Legal question

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

War Beagle
Junior Member
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2013 9:47 am

Legal question

Post by War Beagle »

I know about the properly formatted 30.06 signs, public meetings and courts restricts on CC. However, do other governmental entities, such as cities, have the right to pass regulations (such as ordinances) related to CC, or is that a right that is solely exercised by the Legislature?
User avatar
gdanaher
Banned
Posts: 670
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 8:38 am
Location: EM12

Re: Legal question

Post by gdanaher »

IANAL, but a local government entity cannot enact laws that supersede state or federal law. Watcha' have in mind?
User avatar
Purplehood
Senior Member
Posts: 4638
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:35 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Legal question

Post by Purplehood »

Local law cannot supersede State law in regards to CHL.
Life NRA
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
War Beagle
Junior Member
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2013 9:47 am

Re: Legal question

Post by War Beagle »

That's what I thought. I was just curious as to whether or not a city or county could further regulate guns or conceal carry. I didn't think so but I knew someone here would be able to confirm.
RottenApple
Senior Member
Posts: 1774
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 3:19 pm

Re: Legal question

Post by RottenApple »

Texas has preemption that prevents counties, municipalities, etc from regulating firearms.
User avatar
RAM4171
Senior Member
Posts: 363
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 9:03 am
Location: On a dead end dirt road in the deep dark woods of East TEXAS

Re: Legal question

Post by RAM4171 »

Here you go.
http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/InternetFo ... CHL-16.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Μολὼν λαβέ
Jesus was not politically correct, therefore I refuse to be
To my mind it is wholly irresponsible to go into the world incapable of preventing violence, injury, crime, and death. How feeble is the mindset to accept defenselessness. How unnatural. How cheap. How cowardly. How pathetic-TN
User avatar
RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts: 9602
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: Legal question

Post by RoyGBiv »

War Beagle wrote:public meetings
Where is this restriction in current law?
I don't find it in CHL-16, unless the Public Meeting is on school "Premises" (as defined in 46.035) or in a building that also houses a Court.

Did I miss something in 46.03?
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek
User avatar
gdanaher
Banned
Posts: 670
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 8:38 am
Location: EM12

Re: Legal question

Post by gdanaher »

What would the masses suggest in the case of the Austin Convention Center? In another thread someone has posted the house rules which note city ordinances prohibiting cc in the convention center. Line up a good attorney in Austin and have him wait for your call? Someone in the attorney general's office should be out checking on this sort of thing.
JP171
Banned
Posts: 1406
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:47 am
Location: San Leon Texas

Re: Legal question

Post by JP171 »

RoyGBiv wrote:
War Beagle wrote:public meetings
Where is this restriction in current law?
I don't find it in CHL-16, unless the Public Meeting is on school "Premises" (as defined in 46.035) or in a building that also houses a Court.

Did I miss something in 46.03?

I think he is thinking of the posting of governmental meetings where the law allows it to be posted 30:06
User avatar
RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts: 9602
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: Legal question

Post by RoyGBiv »

JP171 wrote:
RoyGBiv wrote:
War Beagle wrote:public meetings
Where is this restriction in current law?
I don't find it in CHL-16, unless the Public Meeting is on school "Premises" (as defined in 46.035) or in a building that also houses a Court.

Did I miss something in 46.03?

I think he is thinking of the posting of governmental meetings where the law allows it to be posted 30:06
Can anyone point me to the relevant code section please? Thanks.
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek
User avatar
RX8er
Senior Member
Posts: 1269
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 10:36 pm
Location: Northeast Fort Worth

Re: Legal question

Post by RX8er »

RoyGBiv wrote:
JP171 wrote:
RoyGBiv wrote:
War Beagle wrote:public meetings
Where is this restriction in current law?
I don't find it in CHL-16, unless the Public Meeting is on school "Premises" (as defined in 46.035) or in a building that also houses a Court.

Did I miss something in 46.03?

I think he is thinking of the posting of governmental meetings where the law allows it to be posted 30:06
Can anyone point me to the relevant code section please? Thanks.
I think It's covered under 46.035. Is this what you are after?
PC §46.035. UNLAWFUL CARRYING OF HANDGUN BY LICENSE
HOLDER.
........
(c) A license holder commits an offense if the license holder
intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly carries a handgun under the
authority of Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, regardless
of whether the handgun is concealed, at any meeting of a g overnmental entity.
........
(i) Subsections (b)(4), (b)(5), (b)(6), and (c) do not apply if the actor
was not given effective notice under Section 30.06.
Final Shot offers Firearms / FFL Transfers / CHL Instruction. Please like our Facebook Page.
If guns kill people, do pens misspell words?
I like options: Sig Sauer | DPMS | Springfield Armory | Glock | Beretta
JP171
Banned
Posts: 1406
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:47 am
Location: San Leon Texas

Re: Legal question

Post by JP171 »

RoyGBiv wrote:
JP171 wrote:
RoyGBiv wrote:
War Beagle wrote:public meetings
Where is this restriction in current law?
I don't find it in CHL-16, unless the Public Meeting is on school "Premises" (as defined in 46.035) or in a building that also houses a Court.

Did I miss something in 46.03?

I think he is thinking of the posting of governmental meetings where the law allows it to be posted 30:06
Can anyone point me to the relevant code section please? Thanks.


46:035 section C

(c) A license holder commits an offense if the license holder intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly carries a handgun under the authority of Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, regardless of whether the handgun is concealed, at any meeting of a govern-mental entity


(i) Subsections (b)(4), (b)(5), (b)(6), and (c) do not apply if the actor was not given effective notice under Section 30.06.


ok beat me to it
User avatar
RX8er
Senior Member
Posts: 1269
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 10:36 pm
Location: Northeast Fort Worth

Re: Legal question

Post by RX8er »

JP171 wrote: ok beat me to it
:biggrinjester:
:cheers2:
Final Shot offers Firearms / FFL Transfers / CHL Instruction. Please like our Facebook Page.
If guns kill people, do pens misspell words?
I like options: Sig Sauer | DPMS | Springfield Armory | Glock | Beretta
War Beagle
Junior Member
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2013 9:47 am

Re: Legal question

Post by War Beagle »

JP171 wrote:
RoyGBiv wrote:
War Beagle wrote:public meetings
Where is this restriction in current law?
I don't find it in CHL-16, unless the Public Meeting is on school "Premises" (as defined in 46.035) or in a building that also houses a Court.

Did I miss something in 46.03?

I think he is thinking of the posting of governmental meetings where the law allows it to be posted 30:06
Right. My city has signs up on the city hall that are not 30.06 compliant, so I wouldn't be all that worried on that count. What is confusing is the fact that we do not have a separate court facility. It is attached to city hall, and the city council chamber also doubles as the court room. What could probably be legally argued is that when the city council is in session, the room is no longer technically a courtroom. However, I am not a lawyer nor is it important enough for me to risk arrest when there are already several armed officers present for each meeting. It was just something I was curious about.
User avatar
RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts: 9602
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: Legal question

Post by RoyGBiv »

RX8er wrote: I think It's covered under 46.035. Is this what you are after?
PC §46.035. UNLAWFUL CARRYING OF HANDGUN BY LICENSE HOLDER.
........
(c) A license holder commits an offense if the license holder
intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly carries a handgun under the
authority of Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, regardless
of whether the handgun is concealed, at any meeting of a g overnmental entity.
........
(i) Subsections (b)(4), (b)(5), (b)(6), and (c) do not apply if the actor
was not given effective notice under Section 30.06.
Thanks!
I read right past it several times and couldn't find it.
:tiphat:
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”