KEN PAXTON sues the ATF

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply
User avatar

Topic author
Paladin
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 6327
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:02 pm
Location: DFW

KEN PAXTON sues the ATF

#1

Post by Paladin »

JOIN NRA TODAY!, NRA Benefactor Life, TSRA Defender Life, Gun Owners of America Life, SAF, FPC, VCDL Member
LTC/SSC Instructor, NRA Certified Instructor, CRSO
The last hope of human liberty in this world rests on us. -Thomas Jefferson
User avatar

RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 9509
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: KEN PAXTON sues the ATF

#2

Post by RoyGBiv »

SCOTUS precedent is that something made locally does affect "Interstate Commerce", because it causes less consumption of similar goods made in other states.

This is pure theater. Unfortunately.
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek
User avatar

Jago668
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 992
Joined: Sun May 03, 2015 12:31 am

Re: KEN PAXTON sues the ATF

#3

Post by Jago668 »

SCOTUS lets way too much stuff slip through interstate commerce.
NRA Benefactor Member
User avatar

Topic author
Paladin
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 6327
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:02 pm
Location: DFW

Re: KEN PAXTON sues the ATF

#4

Post by Paladin »

RoyGBiv wrote: Thu Feb 24, 2022 6:02 pm SCOTUS precedent is that something made locally does affect "Interstate Commerce", because it causes less consumption of similar goods made in other states.

This is pure theater. Unfortunately.
That is precedent, but incorrect, authoritarian precedent. So its worth it to challenge the bad precedent alone.
JOIN NRA TODAY!, NRA Benefactor Life, TSRA Defender Life, Gun Owners of America Life, SAF, FPC, VCDL Member
LTC/SSC Instructor, NRA Certified Instructor, CRSO
The last hope of human liberty in this world rests on us. -Thomas Jefferson

srothstein
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5274
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
Location: Luling, TX

Re: KEN PAXTON sues the ATF

#5

Post by srothstein »

Paladin wrote: Thu Feb 24, 2022 8:28 pm
RoyGBiv wrote: Thu Feb 24, 2022 6:02 pm SCOTUS precedent is that something made locally does affect "Interstate Commerce", because it causes less consumption of similar goods made in other states.

This is pure theater. Unfortunately.
That is precedent, but incorrect, authoritarian precedent. So its worth it to challenge the bad precedent alone.
:iagree: 100%
Steve Rothstein
User avatar

RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 9509
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: KEN PAXTON sues the ATF

#6

Post by RoyGBiv »

Paladin wrote: Thu Feb 24, 2022 8:28 pm
RoyGBiv wrote: Thu Feb 24, 2022 6:02 pm SCOTUS precedent is that something made locally does affect "Interstate Commerce", because it causes less consumption of similar goods made in other states.

This is pure theater. Unfortunately.
That is precedent, but incorrect, authoritarian precedent. So its worth it to challenge the bad precedent alone.
I agree, of course. But, a gun case is predestined to fail. It may even reinforce the bad precedent, because guns.
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek

NotRPB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1351
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 8:24 am

Re: KEN PAXTON sues the ATF

#7

Post by NotRPB »

RoyGBiv wrote: Thu Feb 24, 2022 6:02 pm SCOTUS precedent is that something made locally does affect "Interstate Commerce", because it causes less consumption of similar goods made in other states.

This is pure theater. Unfortunately.
However, The logic/rationale might be ...it cannot cause "less" consumption of an item having "zero" consumption in other States ... as it's a banned item per the ATF ... right?

seph
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 192
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 12:01 am

Re: KEN PAXTON sues the ATF

#8

Post by seph »

This is in response to HB957 passed last session. The attorney general is required to file this lawsuit.
First, a private citizen looking to manufacture Texas-made suppressors must first tell the state attorney general. Then, the attorney general would seek a declaratory judgment from a federal court that HB 957 complies with the U.S. Constitution.
Also, maybe this will the first salvo to revamp the commerce clause's current interpretation.
Let's go Brandon! "rlol"
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”