LOL... Tats have not been considered rebellious in your lifetime. At 31 you were born into tats being a cosmopolitan cool statement. When I read your post about tats being rebellious, I thought you might be like 55 or 60.Odinvalknir wrote: ↑Fri Sep 21, 2018 6:52 pmThat is probably true. I had visible tattoos during the time when it was still kind of looked upon as being a rebellious thing and kind of look down on by a lot of people. But was lucky enough to work in a industry that didn't care. Same thing with beards I've had some sort of long facial hair since I was 18 or 19 going on 31 now. So I'm sure the way people view me is not as shady as I might think nowadays.
Truth of it is though, I bet most people "judge a book by it's cover" but then they suppress it out of political correctness guilt. That is about the same time they become a victim.