lrb111 wrote:I don't see that in the story.NcongruNt wrote:I find it bizarre that he had an AR-15.
Greybeard wrote: And Channel 5 news at 10:00 last night indicated BG used AR-15 ...
Moderator: carlson1
Thanks, I had gone straight to the story...NcongruNt wrote:lrb111 wrote:I don't see that in the story.NcongruNt wrote:I find it bizarre that he had an AR-15.Greybeard wrote: And Channel 5 news at 10:00 last night indicated BG used AR-15 ...
As a firefighter you should know that Fire and EMS won't go into an active shooting situation and retrieve an injured person. The officers had no choice but to move him.Liberty wrote: I also received trauma scene training (certified fire fighter) and most cops I worked with had less training than I. I knew I was a amateur when compared to the pros(real paramedics). Its all relative
I am, and this decision to move and transport the wounded officer out of a firefight situation was the correct call...Not to say Fire/EMS wouldn't get in there and take care of him, it was the correct call to make, and I would support it...KRM45 wrote:As a firefighter you should know that Fire and EMS won't go into an active shooting situation and retrieve an injured person. The officers had no choice but to move him.
That's what I thought at first, but we don't know how the position of the vehicles changed once shooting started. At least one police vehicle left the scene.carlson1 wrote: From what I seen of the video and from my experience the officers had no choice but to exit their patrol car quickly - they were nose to nose to the suspect. It seemed to me that the "crash" was what changed the felony stop.
TX I am sure you have visited this sight before, but the way it reads it Cpl. Nix was shot and then the suspect drove another mile and wrecked out.txinvestigator wrote:That's what I thought at first, but we don't know how the position of the vehicles changed once shooting started. At least one police vehicle left the scene.carlson1 wrote: From what I seen of the video and from my experience the officers had no choice but to exit their patrol car quickly - they were nose to nose to the suspect. It seemed to me that the "crash" was what changed the felony stop.
Generally the whole idea of calling life flight is not to get the patient to a hospital faster, but to get the patient to a trauma center in a reasonable time.carlson1 wrote:As an LEO I called Life Flight twice. I do know that you will not get Life Flight faster than you can an ambulance unless you are many miles away from a hospital. It is easier for an ambulance to travel 10 miles than Life Flight 10 miles.Liberty wrote: I do know that you cant' tell how long Life flight will take until you call them.
Liberty wrote:Generally the whole idea of calling life flight is not to get the patient to a hospital faster, but to get the patient to a trauma center in a reasonable time.carlson1 wrote:As an LEO I called Life Flight twice. I do know that you will not get Life Flight faster than you can an ambulance unless you are many miles away from a hospital. It is easier for an ambulance to travel 10 miles than Life Flight 10 miles.Liberty wrote: I do know that you cant' tell how long Life flight will take until you call them.
The initial report of this was that an ambulance couldn't get there because of the all the traffic. That is why I suggested Life flite Seems strange that the police were able to get there and out again without problems. Sounds like the Traffic excuse was just that. As I have said before I am not familiar with the area. but just because a hospital is there doesn't mean that you will get qualified care there. most hospitals are not equiped to handle trauma cases. I've worked accidents literally across the street from a hospital where life flight was called to fly to a hospital 50 miles away.. The reasoning being that the specialist needed will be on duty. Good correct medical care is typically more important than fast medical care.
There is an assumption here that the sooner the patient gets to the hospital the better off he is.. What we should be thinking is that the sooner the patient gets proper medical help the be better of the patient will be. In this case Medical help didn't start until the patient got to the hospital. While I don't mean to be second guessing this officers treatment I'm concerned from what I read here that sometimes calls are made because in the name of speed instead of good medical practice.
I just realized though, that I may be making assumptions on the quality of the Dallas EMTs that isn't true.. My assumption is that the EMTs are highly qualified. They typically are in most of the departments I'm familiar with. Things may be different in Dallas and the police dept is probably very aware of their limitations. The Ambulance/EMT service may just be glorified bus drivers. In that case all bets are off.
Its becoming obvious that we are all speculating some. while some are under assumption that the patient was at the scene of the stand off and firefight. I think he was a mile away, maybe just an assumption. While others might think its bad form to critique such things. I only hope to cause thought if this happens to anyone here. I admitedly don't have the facts.. I don't know how the patient was doing, what the scene was like, or what the ETA for professional help was. What I do know is that rushing a trauma patient to a hospital in a passenger car rather than waiting for the professionals is generally a bad idea. Whether it is in this specific case or not, I don't know. I don't have all the all the facts. but I do know it is at least a possibilty that the officer made things worse by taking on the responsibility of transporting his buddy. However I also suspect that you are right, that in reality it probably didn't matter.carlson1 wrote:
I would suggest that Parkland in Dallas IS THE HOSPITAL for trauma. I would also suggest that the EMT's are very qualified. The decison made to transport would have been correct (IMO) and I doubt the transport made a life and death difference. You would have to take a vote from other LEO or retired LEO, but I am voting for my partner to get me there in THIS SITUATION AND LOCATION.
Liberty wrote:Its becoming obvious that we are all speculating some. while some are under assumption that the patient was at the scene of the stand off and firefight. I think he was a mile away, maybe just an assumption. While others might think its bad form to critique such things. I only hope to cause thought if this happens to anyone here. I admitedly don't have the facts.. I don't know how the patient was doing, what the scene was like, or what the ETA for professional help was. What I do know is that rushing a trauma patient to a hospital in a passenger car rather than waiting for the professionals is generally a bad idea. Whether it is in this specific case or not, I don't know. I don't have all the all the facts. but I do know it is at least a possibilty that the officer made things worse by taking on the responsibility of transporting his buddy. However I also suspect that you are right, that in reality it probably didn't matter.carlson1 wrote:
I would suggest that Parkland in Dallas IS THE HOSPITAL for trauma. I would also suggest that the EMT's are very qualified. The decison made to transport would have been correct (IMO) and I doubt the transport made a life and death difference. You would have to take a vote from other LEO or retired LEO, but I am voting for my partner to get me there in THIS SITUATION AND LOCATION.