Oregon Confiscation Law

Discussion of other state's CHL's & reciprocity

Moderators: carlson1, Keith B

Post Reply

Topic author
chasfm11
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 3315
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:01 pm
Location: Northern DFW

Oregon Confiscation Law

#1

Post by chasfm11 » Sat Jul 08, 2017 11:28 am

I'm a little concerned about this one. None of the local Oregon media outlets are carrying it but it appears in a number of the gun blogs
It looks like a Republican, after a personal loss, is trying to make sure that others don't have that same experience but at the expense of many.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/07 ... an-helped/
6/23-8/13/10 -51 days to plastic
Dun Spiro Spero

User avatar

puma guy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5741
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:23 pm
Location: Near San Jacinto

Re: Oregon Confiscation Law

#2

Post by puma guy » Sat Jul 08, 2017 12:49 pm

We can only hope the AYE voters are reported as a danger to themselves and others. They didn't include knives, clubs/bats, hammers, tire tools, etc. Wonder why? :headscratch This will eventually be struck down, IMHO. Beside eliminating due process, there's way too much room for abuse of the law.
KAHR PM40/Hoffner IWB and S&W Mod 60/ Galco IWB
NRA Endowment Member, TSRA Life Member,100 Club Life Member,TFC Member
My Faith, My Gun and My Constitution: I cling to all three!
Image


crazy2medic
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 947
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2015 9:59 am

Re: Oregon Confiscation Law

#3

Post by crazy2medic » Sat Jul 08, 2017 3:32 pm

puma guy wrote:We can only hope the AYE voters are reported as a danger to themselves and others. They didn't include knives, clubs/bats, hammers, tire tools, etc. Wonder why? :headscratch This will eventually be struck down, IMHO. Beside eliminating due process, there's way too much room for abuse of the law.
:iagree:
Government, like fire is a dangerous servant and a fearful master
If you ain't paranoid you ain't paying attention


Ameer
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1356
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 8:01 pm

Re: Oregon Confiscation Law

#4

Post by Ameer » Sat Jul 08, 2017 7:27 pm

So what they're saying is we should cache a backup that we can use it to recover the others. Like for computers.
I believe the basic political division in this country is not between liberals and conservatives but between those who believe that they should have a say in the personal lives of strangers and those who do not.


flechero
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2147
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 5:04 pm
Location: Central Texas

Re: Oregon Confiscation Law

#5

Post by flechero » Sat Jul 08, 2017 7:42 pm

I wonder if a wrongfully accused person can sue the ill-intentioned accuser in civil court?? That would be a way to keep it in check- financial ruin for a wrongful accuser.

If not, first anonymous accusation should go against the dem's personal security personnel.


strogg
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 469
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 1:51 pm
Location: DFW (Denton County)

Re: Oregon Confiscation Law

#6

Post by strogg » Sat Jul 08, 2017 8:14 pm

As if the household thing wasn't bad enough... I read this bit on the site:
It also allows any police officer to make the same accusations about you to a judge. The police officer does not need to know you or even have ever met you.
Welp, if that goes through, both 2A and 4A are basically done in Oregon. There's no way this will pass in its current form.


Topic author
chasfm11
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 3315
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:01 pm
Location: Northern DFW

Re: Oregon Confiscation Law

#7

Post by chasfm11 » Sat Jul 08, 2017 10:10 pm

strogg wrote:As if the household thing wasn't bad enough... I read this bit on the site:
It also allows any police officer to make the same accusations about you to a judge. The police officer does not need to know you or even have ever met you.
Welp, if that goes through, both 2A and 4A are basically done in Oregon. There's no way this will pass in its current form.
One of the news stories said that it had passed the House and was enroute to the governor's office. That report suggested that she were certain to sign it.

Based on articles that I've read about other subjects in Oregon, the Bill of Rights is a waste of time there. I think they they more Progressive than California.
6/23-8/13/10 -51 days to plastic
Dun Spiro Spero


strogg
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 469
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 1:51 pm
Location: DFW (Denton County)

Re: Oregon Confiscation Law

#8

Post by strogg » Sun Jul 09, 2017 10:57 am

That is very sad to hear. It's disappointing to see that some states are just going so "progressive" that their governments are turning into authoritarian regimes. That really does sound ironic to me. Their next hope now, I guess, is an injunction on the bill like the standard capacity magazine ban of California. Until then, I've visited Oregon already and got my fill. I'm not planning on going back there anytime soon.

User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 8530
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: Oregon Confiscation Law

#9

Post by mojo84 » Sun Jul 09, 2017 1:40 pm

This kind of stuff is scary. Instead of evaluating the potentially dangerous person to see if he is really a threat or needs help, just go take his guns. Yeah, that's the answer.

I just don't see how such a law such as this would have helped the republican and his son. Had the republican exhausted all other options to get his son help? With a law like this, it's too easy to claim someone is a danger and have their guns confiscated and rights trampled. I might could see it if the claim of someone might be a danger triggered an investigation and evaluation while maintaining the person's rights to due process.

User avatar

cheezit
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1052
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 9:10 pm
Location: far n fortworh

Re: Oregon Confiscation Law

#10

Post by cheezit » Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:16 pm

chasfm11 wrote:
strogg wrote:As if the household thing wasn't bad enough... I read this bit on the site:
It also allows any police officer to make the same accusations about you to a judge. The police officer does not need to know you or even have ever met you.
Welp, if that goes through, both 2A and 4A are basically done in Oregon. There's no way this will pass in its current form.
One of the news stories said that it had passed the House and was enroute to the governor's office. That report suggested that she were certain to sign it.

Based on articles that I've read about other subjects in Oregon, the Bill of Rights is a waste of time there. I think they they more Progressive than California.
Really the state has the same exact issues as California and Illinois, the state is ruled by a few liberal cities.

Post Reply

Return to “Other States”