Feinstein vs Kavanaugh

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: Charles L. Cotton, carlson1

User avatar

Topic author
AndyC
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 10016
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 12:34 pm
Location: Richardson, TX

Feinstein vs Kavanaugh

#1

Post by AndyC » Thu Sep 06, 2018 10:06 am

Remember Kitty Genovese

Image

Amateurs skip safety-checks - pros don't.
Preferred Travel Agent - 72 Virgins Dating Club
There's nothing quite like the offer of 230 grains to a man's chest to remind him of his manners

User avatar

Beiruty
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 8782
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 9:22 pm
Location: Allen, Texas

Re: Feinstein vs Kavanaugh

#2

Post by Beiruty » Thu Sep 06, 2018 10:18 am

As if she got punched between her eyes.
Beiruty,
United we stand, dispersed we falter
2014: NRA Endowment lifetime member


Richbirdhunter
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1088
Joined: Mon May 18, 2015 7:45 pm
Location: DFW Denton County

Re: Feinstein vs Kavanaugh

#3

Post by Richbirdhunter » Thu Sep 06, 2018 11:14 am

I want to know if Booker is going to be in trouble for releasing classified documents
Disclaimer: Anything I state can not be applied to 100% of all situations. Sometimes it's ok to speak in general terms.

User avatar

PriestTheRunner
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 364
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 5:33 pm

Re: Feinstein vs Kavanaugh

#4

Post by PriestTheRunner » Thu Sep 06, 2018 11:20 am

"Common Use doesn't mean ownership, it means use"... Umm... Wut?

Lol. If 30 million Americans own a certain firearm (I know its actually 3x or more higher) and only use it once a year, how is that not 30 million 'uses' and fitting of the term 'common use'. Does she really think that no one gets their firearms out of the safe?

Thats a new level of redefinition right there.


philip964
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 6950
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:30 pm

Re: Feinstein vs Kavanaugh

#5

Post by philip964 » Thu Sep 06, 2018 12:02 pm

Feinstein in trouble with her base for apologizing for the disruption yesterday.


flechero
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 2207
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 5:04 pm
Location: Central Texas

Re: Feinstein vs Kavanaugh

#6

Post by flechero » Thu Sep 06, 2018 12:03 pm

PriestTheRunner wrote:
Thu Sep 06, 2018 11:20 am
"Common Use doesn't mean ownership, it means use"... Umm... Wut?
I wish he would have smiled and said: "Yes Senator, common in ownership and use. I go to the range weekly and your so called assault rifles are the most common rifles seen at the range... I think that qualifies as common." :lol:

User avatar

J.R.@A&M
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 725
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 12:41 pm

Re: Feinstein vs Kavanaugh

#7

Post by J.R.@A&M » Thu Sep 06, 2018 1:29 pm

flechero wrote:
Thu Sep 06, 2018 12:03 pm
PriestTheRunner wrote:
Thu Sep 06, 2018 11:20 am
"Common Use doesn't mean ownership, it means use"... Umm... Wut?
I wish he would have smiled and said: "Yes Senator, common in ownership and use. I go to the range weekly and your so called assault rifles are the most common rifles seen at the range... I think that qualifies as common." :lol:
I am presently using my handgun, quietly holstered as it is, in the same manner that I am using my other insurance policies. I am using them, without collecting on them, in order to sleep at night
“[T]he liberties of the American people [are] dependent upon the ballot-box, the jury-box, and the cartridge-box; that without these no class of people could live and flourish in this country.” Life and Times of Frederick Douglass

User avatar

Jusme
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 4563
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 4:23 pm
Location: Johnson County, Texas

Re: Feinstein vs Kavanaugh

#8

Post by Jusme » Thu Sep 06, 2018 1:47 pm

I am just wondering, where these "hundreds" of school shootings, where "assault" rifles were used, occurred? Did I miss all of the news reports? I would challenge Feinstein, to produce a list of these hundreds, of cases, so that we can fully appreciate the magnitude, of this atrocity. :shock:
Take away the Second first, and the First is gone in a second :rules: :patriot:

User avatar

chamberc
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 524
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:45 pm
Location: Las Colinas

Re: Feinstein vs Kavanaugh

#9

Post by chamberc » Thu Sep 06, 2018 2:07 pm

Richbirdhunter wrote:
Thu Sep 06, 2018 11:14 am
I want to know if Booker is going to be in trouble for releasing classified documents
Booker didn’t actually break any rules. The Republicans on the Judiciary Committee worked with the George W. Bush library and the Justice Department overnight to clear the emails. The restrictions were waived early Thursday morning.
NRA Life Member
TSRA Life Member
LTC since 2000
http://www.texas3006.com

User avatar

Lynyrd
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1185
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 10:20 am
Location: East Texas

Re: Feinstein vs Kavanaugh

#10

Post by Lynyrd » Thu Sep 06, 2018 2:08 pm

She is an embarrassment to the Senate and the country.
Do what you say you're gonna do.

