Is my thigh rig considered a belt holster since it attaches to my belt? I had to.casp625 wrote:Oh god, "is-grip-showing-considered-open-carry" is turning into the new "is-iwb-holster-a-belt-holster"
Open carry question
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 808
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2014 4:58 pm
- Location: South Central Texas
Re: Open carry question
Sent from Iphone: Please IGNORE any grammatical or spelling errors.
ALL of my statements are to be considered opinionated and not factual.
ALL of my statements are to be considered opinionated and not factual.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 12:03 am
Re: Open carry question
I agree. Also, the retention requirements are non-existent in the Open Carry Law, so that's a moot point. If the handgun is showing, open carry, if it isn't, concealed carry.Charlies.Contingency wrote: I thought it was pretty clear that the holster has nothing to do with it being "open carry." Yes a holster must meet certain requirements to legally open carry with, but as long as the firearm itself, or a portion of it can be seen, then it is considered "open" as it can be seen. If it cannot be seen, it is concealed. If you put on a flap holster like a Calvary Officers holster, and the handgun cannot be seen, it is concealed. Same concept of carrying a rifle in a case. Just because you know it's a rifle case, doesn't make it open carry of a rifle. If the rifle is seen, it is "open."
Did I clarify that any? Please add more to this if needed.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 808
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2014 4:58 pm
- Location: South Central Texas
Re: Open carry question
Did I mention retention? If you mean by my statement in Blue above, then I meant the "belt or shoulder" requirement.joelamosobadiah wrote:I agree. Also, the retention requirements are non-existent in the Open Carry Law, so that's a moot point. If the handgun is showing, open carry, if it isn't, concealed carry.Charlies.Contingency wrote: I thought it was pretty clear that the holster has nothing to do with it being "open carry." Yes a holster must meet certain requirements to legally open carry with, but as long as the firearm itself, or a portion of it can be seen, then it is considered "open" as it can be seen. If it cannot be seen, it is concealed. If you put on a flap holster like a Calvary Officers holster, and the handgun cannot be seen, it is concealed. Same concept of carrying a rifle in a case. Just because you know it's a rifle case, doesn't make it open carry of a rifle. If the rifle is seen, it is "open."
Did I clarify that any? Please add more to this if needed.
Sent from Iphone: Please IGNORE any grammatical or spelling errors.
ALL of my statements are to be considered opinionated and not factual.
ALL of my statements are to be considered opinionated and not factual.
Re: Open carry question
I bet that "concealed carrying" in this holster
TEX GV. CODE ANN. § 411.171
3) "Concealed handgun" means a handgun,the presence of which is not openly discernible to the ordinary observation of a reasonable person.
So, I think holster shape *may*? matter as a reasonable person seeing that flap holster would certainly discern" maybe not discern !! but at least believe/suspect/guess a gun was present... so ... maybe the term "openly discernible" versus believe/suspect/guess is what I question.
I think you are right, similar to "printing isn't illegal" ... however, this isn't a "bulge" it's obviously a holster, the issue is whether it can be discerned that a "real handgun" is in it
One person could put a paper towel over the grip of the pistol in that flap holster ... true it "could be a toy/replica/antique" pistol ... but the investigating officer would determine it is a "real" handgun
So if the concealed handgun is carried the above openly carried belt holster... I could have been wearing that concealed handgun belt holster since 1995?
perhaps you are correct, it may meet definition of concealed,, but I'm sure it would get called in, and soon after, Police and judge could debate it.
I"m still not sure where that type holster fits in situation where a either a 30.06 or a 30.07 sign exists but not both signs present.
Perhaps it's a concealed handgun carried in an openly carried holster?
Probably would be arrested for concealed carrying if there's a 30.06 sign and no 30.07 sign ... probably get arrested for open carry if there's a 30.07 sign and no 30.06 sign.
too costly to find out with Court fees
would get a person arrested for "open carrying" even if you couldn't see the pistol or any part of the pistol. TEX GV. CODE ANN. § 411.171
3) "Concealed handgun" means a handgun,the presence of which is not openly discernible to the ordinary observation of a reasonable person.
