Is this fast?
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 7
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 10:27 am
- Location: Dripping Springs
Is this fast?
how does 2850 FPS sound for a 208gr .30cal bullet?
Fast, or slow?
This is out of my 300 RUM...
Thanks
Fast, or slow?
This is out of my 300 RUM...
Thanks
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 12329
- Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 3:31 pm
- Location: Angelina County
I think that is awful fast w/ that heavy a bullet.
Who makes the 208 gr bullet???
Who makes the 208 gr bullet???
Carry 24-7 or guess right.
CHL Instructor. http://www.pdtraining.us" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
NRA/TSRA Life Member - TFC Member #11
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 7
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 10:27 am
- Location: Dripping Springs
Hornady.. the 208gr A-Max... B.C. 0.650
It is a new product. So there is no data out on the bullet/powder/cartridge I am using. Right now I am pushing it with 98 grains of Hodgdon US869. There are currently no signs of overpressure (that I see). I am considering moving to a higher charge after I test a few more rounds [abbreviated profanity deleted] consistancy.
It is a new product. So there is no data out on the bullet/powder/cartridge I am using. Right now I am pushing it with 98 grains of Hodgdon US869. There are currently no signs of overpressure (that I see). I am considering moving to a higher charge after I test a few more rounds [abbreviated profanity deleted] consistancy.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 397
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:25 pm
- Location: Las Cruces, NM
- Contact:
According to the Hornady manual, 2800 fps/208gr isn't all that fast from a .300 RUM. The heavier 220gr bullet is listed as being safely driven to 3000 fps (and the 190gr up to 3200 fps); I imagine you could probably hit 3100 fps/208gr with the right powder/barrel length combination pretty easily.
My question is, "What ARE you hunting?!?" I can't imagine any game in Texas that couldn't be taken with a .300 Savage and a 150-grain bullet (much less any game in North America).
Or are you hot-rodding this for the same reason I hot-rod .45 LC loads in a Ruger - the "Because I can and it's fun" reason? Either way, good luck and safe loading!
My question is, "What ARE you hunting?!?" I can't imagine any game in Texas that couldn't be taken with a .300 Savage and a 150-grain bullet (much less any game in North America).
Or are you hot-rodding this for the same reason I hot-rod .45 LC loads in a Ruger - the "Because I can and it's fun" reason? Either way, good luck and safe loading!
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 1394
- Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 2:03 pm
- Location: Central TX, just west of Austin
I don't have my notebook in front of me right now, but based on what I remember getting with the 200 grain Partition, I'd say that's about 200 ft/sec faster than what I'd be able to comfortably get out of the 22" barrel of my .30/06.
I don't think your load is fully up to the .300 RUM's potential, but it should do for anything in North America . . . and most of what's in Africa, too. (But then, so will the .30/06.)
I don't think your load is fully up to the .300 RUM's potential, but it should do for anything in North America . . . and most of what's in Africa, too. (But then, so will the .30/06.)
Original CHL: 2000: 56 day turnaround
1st renewal, 2004: 34 days
2nd renewal, 2008: 81 days
3rd renewal, 2013: 12 days
1st renewal, 2004: 34 days
2nd renewal, 2008: 81 days
3rd renewal, 2013: 12 days
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 7
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 10:27 am
- Location: Dripping Springs
"According to the Hornady manual, 2800 fps/208gr isn't all that fast from a .300 RUM. The heavier 220gr bullet is listed as being safely driven to 3000 fps (and the 190gr up to 3200 fps); I imagine you could probably hit 3100 fps/208gr with the right powder/barrel length combination pretty easily."
This is what I am thinking... I just wanted another opinion. It is a Remmington with a 26'' Factory barrel. and muzzle break (of coarse)
I am neck sizing only, anyone know if there is any major problem with this? I have heard a lot of stories about the case getting to long to the shoulder... I haven't seen much if any OAL case length expansion. less than a thousandth, of coarse I have only fired the cases twice.
"My question is, "What ARE you hunting?!?" I can't imagine any game in Texas that couldn't be taken with a .300 Savage and a 150-grain bullet (much less any game in North America). "
I plan on hunting...anything . mostly paper though. the amax isnt really a hunting projectile, but at those speeds I'm sure it could still kill.
This is what I am thinking... I just wanted another opinion. It is a Remmington with a 26'' Factory barrel. and muzzle break (of coarse)
I am neck sizing only, anyone know if there is any major problem with this? I have heard a lot of stories about the case getting to long to the shoulder... I haven't seen much if any OAL case length expansion. less than a thousandth, of coarse I have only fired the cases twice.
