Open carry question

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

Charlies.Contingency
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 808
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2014 4:58 pm
Location: South Central Texas

Re: Open carry question

#16

Post by Charlies.Contingency »

casp625 wrote:Oh god, "is-grip-showing-considered-open-carry" is turning into the new "is-iwb-holster-a-belt-holster" :roll:
Is my thigh rig considered a belt holster since it attaches to my belt? :smilelol5: I had to. :mrgreen:
Sent from Iphone: Please IGNORE any grammatical or spelling errors.
ALL of my statements are to be considered opinionated and not factual.

joelamosobadiah
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 243
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 12:03 am

Re: Open carry question

#17

Post by joelamosobadiah »

Charlies.Contingency wrote: I thought it was pretty clear that the holster has nothing to do with it being "open carry." Yes a holster must meet certain requirements to legally open carry with, but as long as the firearm itself, or a portion of it can be seen, then it is considered "open" as it can be seen. If it cannot be seen, it is concealed. If you put on a flap holster like a Calvary Officers holster, and the handgun cannot be seen, it is concealed. Same concept of carrying a rifle in a case. Just because you know it's a rifle case, doesn't make it open carry of a rifle. If the rifle is seen, it is "open."

Did I clarify that any? Please add more to this if needed.
I agree. Also, the retention requirements are non-existent in the Open Carry Law, so that's a moot point. If the handgun is showing, open carry, if it isn't, concealed carry.
User avatar

Charlies.Contingency
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 808
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2014 4:58 pm
Location: South Central Texas

Re: Open carry question

#18

Post by Charlies.Contingency »

joelamosobadiah wrote:
Charlies.Contingency wrote: I thought it was pretty clear that the holster has nothing to do with it being "open carry." Yes a holster must meet certain requirements to legally open carry with, but as long as the firearm itself, or a portion of it can be seen, then it is considered "open" as it can be seen. If it cannot be seen, it is concealed. If you put on a flap holster like a Calvary Officers holster, and the handgun cannot be seen, it is concealed. Same concept of carrying a rifle in a case. Just because you know it's a rifle case, doesn't make it open carry of a rifle. If the rifle is seen, it is "open."

Did I clarify that any? Please add more to this if needed.
I agree. Also, the retention requirements are non-existent in the Open Carry Law, so that's a moot point. If the handgun is showing, open carry, if it isn't, concealed carry.
Did I mention retention? If you mean by my statement in Blue above, then I meant the "belt or shoulder" requirement. ;-)
Sent from Iphone: Please IGNORE any grammatical or spelling errors.
ALL of my statements are to be considered opinionated and not factual.

NotRPB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1351
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 8:24 am

Re: Open carry question

#19

Post by NotRPB »

I bet that "concealed carrying" in this holster
holsterFlap.png
would get a person arrested for "open carrying" even if you couldn't see the pistol or any part of the pistol.

TEX GV. CODE ANN. § 411.171
3) "Concealed handgun" means a handgun,the presence of which is not openly discernible to the ordinary observation of a reasonable person.
So, I think holster shape *may*? matter as a reasonable person seeing that flap holster would certainly discern" maybe not discern !! but at least believe/suspect/guess a gun was present... so ... maybe the term "openly discernible" versus believe/suspect/guess is what I question.

I think you are right, similar to "printing isn't illegal" ... however, this isn't a "bulge" it's obviously a holster, the issue is whether it can be discerned that a "real handgun" is in it

One person could put a paper towel over the grip of the pistol in that flap holster ... true it "could be a toy/replica/antique" pistol ... but the investigating officer would determine it is a "real" handgun

So if the concealed handgun is carried the above openly carried belt holster... I could have been wearing that concealed handgun belt holster since 1995?

perhaps you are correct, it may meet definition of concealed,, but I'm sure it would get called in, and soon after, Police and judge could debate it.

I"m still not sure where that type holster fits in situation where a either a 30.06 or a 30.07 sign exists but not both signs present.

Perhaps it's a concealed handgun carried in an openly carried holster?

Probably would be arrested for concealed carrying if there's a 30.06 sign and no 30.07 sign ... probably get arrested for open carry if there's a 30.07 sign and no 30.06 sign.

too costly to find out with Court fees
User avatar

Glockster
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1075
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 7:48 am
Location: Kingwood, TX

Re: Open carry question

#20

Post by Glockster »

NotRPB wrote:One person could put a paper towel over the grip of the pistol in that flap holster ... true it "could be a toy/replica/antique" pistol ... but the investigating officer would determine it is a "real" handgun.
To me that is not really that different from wearing a Sneaky Pete. I don't know that what may be a holster has inside of it. I have personally seen a holster like what you have pictured used to carry a cellphone. This has been discussed here many times, like with someone wearing a fanny pack, or a tactical carrying case, or a Sneaky Pete. I agree that someone investigating could determine that it really did hold a handgun, but that's a conclusion reached only by an officer asking you what is in there, not necessarily by walking up to you and saying that it appears you have hidden a handgun there in the whatever it is. It seems to me that if they have to investigate, and ask, then it clearly wasn't "openly discernible" after all.
NRA Life Member
My State Rep Hubert won't tell me his position on HB560. How about yours?

NotRPB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1351
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 8:24 am

Re: Open carry question

#21

Post by NotRPB »

Open carry of rifles isn't illegal, nor is concealed carry in a guitar/violin case

Good point
Sneaky Pete
and Wilderness Safepacker are similar square not commonly associated as holster shapes necessarily containing guns and = concealed (Thanks for that, I hadn't heard of Sneaky Pete holsters, now I need one, well, several lol)

Cavalry Officers holster with flap, anyone who ever saw a movie, instantly would think "gun" not sure they could "discern" "gun" I never saw anyone ever using it, that shape holster for EMT tools, computer repair tools, medical devices, pagers, tablets, cell phones, hammers etc
holsterFlap.png
If that IS a concealed carry holster, ...perhaps if worn where concealed handguns allowed and where open carry prohibited? ... I still wouldn't risk it. I like that type holster, but not worth the potential cost in that particular situation
User avatar

Glockster
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1075
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 7:48 am
Location: Kingwood, TX

Re: Open carry question

#22

Post by Glockster »

NotRPB wrote:Open carry of rifles isn't illegal, nor is concealed carry in a guitar/violin case

Good point
Sneaky Pete
and Wilderness Safepacker are similar square not commonly associated as holster shapes necessarily containing guns and = concealed (Thanks for that, I hadn't heard of Sneaky Pete holsters, now I need one, well, several lol)

Cavalry Officers holster with flap, anyone who ever saw a movie, instantly would think "gun" not sure they could "discern" "gun" I never saw anyone ever using it, that shape holster for EMT tools, computer repair tools, medical devices, pagers, tablets, cell phones, hammers etc
holsterFlap.png
If that IS a concealed carry holster, ...perhaps if worn where concealed handguns allowed and where open carry prohibited? ... I still wouldn't risk it. I like that type holster, but not worth the potential cost in that particular situation
I do like Sneaky Pete and have one for my Kimber and one of my H&K. Nobody has given it a second look.

The guy I saw carrying his cell phone in it did so because it was his grandfather's holster, and he supposedly wore it as a TX Ranger.

Another example of a concealed but you don't know for sure is a Maxpedition CC Pouch. I wear it when I'm out on the trails as it matches my other gear, keeps it handy in a way that another holster would be a problem. If you have one on I would recognize it and might wonder if you were using it for that. But remove the velcro inside handgun holder, you could be carrying poptarts in there for all I know. :tiphat:
NRA Life Member
My State Rep Hubert won't tell me his position on HB560. How about yours?

joelamosobadiah
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 243
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 12:03 am

Re: Open carry question

#23

Post by joelamosobadiah »

Charlies.Contingency wrote:
joelamosobadiah wrote:
Charlies.Contingency wrote: I thought it was pretty clear that the holster has nothing to do with it being "open carry." Yes a holster must meet certain requirements to legally open carry with, but as long as the firearm itself, or a portion of it can be seen, then it is considered "open" as it can be seen. If it cannot be seen, it is concealed. If you put on a flap holster like a Calvary Officers holster, and the handgun cannot be seen, it is concealed. Same concept of carrying a rifle in a case. Just because you know it's a rifle case, doesn't make it open carry of a rifle. If the rifle is seen, it is "open."

Did I clarify that any? Please add more to this if needed.
I agree. Also, the retention requirements are non-existent in the Open Carry Law, so that's a moot point. If the handgun is showing, open carry, if it isn't, concealed carry.
Did I mention retention? If you mean by my statement in Blue above, then I meant the "belt or shoulder" requirement. ;-)
I apologize, I clipped the quote to make the post not be huge and accidentally removed the entire other quote. The retention comment was not in regards to your post. :thumbs2:
User avatar

SA_Steve
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 357
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2014 9:59 pm
Location: San Antonio, north central hills

Re: Open carry question

#24

Post by SA_Steve »

A couple changes to the law will get us in sync with Georgia's weapon carry license regulations:
1 - carry any way you want (except in the hand), holsters not mentioned
2- carry most any weapon, not just firearm
You may have the last word.

Topic author
cmgee67
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 1914
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 2:45 pm

Re: Open carry question

#25

Post by cmgee67 »

You cleared it up very well thank you!
User avatar

der Teufel
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 504
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 12:31 pm
Location: In the vicinity of Austin

Re: Open carry question

#26

Post by der Teufel »

Glockster wrote:
NotRPB wrote:One person could put a paper towel over the grip of the pistol in that flap holster ... true it "could be a toy/replica/antique" pistol ... but the investigating officer would determine it is a "real" handgun.
To me that is not really that different from wearing a Sneaky Pete. I don't know that what may be a holster has inside of it. I have personally seen a holster like what you have pictured used to carry a cellphone. This has been discussed here many times, like with someone wearing a fanny pack, or a tactical carrying case, or a Sneaky Pete. I agree that someone investigating could determine that it really did hold a handgun, but that's a conclusion reached only by an officer asking you what is in there, not necessarily by walking up to you and saying that it appears you have hidden a handgun there in the whatever it is. It seems to me that if they have to investigate, and ask, then it clearly wasn't "openly discernible" after all.

