ninjabread wrote:"Ok, dude. You just made my block list"
At this rate it might be a block chain soon.
OldCannon wrote:PUCKER wrote:Alright - I'm late to the party....cliff notes?
(snipped for length)
I think that summarizes it.
The Annoyed Man wrote:It seems to me that this thread has run its course. The naysayers - who neither understood the spirit in which the thread was first posted, nor did they understand the nature of the topic being discussed - aren’t going to allow the people who are <em>already</em> invested and interested to have a friendly discussion about it without ridiculing them, or as happened to me, impugning their character and motives with a scurrilous and vile accusation. I suppose that debby-downers are necessary to all ecosystems, but at this point, I think a moderator ought to lock the thread. This is my last post in it. I hope that those who wrecked it for the rest of us with their negativity and ridicule don’t object when I return the favor in their own threads down the road, as such an objection might constitute a level of hypocrisy that would definitely need to be pointed out in those threads. Maybe then they might lose some of their social tone-deafness and rediscover a respect for the dignity of others.
So with that, I’m going to contact the moderator for this forum and ask that the thread be locked.
Not my point at all.
The thing of value, I had hoped to add, is a bit of levity
Abraham wrote:...and perhaps that we're all taking this subject a bit to seriously.
Abraham wrote:Crypto-Currency and it's equal isn't a cure for cancer, but it's discussion does seem to cause anger...if said discussion isn't rah-rah-sis-boom-bah...
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests