Proposed Changes to NFA Form Requirements

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply
User avatar

Topic author
hpcatx
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 511
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2011 11:21 am
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana

Proposed Changes to NFA Form Requirements

#1

Post by hpcatx »

Recently there's been posts regarding firearm trusts, NFA requirements, and potential restrictions on transfers. Figured this was germane to those discussions.
Article on the website thefirearmblog.com wrote:
  • Eliminate the requirement of a law enforcement official to sign your forms
  • Require each responsible person of a corporation, trust or legal entity to complete a specified form 1 or 4
  • Require each member of a trust to complete and to submit photographs and fingerprints with forms
  • Require that a copy of all forms be forwarded to the chief law enforcement officer of the locality in which the maker or transferee is located
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2013 ... m-changes/

The original story also contains a link to view the proposed rule change. The article was published 21 hours ago; the proposed rule change is dated 07/00/2013, although I'm not exactly sure what that means.
"We have four boxes with which to defend our freedom: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box." - L. McDonald
User avatar

Jumping Frog
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5488
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:13 am
Location: Klein, TX (Houston NW suburb)

Re: Proposed Changes to NFA Form Requirements

#2

Post by Jumping Frog »

This is a horrible idea, yet another aspect of the Obamination.

The 07/00/2013 date means they intend to file the NPRM next July. Once we fight the current battle in front of us, we will also need to get our representatives and the NRA engaged in fighting this.
-Just call me Bob . . . Texas Firearms Coalition, NRA Life member, TSRA Life member, and OFCC Patron member

This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ

recaffeination

Re: Proposed Changes to NFA Form Requirements

#3

Post by recaffeination »

Where did this rumor originate? I question both it's validity and the rumor monger's legal education. For example, a LLC has members but trusts do not have members.
User avatar

Topic author
hpcatx
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 511
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2011 11:21 am
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana

Re: Proposed Changes to NFA Form Requirements

#4

Post by hpcatx »

recaffeination wrote:Where did this rumor originate? I question both it's validity and the rumor monger's legal education. For example, a LLC has members but trusts do not have members.
Checkout the first post for the link. The proposed change is on the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs', a section of the executive branch, website. That is the language in the abstract, #2, says "each responsible person of a corporation, trust or legal entity..." The blog post rephrases that as two separate bullet points and states "each member of a trust..."
"We have four boxes with which to defend our freedom: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box." - L. McDonald
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”