TexasCHLforum.com

The Annoyed Man wrote:

bmwrdr wrote:

baldeagle wrote:Waffle House is a gun free zone nationwide.
...
You would think they'd learn.

You would wish they'd learn.

Maybe waffle houses are less dangerous than cafeterias?

IJK. I don't give my business to places that don't want me.

And since I want to live healthy I avoid their food anyway. There is enough concealed poison in their food and it is known for many years. One needs to take medication to digest the amount of sugar, salt, grease, artificial sweeteners, chemicals to color food and preservatives.
My preference is healthy food and the absence of medication, vitamin supplements and especially the associated medical bills.

ScottDLS wrote:

The Annoyed Man wrote:

Taypo wrote:

C-dub wrote:I haven't seen one posted with a 30.06 here in Texas. I thought they were only primarily against customers openly carrying in their business.

I suspect you're correct. Certain malls do the same thing - they preach no guns, but Ive never seen one posted. Personally, it won't stop me from carrying in one, but I understand the principle in not giving them business.

Grapevine Mills mall........posted all day long with compliant 30.06 signs, and Grapevine PD enforces.

Are the current signs at Grapevine Mills compliant? I thought they used the wrong wording.

I know GVPD says they enforce, but I'm not aware that they have actually had to...

For a long time they were the wrong wording, and then they were updated to the correct wording. However, I don't know whether they will be on the ball to change them again for 1/1/16, when the wording requirement changes again. But that said, even when they were incorrectly worded befor, it was Grapevine PD's policy to enforce them, wrong wording or not.

The Annoyed Man wrote:

ScottDLS wrote:

The Annoyed Man wrote:

Taypo wrote:

C-dub wrote:I haven't seen one posted with a 30.06 here in Texas. I thought they were only primarily against customers openly carrying in their business.

I suspect you're correct. Certain malls do the same thing - they preach no guns, but Ive never seen one posted. Personally, it won't stop me from carrying in one, but I understand the principle in not giving them business.

Grapevine Mills mall........posted all day long with compliant 30.06 signs, and Grapevine PD enforces.

Are the current signs at Grapevine Mills compliant? I thought they used the wrong wording.

I know GVPD says they enforce, but I'm not aware that they have actually had to...

For a long time they were the wrong wording, and then they were updated to the correct wording. However, I don't know whether they will be on the ball to change them again for 1/1/16, when the wording requirement changes again. But that said, even when they were incorrectly worded befor, it was Grapevine PD's policy to enforce them, wrong wording or not.

I have it on good authority that a CHL holder entering through a non posted entrance, engaged a GVPD officer in conversation while waiting for their wife. Not so much as a sideways glance from the LEO. At least that is the way I heard it.

Jim Gaffigan says about Waffle House.....Take a gas station bathroom. That sells waffles.

My perception as well.

Dragonfighter wrote:

The Annoyed Man wrote:

ScottDLS wrote:

The Annoyed Man wrote:

Taypo wrote:

C-dub wrote:I haven't seen one posted with a 30.06 here in Texas. I thought they were only primarily against customers openly carrying in their business.

I suspect you're correct. Certain malls do the same thing - they preach no guns, but Ive never seen one posted. Personally, it won't stop me from carrying in one, but I understand the principle in not giving them business.

Grapevine Mills mall........posted all day long with compliant 30.06 signs, and Grapevine PD enforces.

Are the current signs at Grapevine Mills compliant? I thought they used the wrong wording.

I know GVPD says they enforce, but I'm not aware that they have actually had to...

For a long time they were the wrong wording, and then they were updated to the correct wording. However, I don't know whether they will be on the ball to change them again for 1/1/16, when the wording requirement changes again. But that said, even when they were incorrectly worded befor, it was Grapevine PD's policy to enforce them, wrong wording or not.

I have it on good authority that a CHL holder entering through a non posted entrance, engaged a GVPD officer in conversation while waiting for their wife. Not so much as a sideways glance from the LEO. At least that is the way I heard it.

It is true that, for a time anyway, it was possible to enter the mall without seeing a sign by coming in through the anchor stores. Also, possibly the individual officers were not interested in enforcing it, but the official policy was that they certainly would. Keith B had an exchange of letters with GVPD in which the Chief clearly stated the position, without equivocation. Granted, concealed is concealed, so as long as your friend wasn't OCing, the risk was low. All I'm saying is that there existed an intent to enforce, even when the signs were invalid, and when some of the entrances weren't posted.