CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply
User avatar

baldeagle
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
Location: Richardson, TX

Re: CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired

#1

Post by baldeagle »

Done and done.
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
Top
User avatar

Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 17787
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:
Contact Charles L. Cotton

Re: CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired

#2

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

I don't know what the civil law is there, but if this were in Texas and if she had a contract with Fox, I'd be filing a suit for tortuous interference with contractual relationship. Get an injunction, attorney fees and perhaps other remedies.

Chas.
Top
User avatar

VMI77
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

Re: CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired

#3

Post by VMI77 »

More of that famous liberal "tolerance" on display.

Signed.
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
Top
User avatar

Commander Cody
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 840
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:25 am
Location: Texas City/Trinity

Re: CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired

#4

Post by Commander Cody »

signed
"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." Thomas Jefferson USMC 1967-1970 101st. Underwater Mess Kit Repair Battalion - Spoon Platoon.
Top

Cedar Park Dad
Banned
Posts in topic: 10
Posts: 2064
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 7:19 am
Location: Cedar Park Texas

Re: CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired

#5

Post by Cedar Park Dad »

Charles L. Cotton wrote:I don't know what the civil law is there, but if this were in Texas and if she had a contract with Fox, I'd be filing a suit for tortuous interference with contractual relationship. Get an injunction, attorney fees and perhaps other remedies.

Chas.
How? They are using free speech. I don't agree with it, but thats kind of the point of the Big 2A, to protect the rights of others to say what we don't like and admit how stupid they are. ;-)
Top
User avatar

Jumping Frog
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5488
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:13 am
Location: Klein, TX (Houston NW suburb)

Re: CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired

#6

Post by Jumping Frog »

Cedar Park Dad wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:I don't know what the civil law is there, but if this were in Texas and if she had a contract with Fox, I'd be filing a suit for tortuous interference with contractual relationship. Get an injunction, attorney fees and perhaps other remedies.

Chas.
How? They are using free speech. I don't agree with it, but thats kind of the point of the Big 2A, to protect the rights of others to say what we don't like and admit how stupid they are. ;-)
Tortious interference is attempting to interfere in the contractual relationship existing between two other parties.

Sure, they have free speech, but that neither justifies falsely yelling fire in a movie theater nor interfering in someone's contract.
-Just call me Bob . . . Texas Firearms Coalition, NRA Life member, TSRA Life member, and OFCC Patron member

This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ
Top
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 26796
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:
Contact The Annoyed Man

Re: CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired

#7

Post by The Annoyed Man »

I signed, and paid to support it.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
Top

Dave09
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 61
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2014 12:35 am

Re: CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired

#8

Post by Dave09 »

signed
Top
User avatar

japacejr
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:14 pm
Location: McKinney, TX

Re: CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired

#9

Post by japacejr »

Signed.
12/17/2011: CHL Received
Top
User avatar

jmra
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired

#10

Post by jmra »

Signed. #150 I believe.
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
Top
User avatar

txglock21
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 772
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 11:39 am
Location: Garland, TX.

Re: CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired

#11

Post by txglock21 »

Signed...#180.
"Laugh about everything or cry about nothing."
NRA Life Member & TSRA Member/ Former USAF
Top

mr1337
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1201
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:17 pm
Location: Austin

Re: CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired

#12

Post by mr1337 »

Signed
Keep calm and carry.

Licensing (n.) - When government takes away your right to do something and sells it back to you.
Top

Cedar Park Dad
Banned
Posts in topic: 10
Posts: 2064
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 7:19 am
Location: Cedar Park Texas

Re: CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired

#13

Post by Cedar Park Dad »

Jumping Frog wrote:
Cedar Park Dad wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:I don't know what the civil law is there, but if this were in Texas and if she had a contract with Fox, I'd be filing a suit for tortuous interference with contractual relationship. Get an injunction, attorney fees and perhaps other remedies.

Chas.
How? They are using free speech. I don't agree with it, but thats kind of the point of the Big 2A, to protect the rights of others to say what we don't like and admit how stupid they are. ;-)
Tortious interference is attempting to interfere in the contractual relationship existing between two other parties.

Sure, they have free speech, but that neither justifies falsely yelling fire in a movie theater nor interfering in someone's contract.
Which they are doing neither. Good luck with making that claim in court.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”