The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://www.texaschlforum.com/
Someone who carries a 1911 and not a Glock?PBratton wrote: Ah, but what IS a minority nowadays?
ShootDontTalk wrote:Someone who carries a 1911 and not a Glock?PBratton wrote: Ah, but what IS a minority nowadays?
Sorry, I couldn't help it.
IF (as in big IF) enough people OC and there are significant negative encounters with LEO of the non-OCT variety, we will see changes in the '17 session.SC-Texas wrote:And this is why we needed that amendment.
I am hoping one of the cities will screw up bad enough to make a lawsuit viable.
That is the best way to stop this behavior
What is your point? Are you inferring that during your stay in MI no one OCed?stroo wrote:I was in Michigan all last week. I didn't see a single person openly carrying.
I understand his point. I lived in La for 30 years and never saw a single person OC. It doesn't mean no one OCed during that time, it simply means that it was so rare that it is a statistical non-event.anygunanywhere wrote:What is your point? Are you inferring that during your stay in MI no one OCed?stroo wrote:I was in Michigan all last week. I didn't see a single person openly carrying.
Just checking.jmra wrote:I understand his point. I lived in La for 30 years and never saw a single person OC. It doesn't mean no one OCed during that time, it simply means that it was so rare that it is a statistical non-event.anygunanywhere wrote:What is your point? Are you inferring that during your stay in MI no one OCed?stroo wrote:I was in Michigan all last week. I didn't see a single person openly carrying.