Page 2 of 2

Re: "5 ridiculous gun myths everyone believes"

Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:44 am
by Skiprr
Chemist45 wrote:olafpfj wrote:
James bond dropped dozens with one shot from his trusty ppk in. 380. Anyone who discounts that round knows nothing.
Not to pick nits, but Bond's PPK was a .32, not a .380.
Imagine how deadly he'd have been with a major caliber like .380!
And let's not forget that Commander Bond went through the first five books and five years of his career using a .25 ACP Beretta 418. Talk about the least effective choice that could be made.

Bond was issued the Walther PPK in 1958's Dr. No. Fleming admitted in an interview at some point that he had no expertise or interest in the technicalities of firearms.

Guess what books got me hooked on reading in the early 60s...

Re: "5 ridiculous gun myths everyone believes"

Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 9:00 am
by olafpfj
Skiprr wrote:
Chemist45 wrote:olafpfj wrote:
James bond dropped dozens with one shot from his trusty ppk in. 380. Anyone who discounts that round knows nothing.
Not to pick nits, but Bond's PPK was a .32, not a .380.
Imagine how deadly he'd have been with a major caliber like .380!
And let's not forget that Commander Bond went through the first five books and five years of his career using a .25 ACP Beretta 418. Talk about the least effective choice that could be made.

Bond was issued the Walther PPK in 1958's Dr. No. Fleming admitted in an interview at some point that he had no expertise or interest in the technicalities of firearms.

Guess what books got me hooked on reading in the early 60s...
DOH!!!.... :oops:

Maybe I should stop watching movies and read a book now and then.... :mrgreen:

Next you're all going to tell me that my carry .45 won't blow people back 15 feet...say it isn't so!!!! :eek6

Re: "5 ridiculous gun myths everyone believes"

Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 11:49 am
by MojoTexas
Also pointing out another nit...suppressed firearms CAN be made to be very quiet, assuming you're firing sub-sonic ammunition. The sonic crack is what's hard to muffle. One of the members of this fine forum posted some videos of him shooting some sub-sonic suppressed .22 LR out in West Texas, and on the video all you could hear was the action working.

So to Cracked's credit, yes, a suppressor isn't going to turn a high-powered firearm into a baby sneezing, but with the right ammunition and setup, it can be done.

Re: "5 ridiculous gun myths everyone believes"

Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 8:48 pm
by troglodyte
I love it when you hear the ominous sound of the hammer cocking......................on a glock. "rlol"

Re: "5 ridiculous gun myths everyone believes"

Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2011 8:50 am
by MojoTexas
Did you guys see the recent episode of Mythbusters where they took on the myth that you could spin a merry-go-round by shooting it, and you can shoot a gun out of reach of a bad guy? I just watched it on DVR last night, and thought it was pretty interesting.

Re: "5 ridiculous gun myths everyone believes"

Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 8:18 am
by webb3201
When discussing the changing times in movie firearms use, I have to point out one massive change that has occurred in the last decade. For years, we saw shooter firing dozens of rounds out of revolvers without ever reloading. This become the standard cliche in almost every movie featuring gun play. We never saw them reload. Fast forward to the 2000s and we see a total change. Shooters drop mags and reload about every 5th shot at this point. If you can sit through the last Die Hard movie, you will see Willis reload his semi at around every 3-5 shots for the whole movie.