California Drops ‘Good Cause’ Requirement for Concealed Carry Following SCOTUS 2A Ruling

Discussion of other state's CHL's & reciprocity

Moderators: carlson1, Keith B

Post Reply
User avatar

Topic author
Paladin
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 6313
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:02 pm
Location: DFW

California Drops ‘Good Cause’ Requirement for Concealed Carry Following SCOTUS 2A Ruling

#1

Post by Paladin »

California Drops ‘Good Cause’ Requirement for Concealed Carry Following SCOTUS 2A Ruling
Although Bruen concerns a New York law, the Bruen majority specifically identifies California as one of six States that has an analogue to New York’s “proper cause” standard. … Accordingly, it is the Attorney General’s view that the Court’s decision renders California’s “good cause” standard to secure a permit to carry a concealed weapon in most public places unconstitutional. Permitting agencies may no longer require a demonstration of “good cause” in order to obtain a concealed carry permit.
:thewave :thewave :thewave
JOIN NRA TODAY!, NRA Benefactor Life, TSRA Defender Life, Gun Owners of America Life, SAF, FPC, VCDL Member
LTC/SSC Instructor, NRA Certified Instructor, CRSO
The last hope of human liberty in this world rests on us. -Thomas Jefferson
User avatar

Topic author
Paladin
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 6313
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:02 pm
Location: DFW

Re: California Drops ‘Good Cause’ Requirement for Concealed Carry Following SCOTUS 2A Ruling

#2

Post by Paladin »

On June 24 New Jersey responded to the ruling by ending its “justifiable need” requirement for concealed carry permit issuance.

New Jersey acting Attorney General Matt Platkin released a directive which said, in part: “In reviewing an individual’s application for a permit to carry, the applicable law enforcement agency shall continue to ensure that the applicant satisfies all of the criteria of N.J.S.A. 2C:58-4d and N.J.A.C. 13:54-2.4, except that the applicant need not submit a written certification of justifiable need to carry a handgun.”
The life of crime is getting more dangerous by the day.
JOIN NRA TODAY!, NRA Benefactor Life, TSRA Defender Life, Gun Owners of America Life, SAF, FPC, VCDL Member
LTC/SSC Instructor, NRA Certified Instructor, CRSO
The last hope of human liberty in this world rests on us. -Thomas Jefferson

Papa_Tiger
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 867
Joined: Fri May 24, 2013 9:55 am

Re: California Drops ‘Good Cause’ Requirement for Concealed Carry Following SCOTUS 2A Ruling

#3

Post by Papa_Tiger »

Paladin wrote: Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:10 am California Drops ‘Good Cause’ Requirement for Concealed Carry Following SCOTUS 2A Ruling
Although Bruen concerns a New York law, the Bruen majority specifically identifies California as one of six States that has an analogue to New York’s “proper cause” standard. … Accordingly, it is the Attorney General’s view that the Court’s decision renders California’s “good cause” standard to secure a permit to carry a concealed weapon in most public places unconstitutional. Permitting agencies may no longer require a demonstration of “good cause” in order to obtain a concealed carry permit.
:thewave :thewave :thewave
And yet, they are shifting the subjective standard to requiring the applicant to "be of good moral character" to bypass the subjective "good cause" requirement. Nothing has changed and it will still be impossible to get a CCL in CA.
User avatar

oohrah
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1366
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 5:54 pm
Location: McLennan County

Re: California Drops ‘Good Cause’ Requirement for Concealed Carry Following SCOTUS 2A Ruling

#4

Post by oohrah »

Papa_Tiger wrote: Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:46 am
Paladin wrote: Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:10 am California Drops ‘Good Cause’ Requirement for Concealed Carry Following SCOTUS 2A Ruling
Although Bruen concerns a New York law, the Bruen majority specifically identifies California as one of six States that has an analogue to New York’s “proper cause” standard. … Accordingly, it is the Attorney General’s view that the Court’s decision renders California’s “good cause” standard to secure a permit to carry a concealed weapon in most public places unconstitutional. Permitting agencies may no longer require a demonstration of “good cause” in order to obtain a concealed carry permit.
:thewave :thewave :thewave
And yet, they are shifting the subjective standard to requiring the applicant to "be of good moral character" to bypass the subjective "good cause" requirement. Nothing has changed and it will still be impossible to get a CCL in CA.
And IIRC, New Jersey requires three letters of character references.
USMC, Retired
Treating one variety of person as better or worse than others by accident of birth is morally indefensible.

K.Mooneyham
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 4:27 pm
Location: Vernon, Texas

Re: California Drops ‘Good Cause’ Requirement for Concealed Carry Following SCOTUS 2A Ruling

#5

Post by K.Mooneyham »

Papa_Tiger wrote: Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:46 am
Paladin wrote: Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:10 am California Drops ‘Good Cause’ Requirement for Concealed Carry Following SCOTUS 2A Ruling
Although Bruen concerns a New York law, the Bruen majority specifically identifies California as one of six States that has an analogue to New York’s “proper cause” standard. … Accordingly, it is the Attorney General’s view that the Court’s decision renders California’s “good cause” standard to secure a permit to carry a concealed weapon in most public places unconstitutional. Permitting agencies may no longer require a demonstration of “good cause” in order to obtain a concealed carry permit.
:thewave :thewave :thewave
And yet, they are shifting the subjective standard to requiring the applicant to "be of good moral character" to bypass the subjective "good cause" requirement. Nothing has changed and it will still be impossible to get a CCL in CA.
California issues permits per county. I believe a few more counties will now make it easier to get a carry permit, but yes, the most leftwing counties will still find ways to block people being able to carry.
User avatar

oohrah
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1366
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 5:54 pm
Location: McLennan County

