Perhaps my Googlefu is lacking these days
But is anybody ever seen a lawsuit against the US government somewhat like the post office one currently but US military location specifically.
No longer a military member retired and a civilian yet my Second Amendment rights are denied me when I have to go on post
Would this not be something capable of being decided in court?
Or perhaps if it ever comes to fruition a successful locket suit against the post office would do the same for military post S
Related but different to the post office lawsuit
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 2781
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 11:48 pm
- Location: Kempner
- Contact:
Related but different to the post office lawsuit
Companion animal Microchips, quality name brand chips, lifetime registration, Low cost just $10~12, not for profit, most locations we can come to you. We cover eight counties McLennan, Hill, Bell, Coryell, Falls, Bosque, Limestone, Lampasas
Contact we.chip.pets@gmail.com
Contact we.chip.pets@gmail.com
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1534
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:41 pm
- Location: Central Texas
Re: Related but different to the post office lawsuit
I have wondered if the Bill of Rights are rules for the government to follow, how can the government violate the Bill of Rights on government property? My way of thinking is that you should be able to carry on all federal property. If the property is of vital national security and the government thinks you need to be disarmed, then maybe there should be armed agents.
In certain extreme situations, the law is inadequate. In order to shame its inadequacy, it is necessary to act outside the law to pursue a natural justice.
Re: Related but different to the post office lawsuit
There's nobody more uptight about controlling access to firearms and ammo than base/post commanders.jason812 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 01, 2019 12:48 pm I have wondered if the Bill of Rights are rules for the government to follow, how can the government violate the Bill of Rights on government property? My way of thinking is that you should be able to carry on all federal property. If the property is of vital national security and the government thinks you need to be disarmed, then maybe there should be armed agents.
NRA Life Member NRA Certified Instructor RSO, CRSO,
USCCA Certified Instructor
TX LTC licensed Instructor Personal/Family Protection and Self Defense Instructor.
Without The First and Second Amendments the rest are meaningless.
USCCA Certified Instructor
TX LTC licensed Instructor Personal/Family Protection and Self Defense Instructor.
Without The First and Second Amendments the rest are meaningless.