"My question is, "What ARE you hunting?!?" I can't imagine any game in Texas that couldn't be taken with a .300 Savage and a 150-grain bullet (much less any game in North America). "
I plan on hunting...anything . mostly paper though. the amax isnt really a hunting projectile, but at those speeds I'm sure it could still kill.
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 7
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 10:27 am
- Location: Dripping Springs
jjj
Hey What conclusions can be drawn from this data??
Looks to me that 2980-3000fps is all I can get even if I keep adding mor of this powder. I would guess there is not much reason to go over 99-99.5 grains. Is this what you guys gather? Thanks.
Cartridge Load Information
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Load Name: 300RUM-004
Bullet Mfg: Hornady
Bullet Type: #30732 A-Max
Bullet Caliber: .308
Bullet Weight: 208
Ballistic Coeff: 0.650
Powder Mfg: Hodgdon
Powder Type: US869
Powder Weight: 98.5 - 100.8
Primer Mfg: REMINGTON
Primer Size: 9 1/2 LRM
Case Mfg: Remmington
Case # Times Loaded: 1
Cartridge OAL: 3.830
Av. Group Velocity: 2977
Cartridge Mfg Date: 5/20/07
Cartridge Lot Number: 004
Moly Coated: No
Crimped: No
Shot String Data FPS Type of Powder Grains of powder
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
# 1) Velocity: 2945 Powder us869 98.5
# 2) Velocity: 2948 Powder us869 98.7
# 3) Velocity: 2948 Powder us869 98.9
# 4) Velocity: 3008 Powder us869 99.0
# 5) Velocity: 2984 Powder us869 99.1
# 6) Velocity: 2986 Powder us869 99.2
# 7) Velocity: 2999 Powder us869 99.3
# 8) Velocity: 2986 Powder us869 99.4
# 9) Velocity: 2981 Powder us869 99.5
#10) Velocity: 2983 Powder us869 99.6
#11) Velocity: 2988 Powder us869 99.7
#12) Velocity: 2992 Powder us869 99.8
#13) Velocity: 2980 Powder us869 99.9
#14) Velocity: 3003 Powder us869 100.0
#15) Velocity: 2980 Powder us869 100.1
#16) Velocity: 3003 Powder us869 100.2
#17) Velocity: 2994 Powder us869 100.3
#18) Velocity: 2982 Powder us869 100.4
#19) Velocity: 2972 Powder us869 100.5
#20) Velocity: 2968 Powder us869 100.6
#21) Velocity: 3002 Powder us869 100.7
#22) Velocity: 2979 Powder us869 100.8
Looks to me that 2980-3000fps is all I can get even if I keep adding mor of this powder. I would guess there is not much reason to go over 99-99.5 grains. Is this what you guys gather? Thanks.
Cartridge Load Information
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Load Name: 300RUM-004
Bullet Mfg: Hornady
Bullet Type: #30732 A-Max
Bullet Caliber: .308
Bullet Weight: 208
Ballistic Coeff: 0.650
Powder Mfg: Hodgdon
Powder Type: US869
Powder Weight: 98.5 - 100.8
Primer Mfg: REMINGTON
Primer Size: 9 1/2 LRM
Case Mfg: Remmington
Case # Times Loaded: 1
Cartridge OAL: 3.830
Av. Group Velocity: 2977
Cartridge Mfg Date: 5/20/07
Cartridge Lot Number: 004
Moly Coated: No
Crimped: No
Shot String Data FPS Type of Powder Grains of powder
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
# 1) Velocity: 2945 Powder us869 98.5
# 2) Velocity: 2948 Powder us869 98.7
# 3) Velocity: 2948 Powder us869 98.9
# 4) Velocity: 3008 Powder us869 99.0
# 5) Velocity: 2984 Powder us869 99.1
# 6) Velocity: 2986 Powder us869 99.2
# 7) Velocity: 2999 Powder us869 99.3
# 8) Velocity: 2986 Powder us869 99.4
# 9) Velocity: 2981 Powder us869 99.5
#10) Velocity: 2983 Powder us869 99.6
#11) Velocity: 2988 Powder us869 99.7
#12) Velocity: 2992 Powder us869 99.8
#13) Velocity: 2980 Powder us869 99.9
#14) Velocity: 3003 Powder us869 100.0
#15) Velocity: 2980 Powder us869 100.1
#16) Velocity: 3003 Powder us869 100.2
#17) Velocity: 2994 Powder us869 100.3
#18) Velocity: 2982 Powder us869 100.4
#19) Velocity: 2972 Powder us869 100.5
#20) Velocity: 2968 Powder us869 100.6
#21) Velocity: 3002 Powder us869 100.7
#22) Velocity: 2979 Powder us869 100.8
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 7:50 am
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 7
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 10:27 am
- Location: Dripping Springs
What would you guys think if you saw that data:
Am I doing somthing wrong, why is my velocity not consistantly increasing? OAL within 1 thousandth'', powder measured to tenth of grain. Primer pockets cleaned, reamed, etc.
