BCM vs DD

"A pistol is what you use to fight your way back to the rifle you never should have left behind!" Clint Smith, Thunder Ranch

Moderators: Keith B, carlson1

Post Reply

Topic author
newTexan
Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 180
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2008 10:20 am

BCM vs DD

#1

Post by newTexan » Tue Aug 27, 2019 7:11 pm

Hey guys,

So I'm interested in getting a "nice" AR15. I've had my eye on Daniel Defense and BCM as candidates in that category and I'm doing my research. Do any of y'all have much to say about either that might tip the scales one way or the other?

Thanks!


Grayling813
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 553
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2019 11:18 am

Re: BCM vs DD

#2

Post by Grayling813 » Tue Aug 27, 2019 7:54 pm

As far as I know the CEO of BCM hasn’t publicly supported more gun control like Marty Daniel did.

DD went off my wish list and was replaced by BCM.


Topic author
newTexan
Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 180
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2008 10:20 am

Re: BCM vs DD

#3

Post by newTexan » Tue Aug 27, 2019 8:10 pm

Hmm I was not aware of that aspect. Good to know.


SigM4
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 696
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 11:14 am
Location: Willow Park

Re: BCM vs DD

#4

Post by SigM4 » Tue Aug 27, 2019 8:18 pm

I have examples of each, and while the DD is very nice, to me the BCM is better. Fit and finish are excellent on both, so really whichever one you can find a deal on. Don’t think you’d be disappointed with either.
Success always occurs in private, and failure in full view.

User avatar

rtschl
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 845
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 1:50 pm
Location: Fort Worth

Re: BCM vs DD

#5

Post by rtschl » Wed Aug 28, 2019 3:03 am

I haven't fired a DD rifle, but I can say that I love my BCM.
Ron
NRA Member

User avatar

AndyC
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 10574
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 12:34 pm
Location: Garland, TX

Re: BCM vs DD

#6

Post by AndyC » Wed Aug 28, 2019 8:45 am

Grayling813 wrote:
Tue Aug 27, 2019 7:54 pm
As far as I know the CEO of BCM hasn’t publicly supported more gun control like Marty Daniel did.
:iagree:
Remember Kitty Genovese

Image

Amateurs skip safety-checks - pros don't.
Preferred Travel Agent - 72 Virgins Dating Club, Iraq
There's nothing quite like the offer of 230 grains to a man's chest to remind him of his manners

User avatar

Lena
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 615
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2016 1:51 pm
Location: Cash Texas

Re: BCM vs DD

#7

Post by Lena » Wed Aug 28, 2019 1:47 pm

Have 3 all shoot 100%
Colt
Rock River
LMT

The RR by far shoots better, much better trigger, very accurate & never 1 problem, the Colt is the worse of all but the oldest by far.
Stay Safe

User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 25255
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: BCM vs DD

#8

Post by The Annoyed Man » Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:32 pm

I have no experience with DD, but I have two complete BCM uppers—a 11.5” for my SBR, and a 20” government profile for an A4 replica. Both are of the highest build quality, using cold hammer forged barrels. Both are quite accurate for what they are.

I also have a couple of BCM LPKs. One is in my safe, waiting to be used, and the other is in my A4.

BCM uppers are built to the most exacting standards. I have to assume that their lowers are also built to that standard.

20” upper: https://www.bravocompanyusa.com/BCM-M16 ... gov-20.htm

11.5” upper: https://www.bravocompanyusa.com/BCM-BFH ... r-a-10.htm

Read the specs on these uppers, and you’ll see the quality.

https://www.slip2000.com/blog/s-w-a-t-m ... filthy-14/
FILTHY 14

As of this writing, EAG students have 31,165 rounds downrange through Filthy 14. During this evaluation period, it was cleaned once (as in one time), at 26,245 rounds. The end result is that Rack #14 was—and remains—filthy. It is filthy because it has been shot at class. Only at class. Every round that has gone down that barrel has been fired at class, with an average of approximately 1,300 rounds every three days. It has been lubed generously with Slip 2000 Extreme Weapons Lube (EWL).

The combination of carbon and lube create (wait for it)…filth. It is so dirty that, while sitting in the rifle rack, it is almost a biohazard. The filth oozes out and contaminates other carbines adjacent to it.

But it is still shooting—and shooting well.
Few things in life are that reliable.
Give me Liberty, or I'll get up and get it myself.—Hookalakah Meshobbab
I don't carry because of the odds, I carry because of the stakes.—The Annoyed Boy
My dream is to have lived my life so well that future generations of leftists will demand my name be removed from buildings.