Re: California Drops ‘Good Cause’ Requirement for Concealed Carry Following SCOTUS 2A Ruling

#6

Post by oohrah »

New Jersey AG just issued a letter that "show cause" is no longer required. And, NJ does not distinguish between resident and non-resident.
USMC, Retired
Treating one variety of person as better or worse than others by accident of birth is morally indefensible.
User avatar

Topic author
Paladin
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 6313
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:02 pm
Location: DFW

Re: California Drops ‘Good Cause’ Requirement for Concealed Carry Following SCOTUS 2A Ruling

#7

Post by Paladin »

oohrah wrote: Wed Jun 29, 2022 2:58 pm New Jersey AG just issued a letter that "show cause" is no longer required. And, NJ does not distinguish between resident and non-resident.
:cheers2:
JOIN NRA TODAY!, NRA Benefactor Life, TSRA Defender Life, Gun Owners of America Life, SAF, FPC, VCDL Member
LTC/SSC Instructor, NRA Certified Instructor, CRSO
The last hope of human liberty in this world rests on us. -Thomas Jefferson
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 26796
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: California Drops ‘Good Cause’ Requirement for Concealed Carry Following SCOTUS 2A Ruling

#8

Post by The Annoyed Man »

K.Mooneyham wrote: Tue Jun 28, 2022 11:03 am
Papa_Tiger wrote: Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:46 am
Paladin wrote: Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:10 am California Drops ‘Good Cause’ Requirement for Concealed Carry Following SCOTUS 2A Ruling
Although Bruen concerns a New York law, the Bruen majority specifically identifies California as one of six States that has an analogue to New York’s “proper cause” standard. … Accordingly, it is the Attorney General’s view that the Court’s decision renders California’s “good cause” standard to secure a permit to carry a concealed weapon in most public places unconstitutional. Permitting agencies may no longer require a demonstration of “good cause” in order to obtain a concealed carry permit.
:thewave :thewave :thewave
And yet, they are shifting the subjective standard to requiring the applicant to "be of good moral character" to bypass the subjective "good cause" requirement. Nothing has changed and it will still be impossible to get a CCL in CA.
California issues permits per county. I believe a few more counties will now make it easier to get a carry permit, but yes, the most leftwing counties will still find ways to block people being able to carry.
Volokh says maybe otherwise…

https://reason.com/volokh/2022/06/26/st ... -licenses/
But the [California] AG's office concludes that the existing statutory requirement "that a public-carry license applicant provide proof of 'good moral character' remains constitutional," and that this requirement isn't limited to disqualifying felons, certain violent misdemeanants, and the like. And in particular the AG's office suggests that people who hold certain ideological viewpoints should be disqualified……

As to how law enforcement is to figure out such matters, the AG's office has some advice: Among other things,
As a starting point for purposes of investigating an applicant's moral character, many issuing authorities require personal references and/or reference letters. Investigators may personally interview applicants and use the opportunity to gain further insight into the applicant's character. And they may search publicly-available information, including social media accounts, in assessing the applicant's character. [Emphasis added.]
The commies are going to fight this tooth and nail, and drag it out for YEARS, because they know that they cannot ultimately prevail when the people have the power to say no. We'll win in the end, but it’s going to take a long time, and cost a lot of money.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar

AF-Odin
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 725
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 7:00 pm
Location: Near Fort Cavazos (formerly Hood)

Re: California Drops ‘Good Cause’ Requirement for Concealed Carry Following SCOTUS 2A Ruling

#9

Post by AF-Odin »

Just look at what New York just did. Now, for those folks outside the "City" life just got a lot harder and many more places off limits. Seems their legislature and Governor think the world revolves around one city and their views that peasants should not be allowed to carry anywhere.
AF-Odin
Texas LTC, SSC & FRC Instructor
NRA Pistol, Home Firearms Safety, Personal Protection in the Home Instructor & RSO
NRA & TSRA Life Member
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 26796
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: California Drops ‘Good Cause’ Requirement for Concealed Carry Following SCOTUS 2A Ruling

#10

Post by The Annoyed Man »

AF-Odin wrote: Sun Jul 03, 2022 8:50 am Just look at what New York just did. Now, for those folks outside the "City" life just got a lot harder and many more places off limits. Seems their legislature and Governor think the world revolves around one city and their views that peasants should not be allowed to carry anywhere.
And the Governor of Delaware just signed 5 new gun-control bills into law, including an AWB. The lines are being drawn for a national divorce.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT

K.Mooneyham
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 4:27 pm
Location: Vernon, Texas

Re: California Drops ‘Good Cause’ Requirement for Concealed Carry Following SCOTUS 2A Ruling

#11

Post by K.Mooneyham »

AF-Odin wrote: Sun Jul 03, 2022 8:50 am Just look at what New York just did. Now, for those folks outside the "City" life just got a lot harder and many more places off limits. Seems their legislature and Governor think the world revolves around one city and their views that peasants should not be allowed to carry anywhere.
Yes, indeed, and that's one of the reasons we have the Electoral College, so that a handful of big cities cannot decide who runs the nation.
Post Reply

Return to “Other States”