Re: Buffalo Wild Wings Improper Signage
Posted: Thu May 27, 2010 7:34 am
Hmm.. can I guess which 2 with 4 guesses?Bayllor wrote:I obeyed two out of three.
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://www.texaschlforum.com/
Hmm.. can I guess which 2 with 4 guesses?Bayllor wrote:I obeyed two out of three.
Hmm.. can I guess which 2 with 4 guesses?
Sorry, you already know my opinion of that.Embalmo wrote:Please-No signage missionaries. It's our responsibility to follow the law and it is their responsibility to follow the law. The law specifies what is a compliant sign, so everything else is to be ignored.gigag04 wrote:I'd write the main office and ask what idiot said to put those signs up in a Texas store?Keep eating their wings unless they put up a compliant sign. For the record, Wings N More is much better, but BW3 has those wonderful Buffalo Chips.
![]()
Embalmo
Don't worry, I got the humor.gigag04 wrote:I'd write the main office and ask what idiot said to put those signs up in a Texas store?
LarryH wrote:![]()
The other option is not to go there, since the chain's management is obviously not in accord with our exercising our Second Amendment rights => they don't deserve any of my $$$.
Don't give up, I'm sure you'll eventually find a high enough ranking manager that'll care enough to correct that error; it's just a matter of perseverance. My problem, as you must know, is that I am a realist, not an idealist. Ideally they'll get the message and understand how important CHLs are to their business; then you'll receive a written letter of apology that includes coupons for free wings and chips. That ain't gonna' happen.jimlongley wrote:Sorry, you already know my opinion of that.Embalmo wrote:Please-No signage missionaries. It's our responsibility to follow the law and it is their responsibility to follow the law. The law specifies what is a compliant sign, so everything else is to be ignored.gigag04 wrote:I'd write the main office and ask what idiot said to put those signs up in a Texas store?Keep eating their wings unless they put up a compliant sign. For the record, Wings N More is much better, but BW3 has those wonderful Buffalo Chips.
![]()
Embalmo
I emailed and wrote them a long time ago about their sign, and have not received a reply. Since the improper signage is still in place and hasn't been supplanted by the "real thing" I can only assume that they know that the sign has no effect in Texas.
stevie_d_64 wrote: I would say that this particular franchise (where it is I have no idea) has made their intentions clear...
Their intentions, which we can only ascertain from their current signage, is that only those who are authorized to carry may carry; which is LEO and CHL. My advice to all is to go to the restaurant, continue to legally carry, and remember what the 'C' in CHL stands for.stevie_d_64 wrote:I think its great that more and more of us are paying attention, noticing these non-compliant signs, and getting the word out...
I would say that this particular franchise (where it is I have no idea) has made their intentions clear...A real shame, the food there is not that bad at these places...
If the signage is not something that is pushed at most locations, that tells us that the individual owner is a bit of a Ha Ha...(pardon the pun)
Yes, and with you too, and I have accomplished more with them.Embalmo wrote:Really-Have you ever tried to debate with an anti-gun zealot that those with criminal intent will ignore signage?
As is arguing with me.Embalmo wrote:It's pointless-
That is an assumption on your part, not necessarily based in reality.Embalmo wrote:You can email them with every possible logical argument and they will hold to their religion of Anti-gunism.
Neither indisputable, nor a fact, but we alrready established that in other threads, so, I'll just leave it at that.Embalmo wrote:The sad thing is that one person with a inbox and a mission can ruin it for all of us.
Cetrainly, you can argue that my words are just opinions, but and indisputable fact is that there in NOTHING to gain and access to everywhere to lose with a signage mission.
Embalmo
It always comes down to idealism versus realism.jimlongley wrote:Yes, and with you too, and I have accomplished more with them.Embalmo wrote:Really-Have you ever tried to debate with an anti-gun zealot that those with criminal intent will ignore signage?
As is arguing with me.Embalmo wrote:It's pointless-
That is an assumption on your part, not necessarily based in reality.Embalmo wrote:You can email them with every possible logical argument and they will hold to their religion of Anti-gunism.
Neither indisputable, nor a fact, but we alrready established that in other threads, so, I'll just leave it at that.Embalmo wrote:The sad thing is that one person with a inbox and a mission can ruin it for all of us.
Cetrainly, you can argue that my words are just opinions, but and indisputable fact is that there in NOTHING to gain and access to everywhere to lose with a signage mission.
Embalmo
Well, I guess that's one way to get rid of the sign.threoh8 wrote:Looks like someone in Lubbock took exception to something on the front door of BWW.