Page 1 of 2
Another example of what we are up against
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:52 pm
by 03Lightningrocks
I sign up for emails from various organizations so I can be aware of what they are up to. This email just arrived, but I have been steady getting these from them for several months now. If you remember, part of the bragging from the Odumbell campaign the last time was about all the private money he was getting for his campaign.
Remember to make sure the good guys don't get out spent this time and when you get a request for some financial help... Try to do something... Anything is better than nothing. Heck... Send them two bucks if it is all you can afford. We need to get Odumbell out of Washington folks!
Here is a copy of the email
Friend --
Sorry to bug you on a Saturday. The FEC wouldn't let us push back their big March 31st deadline. (I tried.)
Just hours to go -- please chip in $75
There was a link here, but I edited it out
Thanks.
Rufus
Rufus Gifford
National Finance Director
Obama for America
Contributions or gifts to Obama for America are not tax deductible.
This email was sent to:
plano.air@verizon.net
Update address | Unsubscribe
Re: Another example of what we are up against
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:55 pm
by 03Lightningrocks
I also received a few from the NAACP the past few days that borderline on inspiring an uprising! I didn't post them but will if anyone wants more garbage to argue over. You can guess what they were using as the platform!
Re: Another example of what we are up against
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 4:35 pm
by waybig
Yep, they are gearing up.
Re: Another example of what we are up against
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 7:22 pm
by Lambda Force
http://lewrockwell.com/slavo/slavo101.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
It appears that the Trayvon Martin incident, while tragic for all the families involved, may very well be a boon for the Obama administration and just the incident they were waiting for.
Before any investigation had taken place, and only rumors and haphazard incomplete reports were available, the media was already spinning the story of the white Hispanic and the African American teenager. Whether Zimmerman is guilty or not, whether Trayvon Martin initiated the assault or not, is of no consequence now. The narrative has taken on a life of it’s own, and the sole purpose is to divide and conquer the American people through Weapons of Mass Distraction, furthering the cause of the absolute police state.
The President himself stepped in to the conflict, suggesting that if he had a son, he would look like Trayvon. Congressman Bobby Rush wore a hooded sweatshirt on the floor of the House of Representatives in protest, as did Miami Heat basketball players. What exactly it is that they’re protesting, we’re not sure.
What we are confident of, however, is that this incident has gone viral, and it is sure to spiral further out of control, potentially making the Rodney King riots of the 1990?s pale in comparison – especially if Zimmerman is not charged with a crime.
Stay alert and CARRY EVERYWHERE.
Re: Another example of what we are up against
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 9:57 pm
by The Annoyed Man
I carried illegally in downtown LA during the Rodney King riots. That was an "interesting time," to borrow from a Chinese curse.
Re: Another example of what we are up against
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 10:10 pm
by 03Lightningrocks
I am suddenly thinking maybe the AR15 in the trunk was not such a bad idea after all.
Re: Another example of what we are up against
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2012 3:20 pm
by tbrown
It's a good idea in these times, assuming you can get it out of the trunk in time.
Re: Another example of what we are up against
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2012 4:43 pm
by Katygunnut
03Lightningrocks wrote:I am suddenly thinking maybe the AR15 in the trunk was not such a bad idea after all.
What's it doing in the trunk?
Actually, I think a shotgun might be more useful in a situation where I am boxed in and unable to escape using my vehicle. Pretty much always going to involve CQB I think.
Re: Another example of what we are up against
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 5:55 pm
by Texbow
What gets me is the attention this incident has raised. I would like to know how many black children (under the age of 18) have been murdered by other blacks in the US. What makes this special? Has every black murder suspect that has shot or killed other black children been arrested? I'm sure all those other dead children's parents were as hurt as the Martins. I'm convinced that any excuse to play the race card will always be with us. How smart does someone have to be to understand that Jackson and Sharpton are only using this for their own agenda. Are people that dumb?
Do we have white Hispanics, red Hispanics, yellow Hispanics? Maybe I have missed something, is he half Hispanic and half white?
Seems to me that I would be investigating who Martin purchased marijuana from, how much has he purchased, how did he get the money and if his DNA matched any found at any of the burglarized homes. Was he stealing things to get the money for marijuana?
Re: Another example of what we are up against
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 6:08 pm
by EconDoc
The racists on the left have never cared about minority on minority crime. They only care when an incident can be used for propaganda to advance their cause.
