Question on sign at local hospital.
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Re: Question on sign at local hospital.
No, it's not the current required posting. It may have been prior to the 30.06 sign requirements.
here are the details,
Penal Code Section 30.06(c)(3)(B) further states that a sign must meet the following requirements:
includes the language described by Paragraph (A) in both English and Spanish;
appears in contrasting colors with block letters at least one inch in height; and
is displayed in a conspicuous manner clearly visible to the public.
The letter also have to be a minimum of 1 inch tall and on a contrasting background.In order to provide notice that entry on property by a license holder with a concealed handgun is forbidden, Penal Code Section 30.06(c)(3)(A) requires that a written communication contain the following language:
"PURSUANT TO SECTION 30.06, PENAL CODE (TRESPASS BY HOLDER OF A LICENSE TO CARRY A CONCEALED HANDGUN) A PERSON LICENSED UNDER SUBCHAPTER H, CHAPTER 411, GOVERNMENT CODE (CONCEALED HANDGUN LAW), MAY NOT ENTER THIS PROPERTY WITH A CONCEALED HANDGUN."
"CONFORME A LA SECCIÓN 30.06 DEL CÔDIGO PENAL (TRASPASAR PORTANDO ARMAS DE FUEGO) PERSONAS CON LICENCIA BAJO DEL SUB-CAPITULO H, CAPITULO 411, CODIGO DE GOBIERNO (LEY DE PORTAR ARMAS), NO DEBEN ENTRAR A ESTA PROPIEDAD PORTANDO UN ARMA DE FUEGO."
here are the details,
Penal Code Section 30.06(c)(3)(B) further states that a sign must meet the following requirements:
includes the language described by Paragraph (A) in both English and Spanish;
appears in contrasting colors with block letters at least one inch in height; and
is displayed in a conspicuous manner clearly visible to the public.
Last edited by Rebel on Tue Jul 05, 2011 2:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Question on sign at local hospital.
Old sign quoting Vernon's Civil Code. No longer valid, but the hospital and even police may still believe it is.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member
Psalm 82:3-4
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member
Psalm 82:3-4
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 1184
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 10:13 am
- Location: Central TX
- Contact:
Re: Question on sign at local hospital.
It is not illegal. They can post any sign they want. Enforceable? That is a different question. It does not conform to the legal requirements.
No State shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and charge a fee therefor. -- Murdock v. Pennsylvania
If the State converts a right into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right with impunity. -- Shuttleworth v. City of Birmingham
If the State converts a right into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right with impunity. -- Shuttleworth v. City of Birmingham
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 3:58 pm
- Location: Wellington, TX
- Contact:
Re: Question on sign at local hospital.
IMO, whether the sign is "legal" or not, they have made their "intent" and you have been "given notice".
Better to keep your guns away from this place and save possible grief & inconvenience... Much easier and cheaper than defending your self in Court, IMO.
Better to keep your guns away from this place and save possible grief & inconvenience... Much easier and cheaper than defending your self in Court, IMO.
Running Arrow Farm, LLC
Wellington, TX. 79095
longhorncattle2013@gmail.ocom
Registered Texas Longhorn Cattle
Wellington, TX. 79095
longhorncattle2013@gmail.ocom
Registered Texas Longhorn Cattle
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 3241
- Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 9:51 pm
- Location: Houston, Texas
Re: Question on sign at local hospital.
Isn't that a whole lot like saying a gunbusters sign is "notice" or "intent"?Running Arrow Bill wrote:IMO, whether the sign is "legal" or not, they have made their "intent" and you have been "given notice".
Nah - carry on!
League City, TX
Yankee born, but got to Texas as fast as I could! NRA / PSC / IANAL
Yankee born, but got to Texas as fast as I could! NRA / PSC / IANAL
Re: Question on sign at local hospital.
Thanks for the info.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 1184
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 10:13 am
- Location: Central TX
- Contact:
Re: Question on sign at local hospital.
So, if the hospital was tired of the 45 MPH speed limit in front of their building and posted a cardboard sign written in crayon with a lower speed limit you would feel compelled to comply? Just asking...........Running Arrow Bill wrote:IMO, whether the sign is "legal" or not, they have made their "intent" and you have been "given notice".
Better to keep your guns away from this place and save possible grief & inconvenience... Much easier and cheaper than defending your self in Court, IMO.
No State shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and charge a fee therefor. -- Murdock v. Pennsylvania
If the State converts a right into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right with impunity. -- Shuttleworth v. City of Birmingham
If the State converts a right into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right with impunity. -- Shuttleworth v. City of Birmingham
Re: Question on sign at local hospital.
I'd walk by that sign ... I do not possess a handgun under Article 4413 (29 ee)
The sign itself states that it does not apply to you.... It's not addressed to you ... unless you possess a handgun under 4413 (29ee) ...which you don't.
No need to read mail not addressed to me ...
