TexasCHLforum.com

anygunanywhere wrote:

chasfm11 wrote:

particle wrote: That being said - I think the NRA commercial is apples & oranges. The U.S. doesn't negotiate with terrorists - what's the fastest way to test that statement....? Yes, the president's children most certainly need 24/7 armed security - not even a question in most people's mind. The difference is that protection of the president's children is in the interest of our country's national security.

Sorry but I see this differently. I don't wish harm on the President's daughters or any other kids for that matter. But our granddaughter has the right from her Creator for protection, too. Because she is too young yet to fully assume that roll for herself, the rest of us have to step in and help her. She cannot yet drive a car either so we take her places that she needs or wants to go in our car. That is the way that it is with kids.

This is not about whether the President and his family but about whether the President, Bloomberg and the rest of the Elites can deny the rest of us and especially our kids and grandkids protection. As far as I'm concerned, neither he nor any member of Congress should have anything that they choose to deny for me. I would love to see a Constitutional amendment to that affect.

Here is the rub.

I, me, one of the ones who despises the president and what he stands for, would never want anything to happen to his family by any evil that exists in this world. I would beyond a shodow of doubt defend his little girls and their mother if I was to witness an attempt by someone to do them harm. I would gladly go to slide lock in a heartbeat.

Now.

Do you actually think that they believe the same about me and mine?

Do you actually think that they believe that me and mine deserve the same protection that they receive? It is true that I do not have near the individuals who are undoubtedly plotting against me that they do. This point is also irrelevant.

No one human in this world is above another ort more deserving of treatment than another.

It says so in Our Declaration of independence and constitution.

Anygunanywhere

punkndisorderly wrote:It doesn't matter one way or another, at least to me. Either providing for security is a good idea and is worth it, or it isn't. The same goes for the rest of his proposals. Attack or defend on that. Even a evil moron can have a good idea, just as a genius can be wrong on an issue.