Re: Another example of what we are up against
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 6:13 pm
by 74novaman
From all accounts Obama doesn't seem to be hauling in the big bucks he predicted he'd have for his reelection run.
I take that as a good sign for November.
Re: Another example of what we are up against
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 6:42 pm
by Katygunnut
Texbow wrote:Do we have white Hispanics, red Hispanics, yellow Hispanics? Maybe I have missed something, is he half Hispanic and half white?
By the same standard, I think our President is officially a "White African", or "White Negro" since one parent is white and the other is black.
Or maybe he is a "Black Caucasian". After all, in the Martin case the Dad's race (white) is used before the Mom's race (hispanic). This is all so confusing! Maybe the nice folks at MSNBC can clarify this latest term for the PC labeling of race.
For full disclosure, my dad is of Spanish heritage, but he was born in the US (his father immigrated from Spain); and my Mom is Irish. I think that makes me a "Hispanic Irish" man, or maybe I can use the more generic "white" term for my Irish heritage, which would make me a "Hispanic White" man. I guess I am the opposite of Mr Zimmerman, kind of.
Re: Another example of what we are up against
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 6:55 pm
by Tamie
Katygunnut wrote:Texbow wrote:Do we have white Hispanics, red Hispanics, yellow Hispanics? Maybe I have missed something, is he half Hispanic and half white?
By the same standard, I think our President is officially a "White African", or "White Negro" since one parent is white and the other is black.
Or maybe he is a "Black Caucasian". After all, in the Martin case the Dad's race (white) is used before the Mom's race (hispanic). This is all so confusing! Maybe the nice folks at MSNBC can clarify this latest term for the PC labeling of race.
For full disclosure, my dad is of Spanish heritage, but he was born in the US (his father immigrated from Spain); and my Mom is Irish. I think that makes me a "Hispanic Irish" man, or maybe I can use the more generic "white" term for my Irish heritage, which would make me a "Hispanic White" man. I guess I am the opposite of Mr Zimmerman, kind of.
White Negro is correct following the MSM's standards for Zimmerman.
Re: Another example of what we are up against
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 7:07 pm
by sjfcontrol
Tamie wrote:Katygunnut wrote:Texbow wrote:Do we have white Hispanics, red Hispanics, yellow Hispanics? Maybe I have missed something, is he half Hispanic and half white?
By the same standard, I think our President is officially a "White African", or "White Negro" since one parent is white and the other is black.
Or maybe he is a "Black Caucasian". After all, in the Martin case the Dad's race (white) is used before the Mom's race (hispanic). This is all so confusing! Maybe the nice folks at MSNBC can clarify this latest term for the PC labeling of race.
For full disclosure, my dad is of Spanish heritage, but he was born in the US (his father immigrated from Spain); and my Mom is Irish. I think that makes me a "Hispanic Irish" man, or maybe I can use the more generic "white" term for my Irish heritage, which would make me a "Hispanic White" man. I guess I am the opposite of Mr Zimmerman, kind of.
White Negro is correct following the MSM's standards for Zimmerman.
I wouldn't want to be the Republican candidate that refers to Obama as a "White Negro"!
Re: Another example of what we are up against
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 7:19 pm
by Katygunnut
sjfcontrol wrote:Tamie wrote:Katygunnut wrote:Texbow wrote:Do we have white Hispanics, red Hispanics, yellow Hispanics? Maybe I have missed something, is he half Hispanic and half white?
By the same standard, I think our President is officially a "White African", or "White Negro" since one parent is white and the other is black.
Or maybe he is a "Black Caucasian". After all, in the Martin case the Dad's race (white) is used before the Mom's race (hispanic). This is all so confusing! Maybe the nice folks at MSNBC can clarify this latest term for the PC labeling of race.
For full disclosure, my dad is of Spanish heritage, but he was born in the US (his father immigrated from Spain); and my Mom is Irish. I think that makes me a "Hispanic Irish" man, or maybe I can use the more generic "white" term for my Irish heritage, which would make me a "Hispanic White" man. I guess I am the opposite of Mr Zimmerman, kind of.
White Negro is correct following the MSM's standards for Zimmerman.
I wouldn't want to be the Republican candidate that refers to Obama as a "White Negro"!
That would clearly be racist if mentioned by a Republican, but would be OK for someone like Nancy Pelosi.
It is well known that any mention of race is only acceptable if it used to advance a liberal agenda. Otherwise any such reference should be classified as a racist statement.