User avatar

Maxwell
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 737
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2011 2:05 pm

Re: Feinstein vs Kavanaugh

#11

Post by Maxwell » Thu Sep 06, 2018 2:20 pm

chamberc wrote:
Thu Sep 06, 2018 2:07 pm
Richbirdhunter wrote:
Thu Sep 06, 2018 11:14 am
I want to know if Booker is going to be in trouble for releasing classified documents
Booker didn’t actually break any rules. The Republicans on the Judiciary Committee worked with the George W. Bush library and the Justice Department overnight to clear the emails. The restrictions were waived early Thursday morning.
AS he probably expected, so he was simply grandstanding and being as disruptive as possible. (Any additional comments would be censored...)
:banghead:
I never let schooling interfere with my education. Mark Twain

User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 23995
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Feinstein vs Kavanaugh

#12

Post by The Annoyed Man » Thu Sep 06, 2018 2:36 pm

Richbirdhunter wrote:
Thu Sep 06, 2018 11:14 am
I want to know if Booker is going to be in trouble for releasing classified documents
While I think that what Booker did was despicable, those weren’t “classified” documents; they were “confidential” committee documents. There is a distinction. Grassley has already absolved Booker of any rule breaking ..... and there are still people who deny the existence of a “deep state”.

The up side to this incident is that Booker has set another precedent that democrats will come to regret. First, former majority leader Harry Reid did away with a rule preventing a simple majority vote to confirm. The GOP holds 51 seats in the senate. That didn’t used to be enough to confirm a SCOTUS justice. Thanks to Reid, it is now enough. So Kavanaugh WILL be confirmed. Now that Booker has set a new precedent for breaking committee confidentiality, republicans are free to do it any time they want to democrats ..... if they have the courage.

It used to be that democrats could break the rules to their advantage, but count on republicans NOT to break those rules....because conservatives believe rules to be useful, and at heart, all democrats are anarchists. But it is now time to fight fire with fire. Going forward, EVERY republican serving on a committee should release any and all confidential committee documents which are found to be inconvenient to democrats. Every. Time. And if democrats protest, republicans should simply smile, and cite the “Booker Precendent”.
Give me Liberty, or I'll get up and get it myself.—Hookalakah Meshobbab
I don't carry because of the odds, I carry because of the stakes.—The Annoyed Boy

User avatar

chamberc
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 524
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:45 pm
Location: Las Colinas

Re: Feinstein vs Kavanaugh

#13

Post by chamberc » Thu Sep 06, 2018 2:51 pm

The Annoyed Man wrote:
Thu Sep 06, 2018 2:36 pm
Richbirdhunter wrote:
Thu Sep 06, 2018 11:14 am
I want to know if Booker is going to be in trouble for releasing classified documents
While I think that what Booker did was despicable, those weren’t “classified” documents; they were “confidential” committee documents. There is a distinction. Grassley has already absolved Booker of any rule breaking ..... and there are still people who deny the existence of a “deep state”.

The up side to this incident is that Booker has set another precedent that democrats will come to regret. First, former majority leader Harry Reid did away with a rule preventing a simple majority vote to confirm. The GOP holds 51 seats in the senate. That didn’t used to be enough to confirm a SCOTUS justice. Thanks to Reid, it is now enough. So Kavanaugh WILL be confirmed. Now that Booker has set a new precedent for breaking committee confidentiality, republicans are free to do it any time they want to democrats ..... if they have the courage.

It used to be that democrats could break the rules to their advantage, but count on republicans NOT to break those rules....because conservatives believe rules to be useful, and at heart, all democrats are anarchists. But it is now time to fight fire with fire. Going forward, EVERY republican serving on a committee should release any and all confidential committee documents which are found to be inconvenient to democrats. Every. Time. And if democrats protest, republicans should simply smile, and cite the “Booker Precendent”.
No rules were broken. The Republicans and the Bush Library had the documents cleared for release early this morning.
NRA Life Member
TSRA Life Member
LTC since 2000
http://www.texas3006.com

User avatar

RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 7404
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: Feinstein vs Kavanaugh

#14

Post by RoyGBiv » Thu Sep 06, 2018 3:26 pm

Jusme wrote:
Thu Sep 06, 2018 1:47 pm
I am just wondering, where these "hundreds" of school shootings, where "assault" rifles were used, occurred? Did I miss all of the news reports? I would challenge Feinstein, to produce a list of these hundreds, of cases, so that we can fully appreciate the magnitude, of this atrocity. :shock:
She's lying. Already completely debunked... By NPR!

From Reason.com.... Dianne Feinstein Wants Brett Kavanaugh to 'Reconcile' His Second Amendment Reasoning With 'Hundreds of School Shootings' That Never Happened

.

And from NPR:
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Image
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek

User avatar

Jusme
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 4563
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 4:23 pm
Location: Johnson County, Texas

Re: Feinstein vs Kavanaugh

#15

Post by Jusme » Thu Sep 06, 2018 4:44 pm

RoyGBiv wrote:
Thu Sep 06, 2018 3:26 pm
Jusme wrote:
Thu Sep 06, 2018 1:47 pm
I am just wondering, where these "hundreds" of school shootings, where "assault" rifles were used, occurred? Did I miss all of the news reports? I would challenge Feinstein, to produce a list of these hundreds, of cases, so that we can fully appreciate the magnitude, of this atrocity. :shock:
She's lying. Already completely debunked... By NPR!

From Reason.com.... Dianne Feinstein Wants Brett Kavanaugh to 'Reconcile' His Second Amendment Reasoning With 'Hundreds of School Shootings' That Never Happened

.

And from NPR:


Yeah, it's different if you are testifying, and defending your opinions, at that point you are expected to tell the truth, in fact you swear an oath to do just that. I would be livid, if the person asking the questions, told such a blatant lie. But then again, it's the left, they aren't held to the same standards as everyone else. :rules:
Take away the Second first, and the First is gone in a second :rules: :patriot:

Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”