chasfm11 wrote:The Annoyed Man wrote:
(snip)
There is one subtle difference between Jase and Oprah though, and that is that Jase can shave off his beard and get a haircut anytime he wants to, and he'll be like his brother Al, whom nobody ever bothers because he looks "normal." But Oprah can't take off her blackness, and her politics, wealth, fame, social stature all have nothing to do with how she will be treated by people who don't know who she is. Some, because they are not racists, will treat her fairly and without any preconceived notions of her financial state; and others, because they are subconscious bigots, will do like the woman who inadvertently insulted her by trying to steer her to a less expensive item. Jase can walk in that hotel the next day, all cleaned up, and have a good laugh with the doorman who tossed him, and say "can you believe that I'm the same guy you threw out of here yesterday because of my beard, and today you're opening doors for me?" Oprah walks into that store the next day, and she's still the same black woman of whom some people are going to assume based on her color that she can't afford to buy whatever she wants to buy......and she'll be treated accordingly. There is no avenue of escape for her from that.
That's just my 2¢. YMMV.
OTOH, I've known a lot of white people who have been treated the same way in establishments that sell expensive merchandise. Good friends of ours went into look at a Steinway piano and the salesman ignored them because, based on the way that they were dressed, he didn't think that they could afford it. They could have easily paid cash. Try going into a fancy car showroom dressed down and I suspect that you will receive the same cold shoulder treatment.
I believe that some (many?) high end sales people, from houses to cars to jewelery financially profile potential customers. Oprah admitted that she didn't have any of the normal expensive trappings that would have given the clerk clues that she was into really expensive apparel. I suspect that had more to do with the rejection than the color of Oprah's skin. I can see the point of view of the salesperson. Why waste your time showing something to a casual person off the street who is just there to drool over the item? Just like politics, there is an Elitist snobbery that exists that crosses political parties and countries. The sales people simply work within that scheme.
Chas, I can see that point and do understand. Back in the 1950s, a friend of the family got ignored in the Rolls Royce showroom in San Francisco because he walked in wearing a t-shirt and paint stained chinos. Before walking out after waiting around for a half hour for someone to even adress him, he shoved the $35,000 he had wadded up in his pocket under the sales manager's nose and told him he was going across the street to buy a VW bug......which he did. Again though, the way he was treated in the Rolls dealership was due both to the prejudices of the salespeople, and his
choice in manner of dress (he was an artist who married into a vaaaaaaast fortune).
But my point about Oprah remains valid in that there are some people who are going to make assumptions about her ability to pay, no matter
how fancy she is dressed up, because of her blackness. There will be other people who will treat her that way because they don't think black people deserve or should have nice things. By no means are all salespeople like this, and we do live in a largely post-racial world (at least on the part of white people....I can't presume to speak for black people or brown people or blue people).....no matter what the race-baiters say. Even so, there
also still remain some bigoted people among us. There have
always been bigoted people among us, and there will
always be bigoted people among us, because bigotry is the product of either social ignorance, congenital stupidity, or mental illness—and social ignorance, congenital stupidity, and mental illness will always be with us. Like the saying goes, you can't fix stupid. Sometimes, stupidity fixes itself. We can only hope that when it does, it ends with the stupid person being convicted enough to say, "I was wrong; I'll never do that again."
Yes, Oprah might have been reading something into a situation that wasn't there; but she's 59 years old. I'm 60 years old, and I can remember a time when A) a person of her color being a $2.7
billionaire was unthinkable, and B)
LEO klansman treated peaceful black civil rights workers to firehoses, attack dogs, and truncheons. If I can remember it, surely she can too. Even though I was too young to
personally remember it (1955, I was 3 yrs old), Rosa Parks was arrested for her act of defiance during my lifetime. Even though the hard bigotry of Jim Crow is no longer with us (except in the form of gun-control), soft-bigotry still rears its ugly head occasionally in people of inferior minds and inferior morality.
And that cuts both ways, by the way. I am certainly not the first and only white man who is sick to death of having my classification of "white male" constantly assailed as the source of all evil in this world. If that isn't bigotry against while males, then nothing is. And by the way, I can't escape the disrespect of others for their bigotry against my whiteness and maleness any more than Oprah can escape the disrespect of others because of their bigotry against her blackness. So I'm not singling out blacks as the only "victims" of bigotry. I'm just acknowledging that they might be rightfully
tired of it when it happens; and because of their tiredness about it, they are angry; and because they are angry, they are less likely to be forgiving about it and more likely to hold onto the sense of righteous self-justification that comes with it. BTW, I put "victims" in quotes because being a victim of racism is largely a product of
acceptance. One
can choose not to be a victim of it by simply not bowing to its inevitability. Oprah is the holder of 2.7 billion reasons to not think of herself as a victim of race. If she still thinks of herself as a victim, it's either because she cynically uses her blackness to gain advantage in social/financial interactions, or it's simply a lifetime of habit. I would
rather assume that any feelings of victimhood she holds are the product of habit, because to assume the other would be to assume that she is a fundamentally evil person.
For my own part, I accept that we live in a fallen world. I accept it completely, and both soft and hardcore racism, from
all parties, is a product of that. It exists because the devil is real, and he is at work in this world. Furthermore, I don't have any hope whatsoever that mere
mankind can or will do anything about that. In fact, at this point all that can be done
legislatively and
constitutionally to improve race relations
has been done already, and no law will change the human heart. I've read the Owner's Manual. We win in the end, but there is a long rough road ahead, and like MLK said, I may not get there with the rest of you at the end. Although the end times often seem right around the corner, maybe they're not. Either way, I have zero expectation that
our puny efforts will make the world a better place because that's in God's hands, not ours. I don't believe that race relations will ever improve to the point of there being a
truly post-racial world........not until Jesus comes back.
Since there is no hope, the only thing we can do is individually to accept and laugh off, like Jace Robertson did, other people's assumptions about us; to not take everything so personally; and to have the discernment to be individually forgiving of the trespasses of other people against us when they are pretty small potatoes.