SEE: viewtopic.php?f=53&t=34571#p407475" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The sign itself states that it does not apply to you.... It's not addressed to you ... unless you possess a handgun under 4413 (29ee) ...which you don't.
No need to read mail not addressed to me ...
SEE: viewtopic.php?f=53&t=34571#p407475" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Last edited by RPB on Tue Jul 05, 2011 4:08 pm, edited 2 times in total.
I'm no lawyer
"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 11:34 pm
Re: Question on sign at local hospital.
RPB wrote:I'd walk by that sign ... I do not possess a handgun under Article 4413 (29 ee)
The sign itself states that it does not apply to you.... It's not addressed to you ... unless you possess a handgun under 4413 (29ee) ...which you don't.
No need to read mail not addressed to me ...
SEE: viewtopic.php?f=53&t=34571#p407475" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Question on sign at local hospital.
Answer is really simple ... if sign says no girls beyond this point, I ask myself ... am I a girl? .... that sign says no guns possessed under that article are allowed ... I ask am I possessing one under that article ... nope ... a policeman might ask himself the same question and arrive at the same answer too .... the sign is only addressed to persons possessing a handgun under 4413(29ee) ...
I'm no lawyer
"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 794
- Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2011 10:14 am
- Location: Grand Prairie, Texas
Re: Question on sign at local hospital.
The sign follows the "spirit of the law." The hospital does not want guns on their premises.
The sign does not follow the "letter of the law." It is not a properly posted 30.06 sign.
That being said, I would not want to go to court over the semantics. Like an earlier posted indicated, it would not be worth my time and hassel trying to defend myself in court.
The sign does not follow the "letter of the law." It is not a properly posted 30.06 sign.
That being said, I would not want to go to court over the semantics. Like an earlier posted indicated, it would not be worth my time and hassel trying to defend myself in court.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Remember 31 Connollystraße & Benghazi
Faith Under Fire ISBN# 9780307408815
Remember 31 Connollystraße & Benghazi
Faith Under Fire ISBN# 9780307408815
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 3:58 pm
- Location: Wellington, TX
- Contact:
Re: Question on sign at local hospital.
I agree! 100%v-rog wrote:The sign follows the "spirit of the law." The hospital does not want guns on their premises.
The sign does not follow the "letter of the law." It is not a properly posted 30.06 sign.
That being said, I would not want to go to court over the semantics. Like an earlier posted indicated, it would not be worth my time and hassel trying to defend myself in court.
It never ceases to amaze me the individuals (no offense intended) that debate over the "validity" of a no gun sign. From my perspective, if anyone or anything indicates to me that I and my stuff are "not wanted" that's enough for me. I do not want to be put in any position to defend my position over some issue of law. I've got better things to do than deal with a lawyer, court system, etc., $$ costs, etc., over any actual or implied rights of mine. Bottomline...unless I HAVE to go to a place where my gun is not wanted, I'll disarm. If, for some unavoidable reason, I have to deal with the "system", then so be it and I'll deal with it. Otherwise, there are other places that would like to have my business.
JMO...
Running Arrow Farm, LLC
Wellington, TX. 79095
longhorncattle2013@gmail.ocom
Registered Texas Longhorn Cattle
Wellington, TX. 79095
longhorncattle2013@gmail.ocom
Registered Texas Longhorn Cattle
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
- Location: Ellis County
Re: Question on sign at local hospital.
So you would not pass a gun buster sign without disarming?Running Arrow Bill wrote:I agree! 100%v-rog wrote:The sign follows the "spirit of the law." The hospital does not want guns on their premises.
The sign does not follow the "letter of the law." It is not a properly posted 30.06 sign.
That being said, I would not want to go to court over the semantics. Like an earlier posted indicated, it would not be worth my time and hassel trying to defend myself in court.
It never ceases to amaze me the individuals (no offense intended) that debate over the "validity" of a no gun sign. From my perspective, if anyone or anything indicates to me that I and my stuff are "not wanted" that's enough for me. I do not want to be put in any position to defend my position over some issue of law. I've got better things to do than deal with a lawyer, court system, etc., $$ costs, etc., over any actual or implied rights of mine. Bottomline...unless I HAVE to go to a place where my gun is not wanted, I'll disarm. If, for some unavoidable reason, I have to deal with the "system", then so be it and I'll deal with it. Otherwise, there are other places that would like to have my business.
JMO...
Last edited by jmra on Tue Jul 05, 2011 5:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
Re: Question on sign at local hospital.
Sorry, but ours is a government of laws, not of men or their feelings/intent.
Intent has no bearing at all on this. You are either in compliance with laws pertaining to your behavior in this location, or you are not.
it's black and white, you are legal to carry.
Intent has no bearing at all on this. You are either in compliance with laws pertaining to your behavior in this location, or you are not.
it's black and white, you are legal to carry.
-----------
“Sometimes there is no alternative to uncertainty except to await the arrival of more and better data.” C. Wunsch
“Sometimes there is no alternative to uncertainty except to await the arrival of more and better data.” C. Wunsch