Not too bad.Pawpaw wrote:They're only $849.00 a pair.SewTexas wrote:dang....I want those shoes!!!
But isn't there some 'fashion' rule that states she'd also need a matching purse?
That's what my wife says. ??????
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Not too bad.Pawpaw wrote:They're only $849.00 a pair.SewTexas wrote:dang....I want those shoes!!!
flintknapper wrote:Not too bad.Pawpaw wrote:They're only $849.00 a pair.SewTexas wrote:dang....I want those shoes!!!
But isn't there some 'fashion' rule that states she'd also need a matching purse?
That's what my wife says. ??????
SewTexas wrote:flintknapper wrote:Not too bad.Pawpaw wrote:They're only $849.00 a pair.SewTexas wrote:dang....I want those shoes!!!
But isn't there some 'fashion' rule that states she'd also need a matching purse?
That's what my wife says. ??????
I don't know....sort of seems like if you can afford $850 for a pair of shoes, you can probably afford a matching purse.
You wore clothing made of polyester? Not issued uniform blend, but an honest to gosh "lounge lizard" suit? Was it blue? Did you have a shiny shirt to complement it?WildBill wrote:Abraham - Not everything has to make sense. Especially when it relates to [women's] fashion.Abraham wrote:I would guess that's because she's got all that weight bearing down on her tootsies they naturally going to slip off the edge...
High heels make about as much sense as binding babies feet so later they'll be able to totter instead of walking.
High Heels = Tottering...
I'll bet that, back in the day, your wife even bought you a leisure suit.
I know that mine did, and I hated it.
I think Miss Lambert's shoes and her tooties are cute.
I like the way you thinkJusme wrote:SewTexas wrote:flintknapper wrote:Not too bad.Pawpaw wrote:They're only $849.00 a pair.SewTexas wrote:dang....I want those shoes!!!
But isn't there some 'fashion' rule that states she'd also need a matching purse?
That's what my wife says. ??????
I don't know....sort of seems like if you can afford $850 for a pair of shoes, you can probably afford a matching purse.
Or hire someone to carry a purse for you.
Mine was puke green.Dadtodabone wrote:You wore clothing made of polyester? Not issued uniform blend, but an honest to gosh "lounge lizard" suit? Was it blue? Did you have a shiny shirt to complement it?WildBill wrote:Abraham - Not everything has to make sense. Especially when it relates to [women's] fashion.Abraham wrote:I would guess that's because she's got all that weight bearing down on her tootsies they naturally going to slip off the edge...
High heels make about as much sense as binding babies feet so later they'll be able to totter instead of walking.
High Heels = Tottering...
I'll bet that, back in the day, your wife even bought you a leisure suit.
I know that mine did, and I hated it.
I think Miss Lambert's shoes and her tooties are cute.
Ha ha ha !
me too.......
That's for sureVoiceofReason wrote:It’s pathetic seeing the liberals having a psychotic break over a toy gun.
http://www.today.com/style/miranda-lamb ... cms-t84301
I wonder if she would have gotten the same reaction if it had been a necklace or bracelet.The talented artist made several statements — from the bright turquoise pendant and plunging neckline to the new man around her arm — but none were quite as bold as her hot-pink Joyce Echols stilettos.