"Shot String Data FPS Type of Powder Grains of powder
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
# 1) Velocity: 2945 Powder us869 98.5
# 2) Velocity: 2948 Powder us869 98.7
# 3) Velocity: 2948 Powder us869 98.9
# 4) Velocity: 3008 Powder us869 99.0
# 5) Velocity: 2984 Powder us869 99.1
# 6) Velocity: 2986 Powder us869 99.2
# 7) Velocity: 2999 Powder us869 99.3
# 8) Velocity: 2986 Powder us869 99.4
# 9) Velocity: 2981 Powder us869 99.5
#10) Velocity: 2983 Powder us869 99.6
#11) Velocity: 2988 Powder us869 99.7
#12) Velocity: 2992 Powder us869 99.8
#13) Velocity: 2980 Powder us869 99.9
#14) Velocity: 3003 Powder us869 100.0
#15) Velocity: 2980 Powder us869 100.1
#16) Velocity: 3003 Powder us869 100.2
#17) Velocity: 2994 Powder us869 100.3
#18) Velocity: 2982 Powder us869 100.4
#19) Velocity: 2972 Powder us869 100.5
#20) Velocity: 2968 Powder us869 100.6
#21) Velocity: 3002 Powder us869 100.7
#22) Velocity: 2979 Powder us869 100.8"
Am I doing somthing wrong, why is my velocity not consistantly increasing? OAL within 1 thousandth'', powder measured to tenth of grain. Primer pockets cleaned, reamed, etc.
"Shot String Data FPS Type of Powder Grains of powder
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
# 1) Velocity: 2945 Powder us869 98.5
# 2) Velocity: 2948 Powder us869 98.7
# 3) Velocity: 2948 Powder us869 98.9
# 4) Velocity: 3008 Powder us869 99.0
# 5) Velocity: 2984 Powder us869 99.1
# 6) Velocity: 2986 Powder us869 99.2
# 7) Velocity: 2999 Powder us869 99.3
# 8) Velocity: 2986 Powder us869 99.4
# 9) Velocity: 2981 Powder us869 99.5
#10) Velocity: 2983 Powder us869 99.6
#11) Velocity: 2988 Powder us869 99.7
#12) Velocity: 2992 Powder us869 99.8
#13) Velocity: 2980 Powder us869 99.9
#14) Velocity: 3003 Powder us869 100.0
#15) Velocity: 2980 Powder us869 100.1
#16) Velocity: 3003 Powder us869 100.2
#17) Velocity: 2994 Powder us869 100.3
#18) Velocity: 2982 Powder us869 100.4
#19) Velocity: 2972 Powder us869 100.5
#20) Velocity: 2968 Powder us869 100.6
#21) Velocity: 3002 Powder us869 100.7
#22) Velocity: 2979 Powder us869 100.8"
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 1394
- Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 2:03 pm
- Location: Central TX, just west of Austin
If you're firing one shot at each level, with only 0.2 or 0.1 grain increments in that big case, you're not getting any statistically meaningful data - the incremental velocity increase for adjacent loads is well within the normal extreme spread you'd expect for either load.
Try firing 5 or 10 rounds at, say, 99.0 grains, and then repeating at 100.0 grains.
At some point, you're likely to find that velocity increases for incremental powder increases diminish . . . that would be an indication that you're at or near the limit for that combination of components.
Try firing 5 or 10 rounds at, say, 99.0 grains, and then repeating at 100.0 grains.
At some point, you're likely to find that velocity increases for incremental powder increases diminish . . . that would be an indication that you're at or near the limit for that combination of components.
Original CHL: 2000: 56 day turnaround
1st renewal, 2004: 34 days
2nd renewal, 2008: 81 days
3rd renewal, 2013: 12 days
1st renewal, 2004: 34 days
2nd renewal, 2008: 81 days
3rd renewal, 2013: 12 days
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 362
- Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:37 pm
- Location: Houston, TX