And, of course, if we ban bump stocks there will never be another mass killing, especially in a place like Oklahoma City.parabelum wrote:Wow, what a revolutionary and original idea. Let's ban "bump stocks". Yea, that'll work!
Idiot politician.
John Cornyn of Texas is focused on bump-stocks
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:01 pm
- Location: Northern DFW
Re: John Cornyn of Texas is focused on bump-stocks
6/23-8/13/10 -51 days to plastic
Dum Spiro, Spero
Dum Spiro, Spero
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 1536
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 10:20 am
- Location: East Texas
Re: John Cornyn of Texas is focused on bump-stocks
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10 ... oting.html
“The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semi-automatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations,” the NRA said in a written statement.
Do what you say you're gonna do.
Re: John Cornyn of Texas is focused on bump-stocks
Anybody else baffled by the NRA's call for additional regulations on bump fire stocks?
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 799
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:52 am
- Location: San Antonio
Re: John Cornyn of Texas is focused on bump-stocks
Extremely baffled especially when they were sending me emails pushing to have stuff stripped off the NFA just a little bit ago. Apparently only some limits are unconstitutional.TVGuy wrote:Anybody else baffled by the NRA's call for additional regulations on bump fire stocks?
EDC: Sig Sauer P320SC / P238
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 6
- Posts: 5052
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
- Location: DFW Area, TX
Re: John Cornyn of Texas is focused on bump-stocks
But hey we got FOPA in 1986... ATF has previously classified a rubber band and paperclip as a full auto conversion kit and washers as firearm silencers, so let's let 'em at plastic handles with springs aka bump fire stocks. Good move NRA...TVGuy wrote:Anybody else baffled by the NRA's call for additional regulations on bump fire stocks?
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"
Re: John Cornyn of Texas is focused on bump-stocks
I think the NRA is trying to get something (National Conceal Carry Reciprocity) in return for agreeing to regulations on bump stocks. We can, of course, debate whether that is the right course to take.TVGuy wrote:Anybody else baffled by the NRA's call for additional regulations on bump fire stocks?
Please know and follow the rules of firearms safety.
Re: John Cornyn of Texas is focused on bump-stocks
For the record, before it goes there on this board, I'm not bashing the NRA. I'm simply curious why in the world they would give up this ground so quickly. I'm actually confused.
Re: John Cornyn of Texas is focused on bump-stocks
Makes sense, but we have a majority in both houses of Congress and the White House. Additionally, a slight majority on SCOTUS if needed. Why are we giving up any ground? Shouldn't have to.dlh wrote:I think the NRA is trying to get something (National Conceal Carry Reciprocity) in return for agreeing to regulations on bump stocks. We can, of course, debate whether that is the right course to take.TVGuy wrote:Anybody else baffled by the NRA's call for additional regulations on bump fire stocks?
-
- Site Admin
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 17787
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
- Location: Friendswood, TX
- Contact:
Re: John Cornyn of Texas is focused on bump-stocks
Is there no one who can guess why his statement was made at this time?
Chas.
Chas.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 799
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:52 am
- Location: San Antonio
Re: John Cornyn of Texas is focused on bump-stocks
He's the Senate majority whip. It's not like we can just safely assume he's playing possum especially when many others around him are thinking of banning gun parts.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Is there no one who can guess why his statement was made at this time?
Chas.
EDC: Sig Sauer P320SC / P238
Re: John Cornyn of Texas is focused on bump-stocks
Not baffled at all. It is a smart move from the NRA to reduce the liberals momentum.TVGuy wrote:Anybody else baffled by the NRA's call for additional regulations on bump fire stocks?
P.S.: Why would a normal person want a device to increase firing rate anyway? Using a loopholes is what Obama preferred to do, isn't it? My $.02 is that one wanting a full auto should man up and get it using the legal way with all the implied paperwork and taxes.
I scarified political correctness to preserve honesty ︻╦̵̵͇̿̿̿̿══╤─
Re: John Cornyn of Texas is focused on bump-stocks
I don't own any bump stocks, but regulating them makes no sense. A belt loop or a rubber band can do the same thing.bmwrdr wrote:
P.S.: Why would a normal person want a device to increase firing rate anyway? Using a loopholes is what Obama preferred to do, isn't it? My $.02 is that one wanting a full auto should man up and get it using the legal way with all the implied paperwork and taxes.
By the way..."man up"...it's not paperwork or a $200 tax that keep most people that want a full auto from purchasing one. It's the price tag. Go look at the price for a full auto HK MP5...try north of $25,000.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 799
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:52 am
- Location: San Antonio
Re: John Cornyn of Texas is focused on bump-stocks
Nothing says being a man like buying a pre-ban M16 lower receiver for $20,000, waiting a year for approval and tossing the government $200 extra.bmwrdr wrote:Not baffled at all. It is a smart move from the NRA to reduce the liberals momentum.TVGuy wrote:Anybody else baffled by the NRA's call for additional regulations on bump fire stocks?
P.S.: Why would a normal person want a device to increase firing rate anyway? Using a loopholes is what Obama preferred to do, isn't it? My $.02 is that one wanting a full auto should man up and get it using the legal way with all the implied paperwork and taxes.
So weird how quickly the tables have turned.
EDC: Sig Sauer P320SC / P238
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 6
- Posts: 5052
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
- Location: DFW Area, TX
Re: John Cornyn of Texas is focused on bump-stocks
I want a device to simulate full auto, because I don't have the $25,000 to buy a pre-86 registered M-16. I bought two legal full autos 15 years ago, but as designed the Hughes amendment to the FOPA of 1986 has reduced the supply to the point where only a rich retired real estate investor could afford a full-auto.bmwrdr wrote:Not baffled at all. It is a smart move from the NRA to reduce the liberals momentum.TVGuy wrote:Anybody else baffled by the NRA's call for additional regulations on bump fire stocks?
P.S.: Why would a normal person want a device to increase firing rate anyway? Using a loopholes is what Obama preferred to do, isn't it? My $.02 is that one wanting a full auto should man up and get it using the legal way with all the implied paperwork and taxes.
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 8
- Posts: 7863
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
- Location: Richmond, Texas
Re: John Cornyn of Texas is focused on bump-stocks
So someone who wants to spend their own resources the way they decide and do what they have the freedom to do is not normal?bmwrdr wrote:Not baffled at all. It is a smart move from the NRA to reduce the liberals momentum.TVGuy wrote:Anybody else baffled by the NRA's call for additional regulations on bump fire stocks?
P.S.: Why would a normal person want a device to increase firing rate anyway? Using a loopholes is what Obama preferred to do, isn't it? My $.02 is that one wanting a full auto should man up and get it using the legal way with all the implied paperwork and taxes.
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh
"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand