Secret audio recording of Texas House Speaker released

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply

Topic author
NotRPB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1182
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 8:24 am

Secret audio recording of Texas House Speaker released

#1

Post by NotRPB » Tue Oct 15, 2019 6:22 pm

Secret audio recording of Texas House Speaker released
https://www.wfaa.com/article/news/polit ... a24c68b865
News of the recording led to a House committee requesting the Texas Rangers investigate whether Bonnen's offer of press credentials in exchange for Empower Texans targeting the GOP members could be considered an illegal quid pro quo.
Bonnen offered to grant Empower Texans press credentials giving the conservative organization access the floor of the Texas House if Sullivan, in turn, would campaign against those targeted GOP members in the 2020 primary.

"Let me tell you what I'll do for you," Bonnen said.

"We can make this work. I'll put your guys on the floor next session."


Beckley, who was mentioned seven times in the recording, said Tuesday the name-calling mattered less than what she believes are clear ethics violations.

"I think he needs to step down and we need a bipartisan vote on who should be the speaker right now," she said.

When asked if Bonnen should resign from elected office, Beckley said that is up to voters to decide.
read the entire article at: https://www.wfaa.com/article/news/polit ... a24c68b865

User avatar

narcissist
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 476
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2019 10:09 am

Re: Secret audio recording of Texas House Speaker released

#2

Post by narcissist » Tue Oct 15, 2019 11:05 pm

Secret recordings I thought were not valid in Law/Court? Please correct me if im wrong, maybe explain how to go about it legally ect.
One of my biggest mistakes in life...Is Believing people will show me the same love I've shown them. :reddevil

User avatar

G.A. Heath
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2840
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 9:39 pm
Location: Western Texas

Re: Secret audio recording of Texas House Speaker released

#3

Post by G.A. Heath » Wed Oct 16, 2019 5:18 am

narcissist wrote:
Tue Oct 15, 2019 11:05 pm
Secret recordings I thought were not valid in Law/Court? Please correct me if im wrong, maybe explain how to go about it legally ect.
Depends on a number of factors if I am not mistaken. Under Texas law as long as one party of a conversation is aware of the recording then it is legal, and if it was made legally then the regular rules of evidence come into play.
How do you explain a dog named Sauer without first telling the story of a Puppy named Sig?
R.I.P. Sig, 08/21/2019 - 11/18/2019

User avatar

warnmar10
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 612
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 11:57 am

Re: Secret audio recording of Texas House Speaker released

#4

Post by warnmar10 » Wed Oct 16, 2019 7:45 am

narcissist wrote:
Tue Oct 15, 2019 11:05 pm
Secret recordings I thought were not valid in Law/Court? Please correct me if im wrong, maybe explain how to go about it legally ect.
What difference does it make whether the recordings are admissible in court or not?
Image

User avatar

anygunanywhere
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 7496
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
Location: La Grange, Texas

Re: Secret audio recording of Texas House Speaker released

#5

Post by anygunanywhere » Wed Oct 16, 2019 7:46 am

narcissist wrote:
Tue Oct 15, 2019 11:05 pm
Secret recordings I thought were not valid in Law/Court? Please correct me if im wrong, maybe explain how to go about it legally ect.
What matters most is the court of voter opinion.
"The Second Amendment is absolute...If we refuse infringement to our Right to Keep and Bear Arms, as protected by the Second Amendment, we will never be burdened by tyranny, dictatorship, or subjugation - other than to bury those who attempt it. B.E.Wood


TreyHouston
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1866
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 5:00 pm
Location: Tomball

Re: Secret audio recording of Texas House Speaker released

#6

Post by TreyHouston » Wed Oct 16, 2019 9:13 am

anygunanywhere wrote:
Wed Oct 16, 2019 7:46 am
narcissist wrote:
Tue Oct 15, 2019 11:05 pm
Secret recordings I thought were not valid in Law/Court? Please correct me if im wrong, maybe explain how to go about it legally ect.
What matters most is the court of voter opinion.
:iagree:
"Jump in there sport, get it done and we'll all sing your praises." -Chas

How many times a day could you say this? :cheers2:

User avatar

ELB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 7494
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: Seguin

Re: Secret audio recording of Texas House Speaker released

#7

Post by ELB » Wed Oct 16, 2019 9:46 am

warnmar10 wrote:
Wed Oct 16, 2019 7:45 am
narcissist wrote:
Tue Oct 15, 2019 11:05 pm
Secret recordings I thought were not valid in Law/Court? Please correct me if im wrong, maybe explain how to go about it legally ect.
What difference does it make whether the recordings are admissible in court or not?
Makes a big difference to Speaker Bonnen!
USAF 1982-2005
____________
“The only thing more enjoyable than seeing your opponent lose an election they rigged is seeing them lose an investigation they rigged.” Author unknown but dead on the mark.


crazy2medic
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1809
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2015 9:59 am

Re: Secret audio recording of Texas House Speaker released

#8

Post by crazy2medic » Wed Oct 16, 2019 10:45 am

The one thing that matters to me the most is that this guy is NOT House Speaker next legislative Session!
Government, like fire is a dangerous servant and a fearful master
If you ain't paranoid you ain't paying attention
Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war let it begin here- John Parker

User avatar

rtschl
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 913
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 1:50 pm
Location: Fort Worth

Re: Secret audio recording of Texas House Speaker released

#9

Post by rtschl » Wed Oct 16, 2019 11:01 am

It does matter:

Texas Constitution Article 16, Section 41:

Sec. 41. BRIBERY AND SOLICITATION OR ACCEPTANCE OF BRIBES. Any person who shall, directly or indirectly, offer, give, or promise, any money or thing of value, testimonial, privilege or personal advantage, to any executive or judicial officer or member of the Legislature to influence him in the performance of any of his public or official duties, shall be guilty of bribery, and be punished in such manner as shall be provided by law. And any member of the Legislature or executive or judicial officer who shall solicit, demand or receive, or consent to receive, directly or indirectly, for himself, or for another, from any company, corporation or person, any money, appointment, employment, testimonial, reward, thing of value or employment, or of personal advantage or promise thereof, for his vote or official influence, or for withholding the same, or with any understanding, expressed or implied, that his vote or official action shall be in any way influenced thereby, or who shall solicit, demand and receive any such money or other advantage matter or thing aforesaid for another, as the consideration of his vote or official influence, in consideration of the payment or promise of such money, advantage, matter or thing to another, shall be held guilty of bribery, within the meaning of the Constitution, and shall incur the disabilities provided for said offenses, with a forfeiture of the office they may hold, and such other additional punishment as is or shall be provided by law.
Ron
NRA Member

User avatar

ELB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 7494
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: Seguin

Re: Secret audio recording of Texas House Speaker released

#10

Post by ELB » Wed Oct 16, 2019 12:00 pm

It appears to me from various articles on this that Sullivan made the recording and he was the target of Bonnen's offer to give Sullivan's organization (Empower Texans) credentials in return for working against certain Republicans. In other words, the recording was made by one of the parties to the conversation, and was not illegally made.
USAF 1982-2005
____________
“The only thing more enjoyable than seeing your opponent lose an election they rigged is seeing them lose an investigation they rigged.” Author unknown but dead on the mark.

Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”