When I was in school, a teacher posed a question: If we replaced the roll-up window shades with blanket material, would you still call them window shades, or would you call them blankets? We discussed this for several minutes, and there were differing opinions, until the teacher asked "What would a stranger who walked in say?" We all agreed the first question would be "What are those blankets doing on the windows?"

I think anyone who sees a gun holster would assume there was a gun inside. They may be wrong, but that would be their first and probably only assumption. I also believe a jury would conclude that you weren't concealing a firearm by carrying it in an openly visible holster.

YMMV
--
A man can never have too much red wine, too many books, or too much ammunition. — Rudyard Kipling
NRA Endowment Member
TSRA Life Member
User avatar

Glockster
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1075
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 7:48 am
Location: Kingwood, TX

Re: Open carry question

#27

Post by Glockster »

der Teufel wrote:
Glockster wrote:
NotRPB wrote:One person could put a paper towel over the grip of the pistol in that flap holster ... true it "could be a toy/replica/antique" pistol ... but the investigating officer would determine it is a "real" handgun.
To me that is not really that different from wearing a Sneaky Pete. I don't know that what may be a holster has inside of it. I have personally seen a holster like what you have pictured used to carry a cellphone. This has been discussed here many times, like with someone wearing a fanny pack, or a tactical carrying case, or a Sneaky Pete. I agree that someone investigating could determine that it really did hold a handgun, but that's a conclusion reached only by an officer asking you what is in there, not necessarily by walking up to you and saying that it appears you have hidden a handgun there in the whatever it is. It seems to me that if they have to investigate, and ask, then it clearly wasn't "openly discernible" after all.

When I was in school, a teacher posed a question: If we replaced the roll-up window shades with blanket material, would you still call them window shades, or would you call them blankets? We discussed this for several minutes, and there were differing opinions, until the teacher asked "What would a stranger who walked in say?" We all agreed the first question would be "What are those blankets doing on the windows?"

I think anyone who sees a gun holster would assume there was a gun inside. They may be wrong, but that would be their first and probably only assumption. I also believe a jury would conclude that you weren't concealing a firearm by carrying it in an openly visible holster.

YMMV
--
That would make sense except that for example, a Sneaky Pete doesn't look like a holster. It's a completely closed leather box that could hold lots of things.
NRA Life Member
My State Rep Hubert won't tell me his position on HB560. How about yours?

casp625
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 671
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2015 9:24 pm

Re: Open carry question

#28

Post by casp625 »

Glockster wrote:
der Teufel wrote:
Glockster wrote:
NotRPB wrote:One person could put a paper towel over the grip of the pistol in that flap holster ... true it "could be a toy/replica/antique" pistol ... but the investigating officer would determine it is a "real" handgun.
To me that is not really that different from wearing a Sneaky Pete. I don't know that what may be a holster has inside of it. I have personally seen a holster like what you have pictured used to carry a cellphone. This has been discussed here many times, like with someone wearing a fanny pack, or a tactical carrying case, or a Sneaky Pete. I agree that someone investigating could determine that it really did hold a handgun, but that's a conclusion reached only by an officer asking you what is in there, not necessarily by walking up to you and saying that it appears you have hidden a handgun there in the whatever it is. It seems to me that if they have to investigate, and ask, then it clearly wasn't "openly discernible" after all.

When I was in school, a teacher posed a question: If we replaced the roll-up window shades with blanket material, would you still call them window shades, or would you call them blankets? We discussed this for several minutes, and there were differing opinions, until the teacher asked "What would a stranger who walked in say?" We all agreed the first question would be "What are those blankets doing on the windows?"

I think anyone who sees a gun holster would assume there was a gun inside. They may be wrong, but that would be their first and probably only assumption. I also believe a jury would conclude that you weren't concealing a firearm by carrying it in an openly visible holster.

YMMV
--
That would make sense except that for example, a Sneaky Pete doesn't look like a holster. It's a completely closed leather box that could hold lots of things.
I looked up Sneaky Pete holsters and came to the conclusion that there is no way to tell what it is used for. Thus, I would have to say, even if you had the holster openly visible, you would still be concealed carrying. Looks like a big cell phone holster or other tool! Maybe you are an electrician and have tools for that in there.

glazer1972
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 70
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 9:31 pm
Location: East TX

Re: Open carry question

#29

Post by glazer1972 »

Visible=open
Not visible=concealed

Mark G26
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 309
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 11:30 pm
Location: Dallas

Re: Open carry question

#30

Post by Mark G26 »

Would a CQC Serpa paddle holster be considered a belt holster for OC if not wearing a belt?
NRA Member
TSRA Member

Guns only have two enemies; rust and politicians
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”