So, I think holster shape *may*? matter as a reasonable person seeing that flap holster would certainly discern" maybe not discern !! but at least believe/suspect/guess a gun was present... so ... maybe the term "openly discernible" versus believe/suspect/guess is what I question.
I think you are right, similar to "printing isn't illegal" ... however, this isn't a "bulge" it's obviously a holster, the issue is whether it can be discerned that a "real handgun" is in it
One person could put a paper towel over the grip of the pistol in that flap holster ... true it "could be a toy/replica/antique" pistol ... but the investigating officer would determine it is a "real" handgun
So if the concealed handgun is carried the above openly carried belt holster... I could have been wearing that concealed handgun belt holster since 1995?
perhaps you are correct, it may meet definition of concealed,, but I'm sure it would get called in, and soon after, Police and judge could debate it.
I"m still not sure where that type holster fits in situation where a either a 30.06 or a 30.07 sign exists but not both signs present.
Perhaps it's a concealed handgun carried in an openly carried holster?
Probably would be arrested for concealed carrying if there's a 30.06 sign and no 30.07 sign ... probably get arrested for open carry if there's a 30.07 sign and no 30.06 sign.
too costly to find out with Court fees
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 1075
- Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 7:48 am
- Location: Kingwood, TX
Re: Open carry question
To me that is not really that different from wearing a Sneaky Pete. I don't know that what may be a holster has inside of it. I have personally seen a holster like what you have pictured used to carry a cellphone. This has been discussed here many times, like with someone wearing a fanny pack, or a tactical carrying case, or a Sneaky Pete. I agree that someone investigating could determine that it really did hold a handgun, but that's a conclusion reached only by an officer asking you what is in there, not necessarily by walking up to you and saying that it appears you have hidden a handgun there in the whatever it is. It seems to me that if they have to investigate, and ask, then it clearly wasn't "openly discernible" after all.NotRPB wrote:One person could put a paper towel over the grip of the pistol in that flap holster ... true it "could be a toy/replica/antique" pistol ... but the investigating officer would determine it is a "real" handgun.
NRA Life Member
My State Rep Hubert won't tell me his position on HB560. How about yours?
My State Rep Hubert won't tell me his position on HB560. How about yours?
Re: Open carry question
Open carry of rifles isn't illegal, nor is concealed carry in a guitar/violin case
Good point
Sneaky Pete and Wilderness Safepacker are similar square not commonly associated as holster shapes necessarily containing guns and = concealed (Thanks for that, I hadn't heard of Sneaky Pete holsters, now I need one, well, several lol)
Cavalry Officers holster with flap, anyone who ever saw a movie, instantly would think "gun" not sure they could "discern" "gun" I never saw anyone ever using it, that shape holster for EMT tools, computer repair tools, medical devices, pagers, tablets, cell phones, hammers etc If that IS a concealed carry holster, ...perhaps if worn where concealed handguns allowed and where open carry prohibited? ... I still wouldn't risk it. I like that type holster, but not worth the potential cost in that particular situation
Good point
Sneaky Pete and Wilderness Safepacker are similar square not commonly associated as holster shapes necessarily containing guns and = concealed (Thanks for that, I hadn't heard of Sneaky Pete holsters, now I need one, well, several lol)
Cavalry Officers holster with flap, anyone who ever saw a movie, instantly would think "gun" not sure they could "discern" "gun" I never saw anyone ever using it, that shape holster for EMT tools, computer repair tools, medical devices, pagers, tablets, cell phones, hammers etc If that IS a concealed carry holster, ...perhaps if worn where concealed handguns allowed and where open carry prohibited? ... I still wouldn't risk it. I like that type holster, but not worth the potential cost in that particular situation
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 1075
- Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 7:48 am
- Location: Kingwood, TX
Re: Open carry question
I do like Sneaky Pete and have one for my Kimber and one of my H&K. Nobody has given it a second look.NotRPB wrote:Open carry of rifles isn't illegal, nor is concealed carry in a guitar/violin case
Good point
Sneaky Pete and Wilderness Safepacker are similar square not commonly associated as holster shapes necessarily containing guns and = concealed (Thanks for that, I hadn't heard of Sneaky Pete holsters, now I need one, well, several lol)
Cavalry Officers holster with flap, anyone who ever saw a movie, instantly would think "gun" not sure they could "discern" "gun" I never saw anyone ever using it, that shape holster for EMT tools, computer repair tools, medical devices, pagers, tablets, cell phones, hammers etc If that IS a concealed carry holster, ...perhaps if worn where concealed handguns allowed and where open carry prohibited? ... I still wouldn't risk it. I like that type holster, but not worth the potential cost in that particular situation
The guy I saw carrying his cell phone in it did so because it was his grandfather's holster, and he supposedly wore it as a TX Ranger.