Grayling813
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 553
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2019 11:18 am

Re: BCM vs DD

#9

Post by Grayling813 » Wed Aug 28, 2019 6:29 pm

Military Arms Channel testing of BCM, 5000+ rounds.
We take the BCM back out to the range and get a total of 5010 rounds through it and then perform an accuracy test. We are not doing any maintenance to the rifle, no oil, no wipe down, nothing. We're loading and shooting copious amounts of Federal .223 American Eagle.


Topic author
newTexan
Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 180
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2008 10:20 am

Re: BCM vs DD

#10

Post by newTexan » Wed Aug 28, 2019 6:53 pm

Very interesting.

I'll admit that the BCM RECCE-14 MCMR in particular looks like a very fun gun to shoot. hmmmm

User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 25255
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: BCM vs DD

#11

Post by The Annoyed Man » Wed Aug 28, 2019 10:40 pm

newTexan wrote:
Wed Aug 28, 2019 6:53 pm
Very interesting.

I'll admit that the BCM RECCE-14 MCMR in particular looks like a very fun gun to shoot. hmmmm
The three upper tier brands that interest me most for the AR platform are BCM, DD, and FN.

I have almost no exposure to any DD products. I mostly only know what I’ve read about their manufacturing quality, and not their gun politics reputation, but it’s all second hand knowledge with the exception of a DD BCG in one of my carbines—which seems exceedingly well made.

The barrel is the heart of any rifle, and FN barrels are among the very best in the business. The first time I ever shot my SCAR 17, it put 10 rounds into 3/4" at 100 yards.....and that’s from a pencil barrel. Several other AR "assembler" brands boast that they offer FN barrels, or barrels made out of "FN machine gun steel" in some of their products. I have no reason to believe that an FN AR isn’t every bit as well barreled as the SCAR, whose barrel is cold hammer forged (CHF).

I have the most experience of the three with BCM, but only with their barreled upper receivers, and a few of their accessories. Their "About Us" page says:
Bravo Company started in the garage of a veteran United States Marine in Hartland Wisconsin, shortly after Operation Iraqi Freedom in 2003.

Founded to support the needs of Private Security Professionals working in theaters where durable mil-spec components for their weapon systems were not readily available, BCM (Bravo Company MFG, Inc.) builds professional grade weaponry manufactured, reinforced and tested to meet the unforgiving needs of professional Soldiers, Law Enforcement and responsible citizens in some of the most high threat environments in the world.
As I posted previously, I own two BCM uppers—one with a 20" gov’t profile "M16" barrel, and one with a 11.5" SBR barrel. The 20" is 100% milspec. The 11.5" is both 100% milspec and CHF. If I had to dump all of my ARs and could only keep one, it would be either of those two rifles. And of those two, as much as I love my SBR, I’d probably go with the 20" for its superior ballistics, even though it is heavier and "merely" milspec without a CHF barrel.

If I were buying a new complete AR from one of those three manufacturers, it would be either a BCM, based on my experience with their uppers, or a FN based on my experience with my SCAR 17. The price for similarly equipped M4 configured ARs seems to favor the BCM by about $150 or so. Both the BCM and the FN M4s are in the range of $1500 or higher, but FNs are the more expensive of the two. This does not mean that I think that the DD is inferior to those two.....it does not. It merely means that I already know of two manufacturers whose rifles meet my preferences, and so no need to look further. If I had DD experience, I might feel differently about it.
Give me Liberty, or I'll get up and get it myself.—Hookalakah Meshobbab
I don't carry because of the odds, I carry because of the stakes.—The Annoyed Boy
My dream is to have lived my life so well that future generations of leftists will demand my name be removed from buildings.

User avatar

carlson1
Moderator
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 10236
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 1:11 am

Re: BCM vs DD

#12

Post by carlson1 » Wed Aug 28, 2019 11:09 pm

I have two Daniel Defense and love both of them. I also have a SBR Spikes Tactical and like it also. I am no expert, but I personally believe between the Spikes and DD the DD wins hands down.
Image

User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 25255
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: BCM vs DD

#13

Post by The Annoyed Man » Wed Aug 28, 2019 11:57 pm

carlson1 wrote:
Wed Aug 28, 2019 11:09 pm
I have two Daniel Defense and love both of them. I also have a SBR Spikes Tactical and like it also. I am no expert, but I personally believe between the Spikes and DD the DD wins hands down.
I have some high end components from Spikes (receiver sets, buffers, etc.) and they’re pretty nice, but they’re VERY expensive.
Give me Liberty, or I'll get up and get it myself.—Hookalakah Meshobbab
I don't carry because of the odds, I carry because of the stakes.—The Annoyed Boy
My dream is to have lived my life so well that future generations of leftists will demand my name be removed from buildings.

Post Reply

Return to “Rifles & Shotguns”