ARMED CITIZEN ARMORY

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

User avatar

oljames3
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 5350
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2014 1:21 pm
Location: Elgin, Texas
Contact:

Re: ARMED CITIZEN ARMORY

#61

Post by oljames3 »

58 subscribers.
O. Lee James, III Captain, US Army (Retired 2012), Honorable Order of St. Barbara
2/19FA, 1st Cavalry Division 73-78; 56FA BDE (Pershing) 78-81
NRA, NRA Basic Pistol Shooting Instructor, Rangemaster Certified, GOA, TSRA, NAR L1

Topic author
montgomery
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 33
Posts: 446
Joined: Sun May 31, 2015 8:13 am
Location: Montgomery, Texas

Re: ARMED CITIZEN ARMORY

#62

Post by montgomery »

puma guy wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2019 9:25 am Done, but forgot to post. I think I was #7.
My friend thanks all y'all!!

Topic author
montgomery
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 33
Posts: 446
Joined: Sun May 31, 2015 8:13 am
Location: Montgomery, Texas

Re: ARMED CITIZEN ARMORY

#63

Post by montgomery »

DynamicDan wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2019 12:45 pm I subscribed
:cheers2: Thanks Dan!

Topic author
montgomery
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 33
Posts: 446
Joined: Sun May 31, 2015 8:13 am
Location: Montgomery, Texas

Re: ARMED CITIZEN ARMORY

#64

Post by montgomery »

1wise1 wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2019 12:44 am Count me in; number 56
Thanks!! Love your profile picture!!

:txflag:

Topic author
montgomery
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 33
Posts: 446
Joined: Sun May 31, 2015 8:13 am
Location: Montgomery, Texas

Re: ARMED CITIZEN ARMORY

#65

Post by montgomery »

JustSomeOldGuy wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2019 11:57 am Subscribed. Didn't notice what number....
Y'all #1 - thank you so much!!

:tiphat:

flechero
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3486
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 5:04 pm
Location: Central Texas

Re: ARMED CITIZEN ARMORY

#66

Post by flechero »

#59 here! Hope it's good! :lol:

Topic author
montgomery
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 33
Posts: 446
Joined: Sun May 31, 2015 8:13 am
Location: Montgomery, Texas

Re: ARMED CITIZEN ARMORY

#67

Post by montgomery »

flechero wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2019 2:00 pm #59 here! Hope it's good! :lol:
Thank you Flechero!! It is going to be great!!

:cheers2:
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 26796
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: ARMED CITIZEN ARMORY

#68

Post by The Annoyed Man »

MAC just posted on Patreon that YouTube just removed his "verified" status. He’s only got 975K subscribers...

C0CAB07C-22E4-4A66-906D-92D3D2E2A6F9.png
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar

Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 17787
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: ARMED CITIZEN ARMORY

#69

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

The Annoyed Man wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2019 12:12 pm MAC just posted on Patreon that YouTube just removed his "verified" status. He’s only got 975K subscribers...


C0CAB07C-22E4-4A66-906D-92D3D2E2A6F9.png
Something needs to be done about YouTube censoring speech. Yes, it's a private company, but elected officials use it to communicate with the public and their constituents. There is a case prohibiting elected officials from banning posters from their Facebook accounts, when such accounts are used by elected officials for non-personal posting. I think that concept could be expanded to include all social media outlets used by elected officials. Otherwise, it will be quite easy to sway public opinion based upon who YouTube/Instagram/Facebook, etc. allow to post.

Chas.
User avatar

longhorn86
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 383
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 5:49 pm
Location: Schertz, TX

Re: ARMED CITIZEN ARMORY

#70

Post by longhorn86 »

Subscribed. 60 down, 40 to go!

Good luck!!
NRA Life Member

Topic author
montgomery
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 33
Posts: 446
Joined: Sun May 31, 2015 8:13 am
Location: Montgomery, Texas

Re: ARMED CITIZEN ARMORY

#71

Post by montgomery »

longhorn86 wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2019 2:29 pm Subscribed. 60 down, 40 to go!

Good luck!!
Thank you very kindly!

:woohoo

Topic author
montgomery
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 33
Posts: 446
Joined: Sun May 31, 2015 8:13 am
Location: Montgomery, Texas

Re: ARMED CITIZEN ARMORY

#72

Post by montgomery »

The Annoyed Man wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2019 12:12 pm MAC just posted on Patreon that YouTube just removed his "verified" status. He’s only got 975K subscribers...


C0CAB07C-22E4-4A66-906D-92D3D2E2A6F9.png
To clarify, my friend's Armed Citizen Armory is not going to be another youtube channel ... it is a website with relevant content for home defense and concealed carry to folks relatively new to firearms and carry.

The YouTube channel is part of the social media marketing only - all videos will be hosted on the main ACA website. He is just looking to publish a clean /ArmedCitizenArmory URL by first satisfying the 100 subscriber minimum to dump the current URL of /UCQZW9D-Ix1fUYJvYZ7S27Pg
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 26796
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: ARMED CITIZEN ARMORY

#73

Post by The Annoyed Man »

The Annoyed Man wrote: Mon Sep 09, 2019 8:43 pm Done.
5 months later, and still no content, and only 53 subscribers. Unsubscribed.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT

crazy2medic
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2453
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2015 9:59 am

Re: ARMED CITIZEN ARMORY

#74

Post by crazy2medic »

Charles L. Cotton wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2019 2:05 pm
The Annoyed Man wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2019 12:12 pm MAC just posted on Patreon that YouTube just removed his "verified" status. He’s only got 975K subscribers...


C0CAB07C-22E4-4A66-906D-92D3D2E2A6F9.png
Something needs to be done about YouTube censoring speech. Yes, it's a private company, but elected officials use it to communicate with the public and their constituents. There is a case prohibiting elected officials from banning posters from their Facebook accounts, when such accounts are used by elected officials for non-personal posting. I think that concept could be expanded to include all social media outlets used by elected officials. Otherwise, it will be quite easy to sway public opinion based upon who YouTube/Instagram/Facebook, etc. allow to post.

Chas.
If your providing a public service such as gas, water, electricity, what prevents a public utility from "censoring" somebody their service? What's the difference from a CEO from turning off your water for political reason from removing your web page from their server for political reasons?
Government, like fire is a dangerous servant and a fearful master
If you ain't paranoid you ain't paying attention
Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war let it begin here- John Parker
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”