Another example of a concealed but you don't know for sure is a Maxpedition CC Pouch. I wear it when I'm out on the trails as it matches my other gear, keeps it handy in a way that another holster would be a problem. If you have one on I would recognize it and might wonder if you were using it for that. But remove the velcro inside handgun holder, you could be carrying poptarts in there for all I know.
NRA Life Member
My State Rep Hubert won't tell me his position on HB560. How about yours?
My State Rep Hubert won't tell me his position on HB560. How about yours?
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 12:03 am
Re: Open carry question
I apologize, I clipped the quote to make the post not be huge and accidentally removed the entire other quote. The retention comment was not in regards to your post.Charlies.Contingency wrote:Did I mention retention? If you mean by my statement in Blue above, then I meant the "belt or shoulder" requirement.joelamosobadiah wrote:I agree. Also, the retention requirements are non-existent in the Open Carry Law, so that's a moot point. If the handgun is showing, open carry, if it isn't, concealed carry.Charlies.Contingency wrote: I thought it was pretty clear that the holster has nothing to do with it being "open carry." Yes a holster must meet certain requirements to legally open carry with, but as long as the firearm itself, or a portion of it can be seen, then it is considered "open" as it can be seen. If it cannot be seen, it is concealed. If you put on a flap holster like a Calvary Officers holster, and the handgun cannot be seen, it is concealed. Same concept of carrying a rifle in a case. Just because you know it's a rifle case, doesn't make it open carry of a rifle. If the rifle is seen, it is "open."
Did I clarify that any? Please add more to this if needed.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 357
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2014 9:59 pm
- Location: San Antonio, north central hills
Re: Open carry question
A couple changes to the law will get us in sync with Georgia's weapon carry license regulations:
1 - carry any way you want (except in the hand), holsters not mentioned
2- carry most any weapon, not just firearm
1 - carry any way you want (except in the hand), holsters not mentioned
2- carry most any weapon, not just firearm
You may have the last word.
Re: Open carry question
You cleared it up very well thank you!
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 504
- Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 12:31 pm
- Location: In the vicinity of Austin
Re: Open carry question
Glockster wrote:To me that is not really that different from wearing a Sneaky Pete. I don't know that what may be a holster has inside of it. I have personally seen a holster like what you have pictured used to carry a cellphone. This has been discussed here many times, like with someone wearing a fanny pack, or a tactical carrying case, or a Sneaky Pete. I agree that someone investigating could determine that it really did hold a handgun, but that's a conclusion reached only by an officer asking you what is in there, not necessarily by walking up to you and saying that it appears you have hidden a handgun there in the whatever it is. It seems to me that if they have to investigate, and ask, then it clearly wasn't "openly discernible" after all.NotRPB wrote:One person could put a paper towel over the grip of the pistol in that flap holster ... true it "could be a toy/replica/antique" pistol ... but the investigating officer would determine it is a "real" handgun.
When I was in school, a teacher posed a question: If we replaced the roll-up window shades with blanket material, would you still call them window shades, or would you call them blankets? We discussed this for several minutes, and there were differing opinions, until the teacher asked "What would a stranger who walked in say?" We all agreed the first question would be "What are those blankets doing on the windows?"
I think anyone who sees a gun holster would assume there was a gun inside. They may be wrong, but that would be their first and probably only assumption. I also believe a jury would conclude that you weren't concealing a firearm by carrying it in an openly visible holster.
