, VCDL Member
LTC/SSC Instructor, NRA Certified Instructor, CRSO
The last hope of human liberty in this world rests on us. -Thomas Jefferson

parabelum
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2717
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2015 12:22 pm

Re: Does Using an NFA Item in a Personal Defense Situation Put You in More Legal Jeopardy?

#2

Post by parabelum »

:mrgreen: What if you just use suppressor as a club in self defense
User avatar

LSUTiger
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1139
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 2:36 pm

Re: Does Using an NFA Item in a Personal Defense Situation Put You in More Legal Jeopardy?

#3

Post by LSUTiger »

I am not a lawyer and do not interpret anything I say as legal advice.

I think there are three questions that arise when and NFA device is used in a Self Defense situation:

1. Were you legally justified in Self Defense? In another words same rules apply as any other situation/non-NFA device.
2. Were you in legal possession of the NFA device?
3. Mitigating or Aggravation circumstances.

Of course the prosecution, if it goes to trial, will try to use it or anything against you to make you look bad but I don't think legally there is anything about NFA items that prohibits you from using them in Self Defense.

You also risk the loss of the item as any other.

Someone, anyone, please correct me if I am wrong.
Chance favors the prepared. Making good people helpless doesn't make bad people harmless.
There is no safety in denial. When seconds count the Police are only minutes away.
Sometimes I really wish a lawyer would chime in and clear things up. Do we have any lawyers on this forum?
User avatar

Topic author
Paladin
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 6290
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:02 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Does Using an NFA Item in a Personal Defense Situation Put You in More Legal Jeopardy?

#4

Post by Paladin »

Criminal Use of Firearm Silencers
In federal prosecutions, a defendant can be charged with possession of a silencer during a crime, which carries a 30-year sentence, and if the silencer is homemade and not licenced or serial numbered, persons convicted of these offenses can receive up to 10 years as well (U. S. v. Frazier, 213 F.3d 409 (7th Cir. 2000)).
JOIN NRA TODAY!, NRA Benefactor Life, TSRA Defender Life, Gun Owners of America Life, SAF, FPC, VCDL Member
LTC/SSC Instructor, NRA Certified Instructor, CRSO
The last hope of human liberty in this world rests on us. -Thomas Jefferson

srothstein
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5273
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
Location: Luling, TX

Re: Does Using an NFA Item in a Personal Defense Situation Put You in More Legal Jeopardy?

#5

Post by srothstein »

I think it depends on the NFA device how much jeopardy it can put you in. For example, a silencer used on a firearm should not make any difference to the justification or use of force. But, a sawed off shotgun might be a different position. The most important possibility I can see where it makes a difference would be a fully automatic weapon. We have already seen cases where a person was justified in using deadly force, but too many shots fired made it excessive force. I would think an automatic weapon would make this much more likely. While you might justify the first shot or even two, can you justify 15 when the last three or four were after the suspect was on the ground? I am not sure if a destructive weapon, say a .700 elephant gun, would make a difference over a smaller weapon.
Steve Rothstein

powerboatr
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2273
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:53 pm
Location: North East Texas

Re: Does Using an NFA Item in a Personal Defense Situation Put You in More Legal Jeopardy?

#6

Post by powerboatr »

srothstein wrote: Thu Aug 18, 2022 8:13 pm I think it depends on the NFA device how much jeopardy it can put you in. For example, a silencer used on a firearm should not make any difference to the justification or use of force. But, a sawed off shotgun might be a different position. The most important possibility I can see where it makes a difference would be a fully automatic weapon. We have already seen cases where a person was justified in using deadly force, but too many shots fired made it excessive force. I would think an automatic weapon would make this much more likely. While you might justify the first shot or even two, can you justify 15 when the last three or four were after the suspect was on the ground? I am not sure if a destructive weapon, say a .700 elephant gun, would make a difference over a smaller weapon.
too many shots fired?
didnt maya angelou shoot the intruder in the chest then in the head becasue she wanted to ensure he stayed put?

i was always taught to stop putting bullet in the bad person once they stopped having the ability to get up or move. in my case i am not a doctor, so chest, followed by head if it still moves. if i am scared and it takes 16 shots or 3 so be it

and yes DA's are a sneaky bunch and could see why did you put 3 in the bad guy questions??
very good question
Proud to have served for over 22 Years in the U.S. Navy Certificated FAA A&P technician since 1996

clarionite
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 886
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 10:09 pm

Re: Does Using an NFA Item in a Personal Defense Situation Put You in More Legal Jeopardy?

