It is what it is but 801 is significantly less than 1993, and paints a truer picture of the immediate effects of OC in new 06 signage. Good work!Russell wrote:LSUTiger wrote: The real question is, how many new 06 signs went up? Compared to the normal rate of new 06 sign going up prior to debate/passage of OC (2014)? I bet a large part of that 1993 number is 07 signs only. Once you have a more detailed breakdown, you can make a better analysis.
I'm sure it's much higher than the normal rate of new 06 signs but I would bet its significantly less that 1993.
Good point! Here's data on new entries that are only 30.06 or both 30.06 and 30.07. I'm only going to do the months of October up to January as I am manually typing SQL queries for these and don't feel like typing that much to do every single month
Note that this is also grabbing entries that were originally submitted during the stated time frame and may not have met the search criteria (they were 30.07 only), but are now a 30.06 or both 30.06 & 30.07 sign as of today.
October: 19 new entries
November: 14 new entries
December: 68 new entries
January: 801 new entries
This is still a significant increase in the typical 30.06 signage entry rate.
Now, as they say, when will the bleeding stop? (new 06 signage slow to "normal" pre-OC levels). And it will eventually, I just hope it's before the patient dies!