YMMV
--
A man can never have too much red wine, too many books, or too much ammunition. — Rudyard Kipling
NRA Endowment Member
TSRA Life Member
NRA Endowment Member
TSRA Life Member
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 1075
- Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 7:48 am
- Location: Kingwood, TX
Re: Open carry question
That would make sense except that for example, a Sneaky Pete doesn't look like a holster. It's a completely closed leather box that could hold lots of things.der Teufel wrote:Glockster wrote:To me that is not really that different from wearing a Sneaky Pete. I don't know that what may be a holster has inside of it. I have personally seen a holster like what you have pictured used to carry a cellphone. This has been discussed here many times, like with someone wearing a fanny pack, or a tactical carrying case, or a Sneaky Pete. I agree that someone investigating could determine that it really did hold a handgun, but that's a conclusion reached only by an officer asking you what is in there, not necessarily by walking up to you and saying that it appears you have hidden a handgun there in the whatever it is. It seems to me that if they have to investigate, and ask, then it clearly wasn't "openly discernible" after all.NotRPB wrote:One person could put a paper towel over the grip of the pistol in that flap holster ... true it "could be a toy/replica/antique" pistol ... but the investigating officer would determine it is a "real" handgun.
When I was in school, a teacher posed a question: If we replaced the roll-up window shades with blanket material, would you still call them window shades, or would you call them blankets? We discussed this for several minutes, and there were differing opinions, until the teacher asked "What would a stranger who walked in say?" We all agreed the first question would be "What are those blankets doing on the windows?"
I think anyone who sees a gun holster would assume there was a gun inside. They may be wrong, but that would be their first and probably only assumption. I also believe a jury would conclude that you weren't concealing a firearm by carrying it in an openly visible holster.
YMMV
--
NRA Life Member
My State Rep Hubert won't tell me his position on HB560. How about yours?
My State Rep Hubert won't tell me his position on HB560. How about yours?
Re: Open carry question
I looked up Sneaky Pete holsters and came to the conclusion that there is no way to tell what it is used for. Thus, I would have to say, even if you had the holster openly visible, you would still be concealed carrying. Looks like a big cell phone holster or other tool! Maybe you are an electrician and have tools for that in there.Glockster wrote:That would make sense except that for example, a Sneaky Pete doesn't look like a holster. It's a completely closed leather box that could hold lots of things.der Teufel wrote:Glockster wrote:To me that is not really that different from wearing a Sneaky Pete. I don't know that what may be a holster has inside of it. I have personally seen a holster like what you have pictured used to carry a cellphone. This has been discussed here many times, like with someone wearing a fanny pack, or a tactical carrying case, or a Sneaky Pete. I agree that someone investigating could determine that it really did hold a handgun, but that's a conclusion reached only by an officer asking you what is in there, not necessarily by walking up to you and saying that it appears you have hidden a handgun there in the whatever it is. It seems to me that if they have to investigate, and ask, then it clearly wasn't "openly discernible" after all.NotRPB wrote:One person could put a paper towel over the grip of the pistol in that flap holster ... true it "could be a toy/replica/antique" pistol ... but the investigating officer would determine it is a "real" handgun.
When I was in school, a teacher posed a question: If we replaced the roll-up window shades with blanket material, would you still call them window shades, or would you call them blankets? We discussed this for several minutes, and there were differing opinions, until the teacher asked "What would a stranger who walked in say?" We all agreed the first question would be "What are those blankets doing on the windows?"
I think anyone who sees a gun holster would assume there was a gun inside. They may be wrong, but that would be their first and probably only assumption. I also believe a jury would conclude that you weren't concealing a firearm by carrying it in an openly visible holster.
YMMV
--
-
- Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 9:31 pm
- Location: East TX
Re: Open carry question
Visible=open
Not visible=concealed
Not visible=concealed
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 11:30 pm
- Location: Dallas
Re: Open carry question
Would a CQC Serpa paddle holster be considered a belt holster for OC if not wearing a belt?
NRA Member
TSRA Member
Guns only have two enemies; rust and politicians
TSRA Member
Guns only have two enemies; rust and politicians