#7

Post by clarionite »

powerboatr wrote: Thu Aug 18, 2022 8:40 pm
srothstein wrote: Thu Aug 18, 2022 8:13 pm I think it depends on the NFA device how much jeopardy it can put you in. For example, a silencer used on a firearm should not make any difference to the justification or use of force. But, a sawed off shotgun might be a different position. The most important possibility I can see where it makes a difference would be a fully automatic weapon. We have already seen cases where a person was justified in using deadly force, but too many shots fired made it excessive force. I would think an automatic weapon would make this much more likely. While you might justify the first shot or even two, can you justify 15 when the last three or four were after the suspect was on the ground? I am not sure if a destructive weapon, say a .700 elephant gun, would make a difference over a smaller weapon.
too many shots fired?
didnt maya angelou shoot the intruder in the chest then in the head becasue she wanted to ensure he stayed put?

i was always taught to stop putting bullet in the bad person once they stopped having the ability to get up or move. in my case i am not a doctor, so chest, followed by head if it still moves. if i am scared and it takes 16 shots or 3 so be it

and yes DA's are a sneaky bunch and could see why did you put 3 in the bad guy questions??
very good question
I've always liked the (Probably made up) anecdote about the prosecutor saying why did you shot him x times? And the response of, well when I pulled the trigger the x+1th time it just went click.

But I tell my students to shoot to remove the threat. Since you're only justified to shoot if there's a threat to someone's life, then when that threat is gone you've gone to far if you keep shooting.

RSX11
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 189
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 5:26 pm

Re: Does Using an NFA Item in a Personal Defense Situation Put You in More Legal Jeopardy?

#8

Post by RSX11 »

[I've always liked the (Probably made up) anecdote about the prosecutor saying why did you shot him x times? And the response of, well when I pulled the trigger the x+1th time it just went click.
/quote]

Reminds me of a case quite a while back in Houstomn, where a cop shot a goblin 13 times. The joke went "heck, if he'd had 4 more rounds, he could have finished writing his name in bullets".

About the same time when the Houston police chief was asked by a reporter, who was upset to have learned that some Houston cops were armed with model 29s, why were some Houston cops carrying .44 Magnums as duty weapons. He replied "Because that's the biggest thing they can get".
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 26790
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Does Using an NFA Item in a Personal Defense Situation Put You in More Legal Jeopardy?

#9

Post by The Annoyed Man »

srothstein wrote: Thu Aug 18, 2022 8:13 pm I think it depends on the NFA device how much jeopardy it can put you in. For example, a silencer used on a firearm should not make any difference to the justification or use of force. But, a sawed off shotgun might be a different position. The most important possibility I can see where it makes a difference would be a fully automatic weapon. We have already seen cases where a person was justified in using deadly force, but too many shots fired made it excessive force. I would think an automatic weapon would make this much more likely. While you might justify the first shot or even two, can you justify 15 when the last three or four were after the suspect was on the ground? I am not sure if a destructive weapon, say a .700 elephant gun, would make a difference over a smaller weapon.
Both of my primary home-defense weapons (a G17 and a SBRed AR) have a suppressor attached, and there’s a very simple explanation. Shooting a gun inside a house is freakin' LOUD!!, and I’ve already lost hearing in one ear. I really don’t want to damage my hearing any worse. Although I prefer to use a suppressor at the range, I don’t always do it because some of my rifles and most of my pistols lack either a threaded barrel or a suppressor mount.

But when I do keep a rifle in my vehicle, it is unsuppressed for exactly these kinds of reasons. What I might have to do inside of my house is a lot easier to defend than what I might have to do on the street. Now, if TEOTWAWKI arises, then I won’t worry about that stuff.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar

Rafe
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1984
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 7:43 pm
Location: Htown

Re: Does Using an NFA Item in a Personal Defense Situation Put You in More Legal Jeopardy?

#10

Post by Rafe »

After reading this thread, I'm thinking I need to retire my home defense system and look at choosing something else. I'm thinking that running a suppressed, full-auto, .700 Nitro Express may not be the best idea...
:biggrinjester:

It's Steve's fault! He mentioned a .700 caliber! In this video, of course, the shooter only has a measly double-barrel hunting gun: no full-auto, no suppressor... :mrgreen:

“Be ready; now is the beginning of happenings.”
― Robert E. Howard, Swords of Shahrazar
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”